Der Hybrid-Hyrax-Distalizer – eine skelettal verankerte Apparatur für transversale und sagittale Korrekturen im Oberkiefer

Zusammenfassung

Die Kombination von sagittalen und transversalen Korrekturen sowohl zu orthopädischen als auch orthodontischen Zwecken stellt im Oberkiefer eine besondere Herausforderung an die Verankerung dar. Der mittels Mini-Implantaten im anterioren Gaumen skelettal verankerte Hybrid-Hyrax-Distalizer ist ein Gerät, das diese Aufgaben zuverlässig erfüllen kann. Die während der Klasse-III-Behandlung mittels Gesichtsmaske unvermeidbare Aufwanderung der Seitenzähne kann mit diesem Gerät nicht nur verhindert werden, sondern es kann zusätzlich Platz im Zahnbogen durch Molarendistalisierung geschaffen werden.

Abstract

The combination of sagittal and transverse corrections in the maxilla, not only for orthopedic but also for orthodontic purposes, requires stable anchorage. The Hybrid-Hyrax Distalizer, which is connected to two mini Implants in the anterior palate, is a device that fulfills these tasks reliably. The inevitable mesial migration of the upper dentition during facemask treatment can be prevented. If needed, this device can be used to create space in the maxillary arch by distalizing the upper molars after maxillary protraction.

Schlüsselwörter

Klasse-III-Behandlung - sagittale Verankerung

Key words

class III treatment - sagittal anchorage

• Literatur

• 1 Wilmes B, Ludwig B, Katyal V et al. The Hybrid Hyrax Distalizer, a new all-in-one appliance for rapid palatal expansion, early class III treatment and upper molar distalization. Journal of orthodontics 2014; 41 sup1 s47-s53
• 2 Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Pauls A et al. Multipurpose use of orthodontic mini-implants to achieve different treatment goals. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2012; 73: 467-476
• 3 Wilmes B, Nienkemper M, Drescher D. Application and effectiveness of a new mini-implant and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: The hybrid-hyrax. World J Orthod 2010; 2010:
• 4 Ludwig B, Baumgaertel S, Zorkun B et al. Application of a new viscoelastic finite element method model and analysis of miniscrew-supported hybrid hyrax treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 426-435
• 5 Ngan P, Wilmes B, Drescher D et al. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment. Progress in orthodontics 2015; 16: 1
• 6 Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Pauls A et al. Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination. Progress in orthodontics 2013; 14: 1
• 7 Schauseil M, Ludwig B, Zorkun B et al. Density of the midpalatal suture after RME treatment – a retrospective comparative low-dose CT-study. Head & face medicine 2014; 10: 1
• 8 Baccetti T, McGill JS, Franchi L et al. Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1998; 113: 333-343
• 9 Jäger A, Braumann B, Kim C et al. Skeletal and dental effects of maxillary protraction in patients with Angle Class III Malocclusion. A meta-analysis. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2001; 62: 275-284
• 10 Vaughn GA, Mason B, Moon H-B et al. The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2005; 128: 299-309
• 11 Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 555-568
• 12 De Clerck H, Cevidanes L, Baccetti T. Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: A controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2010; 138: 577-581
• 13 Liou Eric WCT A new protocol for maxillary protraction in cleft patients: repetitive weekly protocol of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions cleft palate – Craniofacial Journal Vol. 42
• 14 Wang YC, Chang PM, Liou EJ. Opening of circumaxillary sutures by alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 230-234
• 15 Masucci C, Franchi L, Giuntini V et al. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study. Orthodontics & craniofacial research 2014; 17: 259-269
• 16 Guyer EC, Ellis EE, McNamara JA et al. Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. The Angle orthodontist 1986; 56: 7-30
• 17 Ellis III E, McNamara Jr JA. Components of adult class III malocclusion. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1984; 42: 295-305
• 18 Jacobson A, Evans W, Preston C et al. Mandibular prognathism. American journal of orthodontics 1974; 66: 140-171
• 19 Sanborn RT. Differences between the facial skeletal patterns of class III malocclusion and normal occlusion*. The Angle Orthodontist 1955; 25: 208-222
• 20 Williams MD, Sarver DM, Sadowsky PL et al. Combined rapid maxillary expansion and protraction facemask in the treatment of Class III malocclusions in growing children: a prospective long-term study. Seminars in orthodontics 1997; 3: 265-274
• 21 McGill JS, McNamara J. Treatment and post-treatment effects of rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy. CRANIOFACIAL GROWTH SERIES 1999; 35: 123-152
• 22 Nienkemper M, Wilmes B, Pauls A et al. Treatment efficiency of mini-implant-borne distalization depending on age and second-molar eruption. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2014; 75: 118-132
• 23 Wilmes B, Nienkemper M, Drescher D. Der Beneslider zur Distalisierung im Oberkiefer. Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2013; 45: 42-50