Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2016; 37(10): 819-824
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-109066
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Beneficial Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning in Resistance Exercise Fade Over Time

M. Marocolo
1   Department of Physiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
5   Physiology & Anatomy, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany
,
I. C. Marocolo
2   Department of Sport Sciences, Human Performance and Sport Research Group, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil
,
G. R. da Mota
3   School of Physical Education and Sports, Rio de Janeiro, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
R. Simão
3   School of Physical Education and Sports, Rio de Janeiro, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
A. S. Maior
4   Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University Augusto Mota, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
H.-J. Appell Coriolano
5   Physiology & Anatomy, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 13 May 2016

Publication Date:
27 June 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) on resistance exercise performance in upper limbs. After 12-RM load determination, 21 men attended 4 trials separated by 3 days in a randomized crossover design: IPC (4×5-min occlusion 220 mmHg/reperfusion 0 mmHg) in arms and in thighs, and SHAM (equal to the IPC protocol but “occlusion” at 20 mmHg) in arms and in thighs. 8 min following the respective interventions, the subjects performed one set of resistance exercise in elbow flexion with the 12-RM load until concentric failure. The number of repetitions increased for both protocols in arm (IPC=14.1±2.5 and SHAM=14.4±3.0) and in thigh (IPC=14.3±2.2 and SHAM=13.4±1.7). However, the number of repetitions tended to decrease over the 4 trials and no more effect was found in the fourth trial. Therefore, IPC or SHAM may enhance performance in resistance exercise for upper limbs, but this effect apparently fades over time.

Key words

strength training - ischemia - skeletal muscle - reperfusion - RIPC - IPC
 

  • References

  • 1 American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 687-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Barbosa TC, Machado AC, Braz ID, Fernandes IA, Vianna LC, Nobrega AC, Silva BM. Remote ischemic preconditioning delays fatigue development during handgrip exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015; 25: 356-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2006; 1: 50-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bérdi MKF, Szabó A, Bárdos G. Placebo effects in sport and exercise: A meta analysis. Eur J Mental Health 2011; 6: 7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bogdanis GC, Nevill ME, Boobis LH, Lakomy HK, Nevill AM. Recovery of power output and muscle metabolites following 30 s of maximal sprint cycling in man. J Physiol 1995; 482 (Pt 2) 467-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Clevidence MW, Mowery RE, Kushnick MR. The effects of ischemic preconditioning on aerobic and anaerobic variables associated with submaximal cycling performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 3649-3654
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cochrane DJ, Booker HR, Mundel T, Barnes MJ. Does intermittent pneumatic leg compression enhance muscle recovery after strenuous eccentric exercise?. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 969-974
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Colloca L, Benedetti F. How prior experience shapes placebo analgesia. Pain 2006; 124: 126-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Colloca L, Miller FG. How placebo responses are formed: a learning perspective. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2011; 366: 1859-1869
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Developing maximal neuromuscular power: Part 2 – Training considerations for improving maximal power production. Sports Med 2011; 41: 125-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Crisafulli A, Tangianu F, Tocco F, Concu A, Mameli O, Mulliri G, Caria MA. Ischemic preconditioning of the muscle improves maximal exercise performance but not maximal oxygen uptake in humans. J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 530-536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 de Groot PC, Thijssen DH, Sanchez M, Ellenkamp R, Hopman MT. Ischemic preconditioning improves maximal performance in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 108: 141-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fell JW, Rayfield JM, Gulbin JP, Gaffney PT. Evaluation of the Accusport Lactate Analyser. Int J Sports Med 1998; 19: 199-204
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Foster GP, Giri PC, Rogers DM, Larson SR, Anholm JD. Ischemic preconditioning improves oxygen saturation and attenuates hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction at high altitude. High Alt Med Biol 2014; 15: 155-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Hittinger EA, Maher JL, Nash MS, Perry AC, Signorile JF, Kressler J, Jacobs KA. Ischemic preconditioning does not improve peak exercise capacity at sea level or simulated high altitude in trained male cyclists. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2015; 40: 65-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Janier MF, Vanoverschelde JL, Bergmann SR. Ischemic preconditioning stimulates anaerobic glycolysis in the isolated rabbit heart. Am J Physiol 1994; 267: H1353-H1360
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kellmann M. Preventing overtraining in athletes in high-intensity sports and stress/recovery monitoring. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010; 20 (Suppl. 02) 95-102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kentta G, Hassmen P. Overtraining and recovery. A conceptual model. Sports Med 1998; 26: 1-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kjeld T, Rasmussen MR, Jattu T, Nielsen HB, Secher NH. Ischemic preconditioning of one forearm enhances static and dynamic apnea. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014; 46: 151-155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lagally KM, Amorose AJ. The validity of using prior ratings of perceive exertion to regulate resistance exercise intensity. Percept Mot Skills 2007; 104: 534-542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lalonde F, Curnier DY. Can anaerobic performance be improved by remote ischemic preconditioning?. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 80-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Laurent CM, Green JM, Bishop PA, Sjokvist J, Schumacker RE, Richardson MT, Curtner-Smith M. A practical approach to monitoring recovery: development of a perceived recovery status scale. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 620-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Loenneke JP, Fahs CA, Rossow LM, Sherk VD, Thiebaud RS, Abe T, Bemben DA, Bemben MG. Effects of cuff width on arterial occlusion: implications for blood flow restricted exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 2903-2912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Marocolo M, da Mota GR, Pelegrini V, Appell Coriolano HJ. Are the beneficial effects of ischemic preconditioning on performance partly a placebo effect?. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 822-825
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Marocolo M, da Mota GR, Simim MA, Appell Coriolano HJ. Myths and facts about the effects of ischemic preconditioning on performance. Int J Sports Med 2016; 37: 87-96
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Marocolo M, Willardson JM, Marocolo IC, Ribeiro da Mota G, Simao R, Maior AS. Ischemic preconditioning and placebo intervention improves resistance exercise performance. J Strength Cond Res 2016; 30: 1462-1469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation 1986; 74: 1124-1136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Paixao RC, da Mota GR, Marocolo M. Acute Effect of ischemic preconditioning is detrimental to anaerobic performance in cyclists. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35: 912-915
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Price DD, Finniss DG, Benedetti F. A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought. Annu Rev Psychol 2008; 59: 565-590
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Rhea MR. Determining the magnitude of treatment effects in strength training research through the use of the effect size. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 918-920
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ross R, Gray CM, Gill JM. Effects of an injected placebo on endurance running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015; 47: 1672-1681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Ruiz RJ, Simao R, Saccomani MG, Casonatto J, Alexander JL, Rhea M, Polito MD. Isolated and combined effects of aerobic and strength exercise on post-exercise blood pressure and cardiac vagal reactivation in normotensive men. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 640-645
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sikorski EM, Wilson JM, Lowery RP, Joy JM, Laurent CM, Wilson SM, Hesson D, Naimo MA, Averbuch B, Gilchrist P. Changes in perceived recovery status scale following high-volume muscle damaging resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 2079-2085
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Simao R, Fleck SJ, Polito M, Monteiro W, Farinatti P. Effects of resistance training intensity, volume, and session format on the postexercise hypotensive response. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 853-858
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Tomlin DL, Wenger HA. The relationship between aerobic fitness and recovery from high intensity intermittent exercise. Sports Med 2001; 31: 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 231-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar