Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2016; 37(10): 831-837
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-103029
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Cross-validation of Peak Oxygen Consumption Prediction Models From OMNI Perceived Exertion

R. J. Mays
1   School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States
2   International Heart Institute, Providence Medical Group, Missoula, MT, United States
3   Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
4   Center for Women’s Health Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
,
F. L. Goss
5   Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
,
E. F. Nagle
5   Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
,
M. Gallagher Jr.
6   Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR, United States
,
L. Haile
7   Department of Health Sciences, Lock Haven University, Lock Haven, PA, United States
,
M. A. Schafer
8   Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, United States
,
K. H. Kim
9   Department of Psychology in Education, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
,
R. J. Robertson
5   Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 01 February 2016

Publication Date:
13 July 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study cross-validated statistical models for prediction of peak oxygen consumption using ratings of perceived exertion from the Adult OMNI Cycle Scale of Perceived Exertion. 74 participants (men: n=36; women: n=38) completed a graded cycle exercise test. Ratings of perceived exertion for the overall body, legs, and chest/breathing were recorded each test stage and entered into previously developed 3-stage peak oxygen consumption prediction models. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) between measured and predicted peak oxygen consumption from ratings of perceived exertion for the overall body, legs, and chest/breathing within men (mean±standard deviation: 3.16±0.52 vs. 2.92±0.33 vs. 2.90±0.29 vs. 2.90±0.26 L·min−1) and women (2.17±0.29 vs. 2.02±0.22 vs. 2.03±0.19 vs. 2.01±0.19 L·min−1) participants. Previously developed statistical models for prediction of peak oxygen consumption based on subpeak OMNI ratings of perceived exertion responses were similar to measured peak oxygen consumption in a separate group of participants. These findings provide practical implications for the use of the original statistical models in standard health-fitness settings.

Key words

prediction equations - cycle ergometry - undifferentiated and differentiated RPE - exercise testing
 

  • References

  • 1 ACSM. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 9th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2014: 480
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Ainsworth BE, Caspersen CJ, Matthews CE, Masse LC, Baranowski T, Zhu W. Recommendations to improve the accuracy of estimates of physical activity derived from self report. J Phys Act Health 2012; 9 (Suppl. 01) S76-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Al-Rahamneh HQ, Eston RG. Prediction of peak oxygen consumption from the ratings of perceived exertion during a graded exercise test and ramp exercise test in able-bodied participants and paraplegic persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 277-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Astrand PO, Rhyming I. A nomogram for calculation of aerobic capacity (physical fitness) from pulse rate during sub-maximal work. J Appl Physiol 1954; 7: 218-221
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Barkley JE, Roemmich JN. Validity of the CALER and OMNI-bike ratings of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 760-766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Coquart JB, Eston RG, Lemaitre F, Bart F, Tourny C, Grosbois JM. Prediction of peak oxygen uptake from ratings of perceived exertion during a sub-maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 115: 365-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Coquart JB, Garcin M, Parfitt G, Tourny-Chollet C, Eston RG. Prediction of maximal or peak oxygen uptake from ratings of perceived exertion. Sports Med 2014; 44: 563-578
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Eston R, Evans H, Faulkner J, Lambrick D, Al-Rahamneh H, Parfitt G. A perceptually regulated, graded exercise test predicts peak oxygen uptake during treadmill exercise in active and sedentary participants. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 3459-3468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fairbarn MS, Blackie SP, McElvaney NG, Wiggs BR, Pare PD, Pardy RL. Prediction of heart rate and oxygen uptake during incremental and maximal exercise in healthy adults. Chest 1994; 105: 1365-1369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Faulkner J, Eston R. Overall and peripheral ratings of perceived exertion during a graded exercise test to volitional exhaustion in individuals of high and low fitness. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007; 101: 613-620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Golding LA, Meyers CR, Sinning WE. Y’s way to physical fitness. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1989. 192.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Haile L, Gallagher MJ, Robertson RJ. Perceived exertion laboratory manual: from standard practice to contemporary application. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media; 2015. 322.
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med. 2015 36. 1121-1124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Janz KF. Use of heart rate monitors to assess physical activity. In: Welk GJ. (ed.). Physical Activity Assessments for Health-Related Research. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc; 2002: 143-161
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Kobayashi H. Effect of measurement duration on accuracy of pulse-counting. Ergonomics 2013; 56: 1940-1944
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Krause MP, Goss FL, Robertson RJ, Kim K, Elsangedy HM, Krinski K, da Silva SG. Concurrent validity of an OMNI rating of perceived exertion scale for bench stepping exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2012; 26: 506-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lambrick DM, Faulkner JA, Rowlands AV, Eston RG. Prediction of maximal oxygen uptake from submaximal ratings of perceived exertion and heart rate during a continuous exercise test: the efficacy of RPE 13. Eur J Appl Physiol 2009; 107: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mays RJ, Goss FL, Nagle EF, Gallagher M, Schafer MA, Kim KH, Robertson RJ. Prediction of VO2peak using OMNI Ratings of Perceived Exertion from a submaximal cycle exercise test. Percept Mot Skills 2014; 118: 863-881
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mays RJ, Goss FL, Schafer MA, Kim KH, Nagle-Stilley EF, Robertson RJ. Validation of adult OMNI perceived exertion scales for elliptical ergometry. Percept Mot Skills 2010; 111: 848-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Mays RJ, Gallagher MJ, Haile L, Goss FL, Nagle EF, Robertson RJ. Cross-validation of VO2peak prediction equations using submaximal OMNI RPE responses. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: S213-S214
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Nakamura FY, Perandini LA, Okuno NM, Borges TO, Bertuzzi RC, Robertson RJ. Construct and concurrent validation of OMNI-Kayak rating of perceived exertion scale. Percept Mot Skills 2009; 108: 744-758
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Nes BM, Janszky I, Wisloff U, Stoylen A, Karlsen T. Age-predicted maximal heart rate in healthy subjects: The HUNT fitness study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2013; 23: 697-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Noble BJ, Robertson RJ. Perceived Exertion. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1996. 336.
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Pandolf KB. Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion during physical exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 397-405
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Robertson RJ. Perceived Exertion for Practitioners: Rating Effort with the OMNI Picture System. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004: 184
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Robertson RJ, Gillespie RL, McCarthy J, Rose KD. Differentiated perceptions of exertion: part II. relationship to local and central physiological responses. Percept Mot Skills 1979; 49: 691-697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Dube J, Rutkowski J, Dupain M, Brennan C, Andreacci J. Validation of the adult OMNI scale of perceived exertion for cycle ergometer exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 102-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Boer NF, Peoples JA, Foreman AJ, Dabayebeh IM, Millich NB, Balasekaran G, Riechman SE, Gallagher JD, Thompkins T. Children’s OMNI scale of perceived exertion: mixed gender and race validation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 452-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Sarzynski MA, Rankinen T, Earnest CP, Leon AS, Rao DC, Skinner JS, Bouchard C. Measured maximal heart rates compared to commonly used age-based prediction equations in the Heritage Family Study. Am J Hum Biol 2013; 25: 695-701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Utter AC, Robertson RJ, Green JM, Suminski RR, McAnulty SR, Nieman DC. Validation of the Adult OMNI Scale of perceived exertion for walking/running exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1776-1780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Utter AC, Kang J, Nieman DC, Dumke CL, McAnulty SR. Validation of OMNI scale of perceived exertion during prolonged cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38: 780-786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar