Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2022; 38(03): 279-284
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741110
Original Research

Social Perception of Self-Enhanced Photographs

Keon M. Parsa 
1   Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Karina Charipova
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Eugenia Chu
1   Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Michael J. Reilly
1   Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The use of appearance manipulating applications on our smartphones has increased in popularity. As the aim of this study is to determine the impact of self-directed appearance manipulation on perceptions of personality and examine the influence of respondent age and gender on the various personality domains. This cross-sectional cohort study included 20 subjects between the ages of 18 to 34 who had headshots taken and were provided an introduction on the use of the Facetune2 app. After 1 week of engaging in digital appearance manipulation, subjects submitted their self-determined most attractive edited photograph. Four surveys were constructed with 10 sets of photographs each. Each of these surveys were then sent to lay people via a web-based survey tool. Anonymous blinded respondents used a 7-point Likert scale to rate their perception of each patient's aggressiveness, likeability, sociability, trustworthiness, attractiveness, authenticity, and masculinity or femininity. A multivariate linear mixed effect model was applied to analyze the overall patient trait data as well as to assess the impact of rater age and gender. A total of 288 respondents (mean age range, 25–34 years [43%]; 202 [70%] female) completed a survey. Overall, digitally enhanced photographs were perceived as more attractive (0.22; 95% CI, 0.06–0.38). Analysis based on gender of the study subjects revealed increased attractiveness scores for men (0.19; 95% CI, 0.07–0.33). Females were also perceived as being more attractive (0.16; 95% CI, 0.03–0.40), but less authentic (−0.24; 95% CI, −0.36 to −0.12). Females rated enhanced photographs of men as less masculine (−0.23; 95% CI, −0.46 to −0.04). Raters aged 35 to 64 rated altered photos as less attractive (0.31; 95% CI, 0.09–0.52), authentic (0.20; 95% CI, 0.01–0.38), and gender enhancing (0.42; 95% CI, 0.24–0.61) compared with individuals aged 18 to 34. Patients and surgeons should be aware of the ways in which self-enhanced photographs may affect social perception.

Keywords

selfie - Facetune - attractiveness - authenticity - appearance manipulation


Publication History

Article published online:
29 December 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Pew Research Center. Social Media Fact Sheet. Internet and Technology. Published 2019. Accessed December 14, 2020: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nayak LM, Linkov G. Social media marketing in facial plastic surgery: what has worked?. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2019; 27 (03) 373-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chen J, Ishii M, Bater KL. et al. Association between the use of social media and photograph editing applications, self-esteem, and cosmetic surgery acceptance. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2019; 21 (05) 361-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Arab K, Barasain O, Altaweel A. et al. Influence of social media on the decision to undergo a cosmetic procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (08) e2333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Othman S, Lyons T, Cohn J, Shokri T, Bloom J. The influence of photo editing applications on patients seeking facial plastic surgery services. Aesthet Surg J 2021; Feb 12; 41 (03) NP101-NP110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 McSweeney K. This is your brain on Instagram: Effects of social media on the brain. Northrop Grumman Now. Published 2019. Accessed December 14, 2020: https://now.northropgrumman.com/this-is-your-brain-on-instagram-effects-of-social-media-on-the-brain/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Haynes T. Dopamine, smartphones & you: a battle for your time. Harvard University Science in the News. Published 2020. Accessed December 14, 2020 at: http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2018/dopamine-smartphones-battle-time/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Vogel E, Rose J, Roberts L, Eckles K. Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychol Pop Media Cult 2014; 3: 206-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cristel R, Dayan S, Akinosun M, Russell P. Evaluation of selfies and filtered selfies and effects on first impressions. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41 (01) 122-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Todorov A, Said CP, Engell AD, Oosterhof NN. Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends Cogn Sci 2008; 12 (12) 455-460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Said CP, Sebe N, Todorov A. Structural resemblance to emotional expressions predicts evaluation of emotionally neutral faces. Emotion 2009; 9 (02) 260-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Todorov A, Dotsch R, Porter JM, Oosterhof NN, Falvello VB. Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces. Emotion 2013; 13 (04) 724-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rankin M, Borah GL. Perceived functional impact of abnormal facial appearance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (07) 2140-2146 , discussion 2147–2148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Reilly MJ, Tomsic JA, Fernandez SJ, Davison SP. Effect of facial rejuvenation surgery on perceived attractiveness, femininity, and personality. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17 (03) 202-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Parsa KM, Gao W, Lally J, Davison SP, Reilly MJ. Evaluation of personality perception in men before and after facial cosmetic surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2019; 21 (05) 369-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Parsa KM, Prasad N, Clark CM, Wang H, Reilly MJ. Digital appearance manipulation increases consideration of cosmetic surgery: a prospective cohort study. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2021; 23 (01) 54-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wheeler CK, Said H, Prucz R, Rodrich RJ, Mathes DW. Social media in plastic surgery practices: emerging trends in North America. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (04) 435-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Vardanian AJ, Kusnezov N, Im DD, Lee JC, Jarrahy R. Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (05) 1184-1193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rajanala S, Vashi NA. Normative discontent and social dysmorphia in the cosmetic patient. In: Rieder EA, Fried RG. eds. Essential Psychiatry for the Aesthetic Practitioner. Wiley; 2021
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Reaves S, Hitchon J, Park S, Yun G. “You Can Never Be Too Thin”—or Can You?: a pilot study on the effects of digital manipulation of fashion models” body size, leg length and skin color. Race Gend Class 2004; 11 (02) 140-155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Scott IM, Pound N, Stephen ID, Clark AP, Penton-Voak IS. Does masculinity matter? The contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans. PLoS One 2010; 5 (10) e13585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hage JJ, Becking AG, de Graaf FH, Tuinzing DB. Gender-confirming facial surgery: considerations on the masculinity and femininity of faces. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (07) 1799-1807
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 De Maio M, Rzany B. The Male Patient in Aesthetic Medicine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Etcoff NL, Stock S, Haley LE, Vickery SA, House DM. Cosmetics as a feature of the extended human phenotype: modulation of the perception of biologically important facial signals. PLoS One 2011; 6 (10) e25656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Solon O. FaceTune is conquering Instagram—but does it take airbrushing too far?. March 9, 2018. Accessed July 01, 2020 at: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/09/facetune-photoshopping-app-instagram-body-image-debate
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Chinski H, Chinski L, Armijos J, Arias JP. Rhinoplasty and its effects on the perception of beauty. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 17 (01) 47-50
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lu SM, Hsu DT, Perry AD. et al. The public face of rhinoplasty: impact on perceived attractiveness and personality. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (04) 881-887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Perlman SB, Morris JP, Vander Wyk BC, Green SR, Doyle JL, Pelphrey KA. Individual differences in personality predict how people look at faces. PLoS One 2009; 4 (06) e5952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar