Semin intervent Radiol 2022; 39(01): 032-039
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741078
Review Article

Patient Selection and Planning for Image-Guided Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement

John H. Crabtree
1   Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Harbor-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, California
,
Peter B. Hathaway
2   Utah Imaging Associates, Inc., St. Marks Hospital Interventional Radiology, Salt Lake City, Utah
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Image-guided percutaneous peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion has become increasingly relied upon to provide urgent access for late presenting kidney failure patients, to overcome surgical backlogs and limited operating room access, to avoid general anesthesia in high-risk patients, and, by itself, as an alternative approach to surgical PD access. Advanced planning for the procedure is essential to assure the best possible outcome. Appropriate selection of patients for percutaneous PD catheter placement, choosing the most suitable catheter type, determining insertion and exit site locations, and final patient preparations facilitate the performance of the procedure, minimizes the risk of complications, and improves the likelihood of providing a successful long-term peritoneal access.



Publication History

Article published online:
18 February 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 François K, Bargman JM. Evaluating the benefits of home-based peritoneal dialysis. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2014; 7: 447-455
  • 2 Sinnakirouchenan R, Holley JL. Peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis: risks, benefits, and access issues. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2011; 18 (06) 428-432
  • 3 Voss D, Hawkins S, Poole G, Marshall M. Radiological versus surgical implantation of first catheter for peritoneal dialysis: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27 (11) 4196-4204
  • 4 Joachim E, Gardezi AI, Chan MR, Shin JI, Astor BC, Waheed S. Association of pre-transplant dialysis modality and post-transplant outcomes: a meta-analysis. Perit Dial Int 2017; 37 (03) 259-265
  • 5 Ghaffari A. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis: a quality improvement report. Am J Kidney Dis 2012; 59 (03) 400-408
  • 6 Abdel-Aal AK, Dybbro P, Hathaway P, Guest S, Neuwirth M, Krishnamurthy V. Best practices consensus protocol for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement by interventional radiologists. Perit Dial Int 2014; 34 (05) 481-493
  • 7 Maher E, Wolley MJ, Abbas SA, Hawkins SP, Marshall MR. Fluoroscopic versus laparoscopic implantation of peritoneal dialysis catheters: a retrospective cohort study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25 (06) 895-903
  • 8 Morris CS. Interventional radiology placement and management of tunneled peritoneal dialysis catheters: a pictorial review. Radiographics 2020; 40 (06) 1789-1806
  • 9 Cullis B, Al-Hwiesh A, Kilonzo K. et al. ISPD guidelines for peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: 2020 update (adults). Perit Dial Int 2021; 41 (01) 15-31
  • 10 François K, Ronco C, Bargman JM. Peritoneal dialysis for congestive heart failure. Blood Purif 2015; 40 (01) 45-52
  • 11 National Kidney Foundation. NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30 (03, Suppl 2): S67-S136
  • 12 Balda S, Power A, Papalois V, Brown E. Impact of hernias on peritoneal dialysis technique survival and residual renal function. Perit Dial Int 2013; 33 (06) 629-634
  • 13 Lacour M, Ridereau Zins C, Casa C. et al. CT findings of complications after abdominal wall repair with prosthetic mesh. Diagn Interv Imaging 2017; 98 (7-8): 517-528
  • 14 Courivaud C, Roubiou C, Delabrousse E, Bresson-Vautrin C, Chalopin JM, Ducloux D. Polycystic kidney size and outcomes on peritoneal dialysis: comparison with haemodialysis. Clin Kidney J 2014; 7 (02) 138-143
  • 15 Sigel B, Golub RM, Loiacono LA. et al. Technique of ultrasonic detection and mapping of abdominal wall adhesions. Surg Endosc 1991; 5 (04) 161-165
  • 16 Shanmugalingam R, Makris A, Hassan HC. et al. The utility of sonographic assessment in selecting patients for percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter. Perit Dial Int 2017; 37 (04) 434-442
  • 17 Peppelenbosch A, van Kuijk WH, Bouvy ND, van der Sande FM, Tordoir JH. Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement technique and complications. NDT Plus 2008; 1 (Suppl. 04) iv23-iv28
  • 18 Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Consensus guidelines for the periprocedural treatment of thrombotic and bleeding risks in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions – Part II: Recommendations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30: 1168-1184
  • 19 Boccardo P, Remuzzi G, Galbusera M. Platelet dysfunction in renal failure. Semin Thromb Hemost 2004; 30 (05) 579-589
  • 20 Banerjee S, Angiolillo DJ, Boden WE. et al. Use of antiplatelet therapy/DAPT for post-PCI patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69 (14) 1861-1870
  • 21 Anderson M, Hassell KL, Trujillo TC, Wolfe B. When patients on target-specific oral anticoagulants need surgery. Cleve Clin J Med 2014; 81 (10) 629-639
  • 22 Sreenarasimhaiah VP, Margassery SK, Martin KJ, Bander SJ. Percutaneous technique of presternal peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. Semin Dial 2004; 17 (05) 407-410
  • 23 Nessim SJ, Bargman JM, Jassal SV. Relationship between double-cuff versus single-cuff peritoneal dialysis catheters and risk of peritonitis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25 (07) 2310-2314
  • 24 Vychytil A, Lorenz M, Schneider B, Hörl WH, Haag-Weber M. New strategies to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infections in peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998; 9 (04) 669-676
  • 25 Rubin J, Didlake R, Raju S, Hsu H. A prospective randomized evaluation of chronic peritoneal catheters. Insertion site and intraperitoneal segment. ASAIO Trans 1990; 36 (03) M497-M500
  • 26 Akyol AM, Porteous C, Brown MW. A comparison of two types of catheters for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Perit Dial Int 1990; 10 (01) 63-66
  • 27 Scott PD, Bakran A, Pearson R. et al. Peritoneal dialysis access. Prospective randomized trial of 3 different peritoneal catheters – preliminary report. Perit Dial Int 1994; 14 (03) 289-290
  • 28 Lye WC, Kour NW, van der Straaten JC, Leong SO, Lee EJ. A prospective randomized comparison of the swan neck, coiled, and straight Tenckhoff catheters in patients on CAPD. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16 (Suppl. 01) S333-S335
  • 29 Lo WK, Lui SL, Li FK. et al. A prospective randomized study on three different peritoneal dialysis catheters. Perit Dial Int 2003; 23 (Suppl. 02) S127-S131
  • 30 Banin VB, Ponce D, Dias DB. et al. Influence of the intra-peritoneal segment of the swan neck peritoneal catheter on infectious and mechanical complications and technique survival. Clin Exp Nephrol 2019; 23 (01) 135-141
  • 31 Stegmayr BG, Wikdahl AM, Bergström M. et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing the function of straight and coiled Tenckhoff catheters for peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2005; 25 (01) 85-88
  • 32 Xie J, Kiryluk K, Ren H. et al. Coiled versus straight peritoneal dialysis catheters: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2011; 58 (06) 946-955
  • 33 Ouyang CJ, Huang FX, Yang QQ. et al. Comparing the incidence of catheter-related complications with straight and coiled Tenckhoff catheters in peritoneal dialysis patients—a single-center prospective randomized trial. Perit Dial Int 2015; 35 (04) 443-449
  • 34 Chow KM, Wong SSM, Ng JKC. et al. Straight versus coiled peritoneal dialysis catheters: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 75 (01) 39-44
  • 35 Johnson DW, Wong J, Wiggins KJ. et al. A randomized controlled trial of coiled versus straight swan-neck Tenckhoff catheters in peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48 (05) 812-821
  • 36 Hagen SM, Lafranca JA, IJzermans JN, Dor FJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of peritoneal dialysis catheter type on complication rate and catheter survival. Kidney Int 2014; 85 (04) 920-932
  • 37 Jiang C, Xu L, Chen Y, Yan X, Sun C, Zhang M. A modified open surgery technique for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement decreases catheter malfunction. Perit Dial Int 2014; 34 (04) 358-367
  • 38 Crabtree JH, Burchette RJ, Siddiqi NA. Optimal peritoneal dialysis catheter type and exit site location: an anthropometric analysis. ASAIO J 2005; 51 (06) 743-747
  • 39 Crabtree JH, Burchette RJ. Prospective comparison of downward and lateral peritoneal dialysis catheter tunnel-tract and exit-site directions. Perit Dial Int 2006; 26 (06) 677-683
  • 40 Crabtree JH. Construction and use of stencils in planning for peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation. Perit Dial Int 2003; 23 (04) 395-398
  • 41 Kosmadakis G, Albaret J, Da Costa Correia E, Somda F, Aguilera D. Constipation in peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2019; 39 (05) 399-404
  • 42 Gadallah MF, Ramdeen G, Mignone J, Patel D, Mitchell L, Tatro S. Role of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing postoperative peritonitis in newly placed peritoneal dialysis catheters. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36 (05) 1014-1019
  • 43 Li PK, Szeto CC, Piraino B. et al. ISPD peritonitis recommendations: 2016 update on prevention and treatment. Perit Dial Int 2016; 36 (05) 481-508
  • 44 Leaper D, Burman-Roy S, Palanca A. et al; Guideline Development Group. Prevention and treatment of surgical site infection: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2008; 337: a1924