Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2023; 36(05): 507-514
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739147
Original Article

Adjusting Insert Thickness and Tibial Slope Do Not Correct Internal Tibial Rotation Loss Caused by PCL Resection: In Vitro Study of a Medial Constraint TKA Implanted with Unrestricted Calipered Kinematic Alignment

Alexander J. Nedopil 
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
,
Peter J. Thadani
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Illinois Bone & Joint Institute, Libertyville, Illinois
,
Thomas H. McCoy
3   Unova Hip and Knee Center, Lady Lake, Florida
,
Stephen M. Howell 
4   Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, California
,
Maury L. Hull 
5   Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Davis, California
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Most medial stabilized (MS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants recommend excision of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), which eliminates the ligament's tension effect on the tibia that drives tibial rotation and compromises passive internal tibial rotation in flexion. Whether increasing the insert thickness and reducing the posterior tibial slope corrects the loss of rotation without extension loss and undesirable anterior lift-off of the insert is unknown. In 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, an MS design with a medial ball-in-socket (i.e., spherical joint) and lateral flat insert was implanted with unrestricted calipered kinematic alignment (KA) and PCL retention. Trial inserts with goniometric markings measured the internal–external orientation relative to the femoral component's medial condyle at maximum extension and 90 degrees of flexion. After PCL excision, these measurements were repeated with the same insert, a 1 mm thicker insert, and a 2- and 4-mm shim under the posterior tibial baseplate to reduce the tibial slope. Internal tibial rotation from maximum extension and 90 degrees of flexion was 15 degrees with PCL retention and 7 degrees with PCL excision (p < 0.000). With a 1 mm thicker insert, internal rotation was 8 degrees (p < 0.000), and four TKAs lost extension. With a 2 mm shim, internal rotation was 9 degrees (p = 0.001) and two TKAs lost extension. With a 4 mm shim, internal rotation was 10 degrees (p = 0.002) and five TKAs lost extension and three had anterior lift-off. The methods of inserting a 1 mm thicker insert and reducing the posterior slope did not correct the loss of internal tibial rotation after PCL excision and caused extension loss and anterior lift-off in several knees. PCL retention should be considered when using unrestricted calipered KA and implanting a medial ball-in-socket and lateral flat insert TKA design, so the progression of internal tibial rotation and coupled reduction in Q-angle throughout flexion matches the native knee, optimizing the retinacular ligaments' tension and patellofemoral tracking.

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty - calipered - posterior cruciate ligament - tibial rotation - insert thickness


Publication History

Received: 14 March 2021

Accepted: 21 September 2021

Article published online:
15 November 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Riley J, Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML. Increases in tibial force imbalance but not changes in tibiofemoral laxities are caused by varus-valgus malalignment of the femoral component in kinematically aligned TKA. journal article. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (11) 3238-3248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Riley J, Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML. Internal-external malalignment of the femoral component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty increases tibial force imbalance but does not change laxities of the tibiofemoral joint. journal article. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (06) 1618-1628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML. Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty limits high tibial forces, differences in tibial forces between compartments, and abnormal tibial contact kinematics during passive flexion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (06) 1589-1601
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML. Tibial forces are more useful than varus-valgus laxities for identifying and correcting overstuffing in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2021; 39 (06) 1271-1280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Shelton TJ, Howell SM, Hull ML. Is there a force target that predicts early patient-reported outcomes after kinematically aligned TKA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477 (05) 1200-1207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclercq V, Hess S. Phenotyping the knee in young non-osteoarthritic knees shows a wide distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment. journal article. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (05) 1385-1393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclerq V, Hess S. Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients. journal article. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (05) 1394-1402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Almaawi AM, Hutt JRB, Masse V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA. The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (07) 2133-2140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM. et al. Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (Suppl. 02) 71-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chang JS, Kayani B, Wallace C, Haddad FS. Functional alignment achieves soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty as measured with quantitative sensor-guided technology. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B (03) 507-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 MacDessi SJ, Cohen DA, Wood JA, Diwan AD, Harris IA. Does the use of intraoperative pressure sensors for knee balancing in total knee arthroplasty improve clinical outcomes? A comparative study with a minimum two-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36 (02) 514-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 MacDessi SJ, Griffiths-Jones W, Harris IA, Bellemans J, Chen DB. Coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B (02) 329-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Meneghini RM, Ziemba-Davis MM, Lovro LR, Ireland PH, Damer BM. Can intraoperative sensors determine the “Target” ligament balance? Early outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (10) 2181-2187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Peters CL, Jimenez C, Erickson J, Anderson MB, Pelt CE. Lessons learned from selective soft-tissue release for gap balancing in primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 1216 consecutive total knee arthroplasties: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (20) e152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kayani B, Konan S, Horriat S, Ibrahim MS, Haddad FS. Posterior cruciate ligament resection in total knee arthroplasty: the effect on flexion-extension gaps, mediolateral laxity, and fixed flexion deformity. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B (10) 1230-1237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Warth LC, Deckard ER, Meneghini RM. Posterior cruciate ligament resection does not consistently increase the flexion space in contemporary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36 (03) 963-969
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Fukubayashi T, Torzilli PA, Sherman MF, Warren RF. An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee. Tibial displacement, rotation, and torque. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64 (02) 258-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Li G, Gill TJ, DeFrate LE, Zayontz S, Glatt V, Zarins B. Biomechanical consequences of PCL deficiency in the knee under simulated muscle loads–an in vitro experimental study. J Orthop Res 2002; 20 (04) 887-892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Li G, Papannagari R, Li M. et al. Effect of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on in vivo translation and rotation of the knee during weightbearing flexion. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (03) 474-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Freeman MA, Pinskerova V. The movement of the knee studied by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (410) 35-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Freeman MA, Pinskerova V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint Review. J Biomech 2005; 38 (02) 197-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA. Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82 (08) 1196-1198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Scott RD, Chmell MJ. Balancing the posterior cruciate ligament during cruciate-retaining fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: description of the pull-out lift-off and slide-back tests. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (04) 605-608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Pinskerova V, Johal P, Nakagawa S. et al. Does the femur roll-back with flexion?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (06) 925-931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Pinskerova V, Samuelson KM, Stammers J, Maruthainar K, Sosna A, Freeman MA. The knee in full flexion: an anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (06) 830-834
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Nedopil AJ, Zamora T, Shelton T, Howell SM, Hull M. A best-fit of an anatomic tibial baseplate closely parallels the flexion-extension plane and covers a high percentage of the proximal tibia. J Knee Surg 2020; (e-pub ahead of print). DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710367.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Howell SM, Shelton TJ, Gill M, Hull ML. A cruciate-retaining implant can treat both knees of most windswept deformities when performed with calipered kinematically aligned TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29 (02) 437-445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML. Deviations in femoral joint lines using calipered kinematically aligned TKA from virtually planned joint lines are small and do not affect clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28 (10) 3118-3127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Nedopil AJ, Singh AK, Howell SM, Hull ML. Does calipered kinematically aligned TKA restore native left to right symmetry of the lower limb and improve function?. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (02) 398-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML. Does malrotation of the tibial and femoral components compromise function in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? Review. Orthop Clin North Am 2016; 47 (01) 41-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Howell SM, Gill M, Shelton TJ, Nedopil AJ. Reoperations are few and confined to the most valgus phenotypes 4 years after unrestricted calipered kinematically aligned TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; (e-pub ahead of print). DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06473-3.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Shelton TJ, Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML. Do varus or valgus outliers have higher forces in the medial or lateral compartments than those which are in-range after a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? limb and joint line alignment after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B (10) 1319-1328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Johnson JM, Mahfouz MR, Midillioglu MR, Nedopil AJ, Howell SM. Three-dimensional analysis of the tibial resection plane relative to the arthritic tibial plateau in total knee arthroplasty. J Exp Orthop 2017; 4 (01) 27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML. Analysis of differences in laxities and neutral positions from native after kinematically aligned TKA using cruciate retaining implants. J Orthop Res 2019; 37 (02) 358-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Roth JD, Howell SM, Hull ML. Native knee laxities at 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion and their relationship to the goal of the gap-balancing alignment method of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (20) 1678-1684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Luyckx T, Vandenneucker H, Ing LS, Vereecke E, Ing AV, Victor J. Raising the joint line in TKA is associated with mid-flexion laxity: a study in cadaver knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476 (03) 601-611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Li G, Zayontz S, Most E, Otterberg E, Sabbag K, Rubash HE. Cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro comparison of the kinematics under muscle loads. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (8, Suppl 1): 150-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schutz P, Taylor WR, Postolka B. et al. Kinematic evaluation of the GMK sphere implant during gait activities: a dynamic videofluoroscopy study. J Orthop Res 2019; 37 (11) 2337-2347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Gray HA, Guan S, Young TJ, Dowsey MM, Choong PF, Pandy MG. Comparison of posterior-stabilized, cruciate-retaining, and medial-stabilized knee implant motion during gait. J Orthop Res 2020; 38 (08) 1753-1768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Nedopil AJ, Shekhar A, Howell SM, Hull ML. An insert with less than spherical medial conformity causes a loss of passive internal rotation after calipered kinematically aligned TKA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; (e-pub ahead of print). DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04054-0.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Zhang LK, Wang XM, Niu YZ, Liu HX, Wang F. Relationship between patellar tracking and the “screw-home” mechanism of tibiofemoral joint. Orthop Surg 2016; 8 (04) 490-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar