Effect of Tibial Slope on Coronal Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Malalignment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components affects function and survivorship. Common practice is to set coronal alignment prior to adjusting slope. With improper jig placement, adjustment of the slope may alter coronal alignment. The purpose of this study was to quantify the change in coronal alignment with increasing posterior tibial slope while comparing two methods of jig fixation. A prospective consecutive series of 100 patients underwent TKA using computer navigation. Fifty patients had the extramedullary cutting jig secured proximally with one pin and 50 patients had the jig secured proximally with two pins. Coronal alignment (CA) was recorded with each increasing degree of posterior slope (PS) from 0 to 7 degrees. Mean CA and change in CA were compared between cohorts. Utilizing one pin, osteotomies drifted into varus with an average change in CA of 0.34 degrees per degree PS. At 4 degrees PS, patients started to have >3 degrees of varus with 12.0% having >3 degrees of varus at 7 degrees PS. Utilizing two pins, osteotomies drifted into valgus with an average change of 0.04 degrees in CA per degree PS. No patients in the two-pin cohort fell outside 3 degrees varus/valgus CA. CA was significantly different at all degrees of PS between the cohorts. Changes in PS influenced CA making verification of tibial cut intraoperative critical. Use of >1 pin and computer navigation were beneficial to prevent coronal plane malalignment. This relationship may explain why computer navigation has been shown to improve alignment as well as survivorship and outcomes in some patients, especially those <65 years.

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty - computer navigation - coronal alignment

Publication History

Received: 27 July 2020

Accepted: 22 July 2021

Article published online:
15 November 2021

• References

• 1 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg -Ser A 2007; 89 (04) 780-785
• 2 Morgan SS, Bonshahi A, Pradhan N, Gregory A, Gambhir A, Porter ML. The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2008; 32 (05) 639-642
• 3 Bonner TJ, Eardley WGP, Patterson P, Gregg PJ. The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years. J Bone Jt Surg—Ser B 2011; 93 (09) 1217-1211
• 4 Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement: its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1994; 299: 153-156
• 5 Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB. et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2004; (428) 26-34
• 6 Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Jt Surg—Ser A 2007; 89 (02) 236-243
• 7 Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Jt Surg—Ser B 2003; 85: 830-835
• 8 Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (08) 1097-1106
• 9 Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, Proff G, Breitenfelder J, Ottersbach A. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (433) 152-159
• 10 Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2004; (428) 131-139
• 11 de Steiger RN, Liu YL, Graves SE. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (08) 635-642
• 12 Brereton SG, Grant A, Dlaska CE. Computer-assisted technologies in arthroplasty: navigating your way today. JBJS Rev 2020; 8 (03) e0157
• 13 Baier C, Wolfsteiner J, Otto F. et al. Clinical, radiological and survivorship results after ten years comparing navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a matched-pair analysis. Int Orthop 2017; 41 (10) 2037-2044
• 14 Todesca A, Garro L, Penna M, Bejui-Hugues J. Conventional versus computer-navigated TKA: a prospective randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (06) 1778-1783
• 15 Petursson G, Fenstad AM, Gøthesen Ø. et al. Computer-assisted compared with conventional total knee replacement: a multicenter parallel-group randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (15) 1265-1274
• 16 Brumby SA, Carrington R, Zayontz S, Reish T, Scott RD. Tibial plateau stress fracture: a complication of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using 4 guide pinholes. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (06) 809-812
• 17 Vail TP, Lang JE. Surgical Techniques and Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Sixth ed.. Elsevier Inc.; 2017
• 18 Zimmer Nex Gen CR-Flex and LPS-Flex Knees. Surgical Technique with Posterior Referencing Instrumentation. 2010 Available at: https://www.zimmerbiomet.com/content/dam/zimmer-biomet/medical-professionals/000-surgical-techniques/knee/zimmer-nexgen-cr-flex-lps-flex-knee-surgical-technique-posterior-referencing-instrumentation-surgical-technique.pdf
• 19 Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Jt Surg-Ser A 2010; 92 (12) 2143-2149