J Wrist Surg 2022; 11(04): 367-374
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731820
Survey or Meta-Analysis

Telemedicine Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of an International Survey

Farhan Ahmad
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
,
Robert W. Wysocki
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
,
Neil White
2   Section of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
,
Marc Richard
3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
,
Mark S. Cohen
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
,
Xavier Simcock
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study is to survey hand surgeons' perspectives on telemedicine during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and intended applications after the pandemic.

Methods Online surveys were sent to 285 Canadian and American surgeons in late April and early May 2020.

Results Response rate was 63% (180)—84% (152) American and 16% (28) Canadian. Forty-three percent (76) of respondents were in private practice, 36% (64) academics, 13% (24) privademics, and 6% (12) hospital employed. The most common telemedicine platform was Zoom. During the pandemic, 42% of patient visits were conducted via telemedicine; however, 37% required a subsequent in-person office visit. The most common complaint by surgeons was the inability to provide routine in-office procedures. The most beneficial feature was ease of use, and the most frustrating feature was connectivity difficulty. Time spent was similar to in-person visits, and surgeons were likely to recommend their platforms. Surgeons were neutral about using telehealth in the future and were most likely to use it for follow-up visits. New patient visits for traumatic injuries or fractures were of limited value. Canadians used telemedicine for a greater proportion than Americans (50 vs. 40%, p <0.05) and spent more time than in-person visits (7/10 vs. 5/10, p <0.05). Americans were more likely to use telemedicine for postoperative follow-up visits (6/10 vs. 4/10, p <0.05) and in mornings before clinic opens (4/10 vs. 2/10, p <0.05). Private practices were more likely to use telemedicine for future allied health provider visits than all other practice types (p <0.05).

Conclusion Telemedicine comprised nearly half of patient encounters during the COVID-19 pandemic, but limitations remain.

Ethical Approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. This study was reviewed by the Rush University Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB) and was approved for a waiver of informed consent.




Publication History

Received: 12 April 2021

Accepted: 08 June 2021

Article published online:
14 July 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Ryu S. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states: report on the second global survey on eHealth 2009 (Global Observatory for eHealth Series, Volume 2). Healthc Inform Res 2012; 18 (02) 153
  • 2 Grandizio LC, Foster BK, Klena JC. Telemedicine in hand and upper-extremity surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45 (03) 239-242
  • 3 Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu-Gjorgievska E. Barriers and facilitators that influence telemedicine-based, real-time, online consultation at patients' homes: systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (02) e16407
  • 4 Gabriel C, Mathiot A, Boumediane M. et al. Organization of outpatient consultations at a hand surgery department in a French university hospital during the COVID-19 lockdown. Hand Surg Rehabil 2021; 40 (01) 17-24
  • 5 Buvik A, Bugge E, Knutsen G, Småbrekke A, Wilsgaard T. Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16: 483
  • 6 Bravo D, Gaston RG, Melamed E. Environmentally responsible hand surgery: past, present, and future. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45 (05) 444-448
  • 7 Tripod M, Tait M, Bracey J, Sexton K, Beck W, Wyrick TO. The use of telemedicine decreases unnecessary hand trauma transfers. Hand (N Y) 2020; 15 (03) 422-427
  • 8 Gogia SB, Maeder A, Mars M, Hartvigsen G, Basu A, Abbott P. Contribution of the IMIA Working Group on Telehealth. Unintended consequences of tele health and their possible solutions. Yearb Med Inform 2016; (01) 41-46
  • 9 Miner H, Koenig K, Bozic KJ. Value-based healthcare: not going anywhere-why orthopaedic surgeons will continue using telehealth in a post-COVID-19 world. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478 (12) 2717-2719
  • 10 Buvik A, Bugge E, Knutsen G, Småbrekke A, Wilsgaard T. Patient reported outcomes with remote orthopaedic consultations by telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 2019; 25 (08) 451-459
  • 11 Naam NH, Sanbar S. Advanced technology and confidentiality in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (01) 182-187
  • 12 Blake JH, Schwemmer MK, Sade RM. The patient-surgeon relationship in the cyber era: communication and information. Thorac Surg Clin 2012; 22 (04) 531-538
  • 13 de la Torre-Díez I, López-Coronado M, Vaca C, Aguado JS, de Castro C. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21 (02) 81-85