Analysis of Our Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures in Adults: Are We Over Operating?

Abstract

Background Fractures of the distal radius are a common injury. The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and The British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) have released new guidelines outlining the management of these fractures, specifically identifying “thresholds for intervention,” based on radiological parameters for management with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

Questions/Purposes Have our distal radius fractures (DRFs), previously managed with ORIF, met the new guidelines' thresholds for intervention, based on radiological parameters?

Patients and Methods A retrospective assessment of DRFs treated with ORIF was performed between January 2017 and August 2018. Patients were categorized into three cohorts based on their age. The five radiological parameters of ulnar variance, dorsal tilt, radial inclination, radial height, and intra-articular step were measured on the initial plain radiograph, “pre-manipulation film,” postplaster application radiograph, and “post-manipulation film.”

These were compared with the “thresholds for intervention” outlined in the BOA/BSSH guidelines.

Results A total of 94 patients underwent an ORIF with a mean age of 56 years (range 17–86 years). As many as 75.74% of patients on the ”pre-manipulation film” met the “threshold for intervention” on at least one radiological parameter, while 53.57% of patients on the “post-manipulation” met at least one “threshold for intervention.” Dorsal tilt was the parameter that most often met the threshold in both films at 53.37% and 40.11%, respectively.

Conclusion Within our trust, there is a tendency to over manage the distal radius fracture with ORIF, potentially resulting in unnecessary operations. Education surrounding the new guidelines will better serve our decision-making.

Level of Evidence This is a level III study.

Keywords

distal radius fracture - radiological parameter - open reduction and internal fixation - threshold for intervention

Publication History

Received: 31 December 2019

Accepted: 16 May 2021

Article published online:
02 July 2021

• References

• 1 Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 2006; 37 (08) 691-697
• 2 Levin LS, Rozell JC, Pulos N. Distal radius fractures in the elderly. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017; 25 (03) 179-187
• 3 Melton III LJ, Cooper C. Magnitude and impact of osteoporosis and fractures. In: Osteoporosis. The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2001: 557-567
• 4 MacIntyre NJ, Dewan N. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures and factors predicting risk and prognosis. J Hand Ther 2016; 29 (02) 136-145
• 5 Stirling ERB, Johnson NA, Dias JJ. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in a geographically defined adult population. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018; 43 (09) 974-982
• 6 Moore CM, Leonardi-Bee J. The prevalence of pain and disability one year post fracture of the distal radius in a UK population: a cross sectional survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9 (01) 129
• 7 Johnson NA, Cutler L, Dias JJ, Ullah AS, Wildin CJ, Bhowal B. Complications after volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures. Injury 2014; 45 (03) 528-533
• 8 Arora R, Lutz M, Hennerbichler A, Krappinger D, Espen D, Gabl M. Complications following internal fixation of unstable distal radius fracture with a palmar locking-plate. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21 (05) 316-322
• 9 Stirling E, Jeffery J, Johnson N, Dias J. Are radiographic measurements of the displacement of a distal radial fracture reliable and reproducible?. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B [phone]
• 10 British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH). Best practice for management of distal radius fractures (DRFs). 2018 . Accessed September 2018 at: https://www.bssh.ac.uk/_userfiles/pages/files/professionals/Radius/Blue%20Book%20DRF%20Final%20Document.pdf
• 11 Ilyas AM. Surgical approaches to the distal radius. Hand (N Y) 2011; 6 (01) 8-17
• 12 Medoff RJ. Essential radiographic evaluation for distal radius fractures. Hand Clin 2005; 21 (03) 279-288
• 13 Walenkamp MM, Aydin S, Mulders MA, Goslings JC, Schep NW. Predictors of unstable distal radius fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41 (05) 501-515
• 14 Bartl C, Stengel D, Bruckner T, Gebhard F. ORCHID Study Group. The treatment of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures in elderly patients. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111 (46) 779-787
• 15 Meek R, Sundaralingam A, Shen M, Sundaralingam A, Sorace L. Functional outcome and management pathways for adult patients presenting to an australian health service with distal radius fracture. Emerg Med Australas 2020; 32 (01) 105-111
• 16 Holkenborg J, Napel J, Kolkman K. 174 closed reduction of distal radius fractures: Is finger trap traction superior to manual traction?, Ann Emerg Med. 2013 62. 04
• 17 Earnshaw SA, Aladin A, Surendran S, Moran CG. Closed reduction of colles fractures: comparison of manual manipulation and finger-trap traction: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84 (03) 354-358
• 18 Dixon S, Allen P, Bannister G. Which Colles' fractures should be manipulated?. Injury 2005; 36 (01) 81-83
• 19 Giannoudis PV, Tzioupis C, Papathanassopoulos A, Obakponovwe O, Roberts C. Articular step-off and risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Evidence today. Injury 2010; 41 (10) 986-995