Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37(04): 543-549
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730384
Original Research

Skin Necrosis Following Rhinoplasty: A Review and Proposed Strategy on Identifying High-Risk Patients

George Ferzli 
1   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
,
Rakhna Araslanova
1   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
,
Daniel Sukato
2   Department of Otolaryngology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, New York City, New York
,
Thomas Romo III
3   Department of Otolaryngology, Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Institute, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Vascular compromise leading to cutaneous loss following surgical rhinoplasty is a devastating complication. The objective of this review is to identify all reported cases in literature published in English and summarize the current evidence to identify the patients at risk of this complication following surgery. A comprehensive literature review using Medline and Embase databases was performed to capture all reported cases of cutaneous vascular compromise following rhinoplasty from database inception through September 2020. Nonsurgical rhinoplasty cases were excluded. We identified eight studies that featured vascular cutaneous compromise following surgical rhinoplasty. A total of 18 patients were included in the analysis. The majority of the patients were females with a mean age of 30.9. Risk factors included smoking in 23.5% patients and revision setting. Extensive tip thinning, tight splinting and taping with dorsal onlay grafting, or combining extended alar base excision with revision open rhinoplasty were among surgical techniques associated with vascular compromise. The most commonly affected aesthetic nasal subunit in our review was the dorsum followed by the nasal tip. Conservative management primarily was utilized in 72.2% of patients, allowing the defect to heal by secondary intention. Studies reporting on cutaneous vascular compromise following surgical rhinoplasty are of low level of evidence. This review is the largest summary reporting on this complication to date, aiming to caution surgeons about associated techniques and management options. We also share an expert opinion on preoperative assessment of nasal skin to guide surgeons to potentially avoid rhinoplasty surgery in this subset of patients.

Keywords

rhinoplasty - skin necrosis - revision rhinoplasty


Publication History

Article published online:
03 June 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Cochran CS, Landecker A. Prevention and management of rhinoplasty complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (02) 60e-67e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Toriumi DM, Mueller RA, Grosch T, Bhattacharyya TK, Larrabee Jr WF. Vascular anatomy of the nose and the external rhinoplasty approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (01) 24-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rohrich RJ, Gunter JP, Friedman RM. Nasal tip blood supply: an anatomic study validating the safety of the transcolumellar incision in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95 (05) 795-799 , discussion 800–801
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Niranjan NS. An anatomical study of the facial artery. Ann Plast Surg 1988; 21 (01) 14-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jung DH, Kim HJ, Koh KS. et al. Arterial supply of the nasal tip in Asians. Laryngoscope 2000; 110 (2, Pt 1): 308-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Saban Y, Andretto Amodeo C, Bouaziz D, Polselli R. Nasal arterial vasculature: medical and surgical applications. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012; 14 (06) 429-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rohrich RJ, Muzaffar AR, Gunter JP. Nasal tip blood supply: confirming the safety of the transcolumellar incision in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (07) 1640-1641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med 2009; 3 (03) e123-e130
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Benvenuti D. Necrosis of the nasal tip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (01) 223-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ersek RA. Necrosis of the nasal tip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97 (02) 491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tellioğlu AT, Vargel I, Cavuşoğlu T, Cimen K. Simultaneous open rhinoplasty and alar base excision for secondary cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29 (03) 151-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Eskitascioglu T, Kemaloglu AC. Skin necrosis in nasal dorsum following rhinoplasty. Eur J Plast Surg 2010; 33: 49-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lan MY, Jang YJ. Revision rhinoplasty for short noses in Asian population. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2015; 17 (05) 325-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Amirlak B, Dehdashtian A, Sanneic K, Lu KB, Cheng J. Unique uses of SPY: revision rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (06) e2123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mrad MA, Almarghoub MA. Skin necrosis following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (02) e2077
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bilgen F, Ince B, Ural A, Bekerecioğlu M. Disastrous complications following rhinoplasty: soft tissue defects. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31 (03) 809-812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bafaqeeh SA, Al-Qattan MM. Simultaneous open rhinoplasty and alar base excision: is there a problem with the blood supply of the nasal tip and columellar skin?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (01) 344-347 , discussion 348–349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar