Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37(07): 597-601
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1723821
Original Article

Telehealth: Could It Be an Avenue to Microvascular Breast Reconstruction for Patients with Geographical Barriers?

Salih Colakoglu 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Ariel Johnson 
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado
,
Marc A.M. Mureau 
3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Sara Douglass
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado
,
Christodoulos Kaoutzanis
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado
,
Tae W. Chong
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado
,
David W. Mathes
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado
,
Justin B. Cohen
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background All women undergoing a mastectomy have the right to reconstruction. However, many women do not receive reconstruction and many more are not aware of all the reconstructive options available to them. Travel distance to a center that provides reconstruction and subsequent follow-up may be a contributing factor to this disparity especially among those who seek microsurgical options. Telehealth, which provides patients with remote video consultations and decreases the travel burden, may be a solution to optimize the accessibility of breast reconstruction for these patients. The purpose of this study was to discuss the efficacy and reliability of telehealth to overcome geographic barriers.

Methods Patients who received breast reconstruction and participated in video telehealth visits between February and May 2020 were included in this study. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes were collected. Video telehealth encounters were reviewed to determine specific concerns and questions discussed during these encounters.

Results A total of 235 breast reconstruction surgery patient encounters were recorded for 4 plastic surgeons who offer microsurgical breast reconstruction. Eighty-eight patients (37.4%) were seen as telehealth visits, 20 (22.7%) of which were new patient visits. Eight (9.09%) patients were microsurgical breast reconstruction candidates and 25 (28.4%) were following-up after microsurgical breast reconstruction. The majority of telehealth visits included normally healing wounds in the postoperative patient.

Conclusion Telehealth provides an avenue for premastectomy consultation, second opinion visits, and postoperative follow-up for patients who have geographical barriers precluding them from reaching plastic surgeons who perform all types of breast reconstruction.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - perforator flap - microsurgery - telehealth - telemedicine


Publication History

Received: 26 July 2020

Accepted: 21 December 2020

Article published online:
16 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 U.S. Department of Labor. Women's Health and Cancer Rights. https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/health-plans/womens . Accessed May 16, 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Pusic AL. et al. The influence of sociodemographic factors and hospital characteristics on the method of breast reconstruction, including microsurgery: a U.S. population-based study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (05) 1071-1079
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Miller AM, Steiner CA, Barrett ML, Fingar KR, Elixhauser A. Breast Reconstruction Surgery for Mastectomy in Hospital Inpatient and Ambulatory Settings, 2009–2014: Statistical Brief #228. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville (MD). 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 4 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. American Society of Plastic Surgeons closes loop on breast cancer during first BRA Day USA, October 17. . Accessed January 19, 2021 at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/press-releases/american-society-of-plastic-surgeons-closes-loop-on-breast-cancer-during-first-bra-day-usa-october-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Albornoz CR, Cohen WA, Razdan SN. et al. The impact of travel distance on breast reconstruction in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 12-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction 7S-13S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ. et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (01) 15-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Diver AJ, Lewis H, Gordon DJ. Telemedicine and trauma referrals--a plastic surgery pilot project. Ulster Med J 2009; 78 (02) 113-114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Douglas S, Geiger E, McGregor A. et al. Telehealth in plastic surgery: a Veterans Affairs Hospital perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (10) e1840
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Funderburk CD, Batulis NS, Zelones JT. et al. Innovations in the plastic surgery care pathway: using telemedicine for clinical efficiency and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (02) 507-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hop MJ, Moues CM, Bogomolova K. et al. Photographic assessment of burn size and depth: reliability and validity. J Wound Care 2014; 23 (03) 144-145 , 148–152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chi D, Chen AD, Dorante MI, Lee BT, Sacks JM. Plastic surgery in the time of COVID-19. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kruper L, Xu X, Henderson K, Bernstein L. Disparities in reconstruction rates after mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): patterns of care and factors associated with the use of breast reconstruction for DCIS compared with invasive cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18 (11) 3210-3219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Polednak AP. Geographic variation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (02) 298-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Butler PD, Nelson JA, Fischer JP. et al. Racial and age disparities persist in immediate breast reconstruction: an updated analysis of 48,564 patients from the 2005 to 2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program data sets. Am J Surg 2016; 212 (01) 96-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Preminger BA, Trencheva K, Chang CS. et al. Improving access to care: breast surgeons, the gatekeepers to breast reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 214 (03) 270-276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 American Board of Plastic Surgery. Statistics. Accessed May 16, 2020 at: https://www.abplasticsurgery.org/about-us/statistics/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Yang J, Jayanti MK, Taylor A, Williams TE, Tiwari P. The impending shortage and cost of training the future plastic surgical workforce. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (02) 200-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ho AL, Klassen AF, Cano S, Scott AM, Pusic AL. Optimizing patient-centered care in breast reconstruction: the importance of preoperative information and patient-physician communication. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (02) 212e-220e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ashraf AA, Colakoglu S, Nguyen JT. et al. Patient involvement in the decision-making process improves satisfaction and quality of life in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. J Surg Res 2013; 184 (01) 665-670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Zajdel R, Krakowiak A, Zajdel J. [The analysis of legal basis of telediagnosis and teleconsultation in clinical practice. are we allowed to consult our patients via phone? Part I]. Med Pr 2010; 61 (02) 155-163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Zajdel R, Zajdel J. [The analysis of legal basis of telediagnosis and teleconsultation in clinical practice. Are we allowed to consult our patients via phone? Part II]. Med Pr 2010; 61 (04) 449-455
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gardiner S, Hartzell TL. Telemedicine and plastic surgery: a review of its applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (03) e47-e53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar