Relationship between Verbal and Nonverbal Tests of Auditory Temporal Processing

Abstract

Background Audiologists may choose to evaluate auditory temporal processing in assessing auditory processing abilities. Some may decide to use measures of nonverbal stimuli such as tonal or noise gap detection. Others may decide to use verbal measures such as time compressed sentences (TCS). Many may choose to use both.

Purpose Since people typically come to audiologists for auditory processing testing complaining of problems processing verbal stimuli, the question arises whether measures of nonverbal stimuli provide evidence regarding a person's abilities to processing verbal stimuli. That is, are there significant correlations between measures of verbal stimuli and nonverbal stimuli that are used to evaluate auditory temporal processing?

Research Design The present investigation is an exploratory study using file review of 104 people seen for routine auditory processing evaluations by the authors.

Study Sample A file review was completed based on data from 104 people seen for auditory processing evaluations.

Data Collection and Analyses The data from these 104 files were used to evaluate whether there are any correlations between verbal and nonverbal measures of auditory temporal processing. The verbal measure used was the TCS subtest of the SCAN-3 while the nonverbal measures included the gap detection screening from the SCAN-3 as well as the gaps-in-noise measures. Results from these tests were compared to determine whether any significant correlations were found based on results from Pearson product moment correlational analyses.

Results None of the nonverbal measures were found to have a significant correlation with the TCS test findings based on the Pearson correlations used to analyze the data.

Conclusion Results indicate that there are no significant correlations (relationships) between measures of auditory temporal processing using nonverbal stimuli versus verbal stimuli based on the tests used in the present investigation. These findings lead to a conclusion that tests using nonverbal stimuli are measuring different auditory processes than the measure of verbal stimuli used in the present investigation. Since people typically come complaining about understanding verbal input, it is concluded that audiologists should use some verbal measure of auditory temporal processing in their auditory processing test battery.

Keywords

auditory temporal processing - auditory processing abilities - gap detection - gaps-in-noise - time compressed sentences

Publication History

Received: 09 April 2020

Accepted: 26 October 2020

Article published online:
20 May 2021

• References

• 1 American Academy of Audiology (AAA). American Academy of Audiology Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis, Treatment and Management of Children and Adults with Central Auditory Processing Disorder. 2010 . Available at: https://audiologyweb.s3.amazonaws.com/migrated/CAPD%20Guidelines%208-2010.pdf_539952af956c79.73897613.pdf
• 2 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2005 a. Central auditory processing disorders [Technical Report] Available at: www.asha.org/policy https://www.asha.org/policy/TR2005-00043/
• 3 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). 2005 a. Central Auditory Processing Disorders – The Role of the Audiologist: Position Statement from Working Group on Auditory Processing Disorders. Available at: https://www.asha.org/policy/PS2005–00114/
• 4 Keith RW. SCAN-3 A: Tests for Auditory Processing Disorders in Adolescents and Adults. New York, NY: Pearson Publishers; 2009. a
• 5 Keith RW. SCAN-3 C: Tests of Auditory Processing Disorders in Children. New York, NY: Pearson Publishers; 2009. b
• 6 Auditec, Inc.. Gaps-in-Noise (GIN). 2015 a. Available at: https://auditec.com/2015/09/22/gaps-in-noise-gin/
• 7 Musiek FE. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol 1994; 5 (04) 265-268
• 8 Bellis J, Roots A, Bellis TJ. (n.d.) Mind the Gap: A Gap Detection Study. Paper presented at: an Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
• 9 Hoover E, Pasquesi L, Souza P. Comparison of clinical and traditional gap detection tests. J Am Acad Audiol 2015; 26 (06) 540-546
• 10 Lucker JR, Chang J, Finley N, Mims A, Silva A. What do non-verbal measures of auditory processing tell us?. Topics in Central Audit Processing 2018; 3 (4)): 7-11
• 11 Heath A. Test of Auditory and Verbal Skills (TAVS): Overview. Ogden, UT: Advanced Brain Technologies; 2014. a
• 12 Heath. TAVS: Introduction to the Test of Auditory and Visual Skills. 2014 b. Available at: https://advancedbrain.com/the-listening-program-radio/tavs-an-introduction-to-the-test-of-auditory-and-visualskills/ and https://advancedbrain.com/tavs/
• 13 Heath A. 2015 A pilot study to investigate the efficacy of using the test of auditory and visual skills (TAVS) for pre and post testing measures. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/abt-media/pdf/science/Pilot_Study_All_Saints_TAVS.pdf
• 14 Auditec, Inc.. 2015 b. NU-6 time compressed words. Available at: https://auditec.com/2015/09/29/time-compressed-words/
• 15 Auditec, Inc.. 2015 c. Rapid alternating speech. Available at: https://auditec.com/2015/09/29/rapid-alternating-speech/#:~:text=The%20Rapid%20Alternating%20Speech%20is,The%20period%20is%20600%20msec
• 16 Park J, Lee JH. A comparison of auditory temporal processing in young, middle-aged, and older adults: measures of GAP (Gaps-in-noise) and time-compressed sentence recognition. Audiol Speech Res 2015; 11 (04) 310-319