Endonasal FLI Approach for Rhinoplasty with Modified Cottle Low Strip Septoplasty

Abstract

To date, an endonasal approach has not been described that combines different incisions to provide exposure of all of the key anatomical structures, allowing for adequate, comprehensive visualization of the nasal architecture including the complete quadrangular cartilage and its extension with the upper lateral cartilages, including the caudal septal border from the ventral border and anterior nasal spine to the anterior septal angle, the scroll, and internal nasal valve.

The endonasal approach that Fausto Lopez-Infante designed, the FLI technique, combines several basic known endonasal incisions that together allow excellent access and great visualization of the intranasal surgical field, enables extensive septal work, and preserves the natural anatomy of the dorsum as well as the tip support structures.

This technique and approach to nasal surgery are based on an understanding of anatomy, allow standardization of the surgery, and make it reproducible. It is an outstanding option with excellent cosmetic and functional results.

Keywords

FLI approach - endonasal approach - septorhinoplasty - technique - nasal anatomy

Publication History

Article published online:
24 February 2021

• References

• 1 Crumley RL. Some pioneers in plastic surgery of the facial region. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003; 5 (01) 9-15
• 2 Angelos PC, Been MJ, Toriumi DM. Contemporary review of rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012; 14 (04) 238-247
• 3 Toriumi DM, Mueller RA, Grosch T, Bhattacharyya TK, Larrabee Jr WF. Vascular anatomy of the nose and the external rhinoplasty approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (01) 24-34
• 4 Cottle MH, Loring RM, Fischer GG, Gaynon IE. The maxilla-premaxilla approach to extensive nasal septum surgery. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 1958; 68 (03) 301-313
• 5 Palma P, Khodaei I, Bertossi D. et al. Hybrid rhinoplasty: beyond the dichotomy of rhinoplasty techniques. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2013; 33 (03) 154-162
• 6 Kasperbauer JL, Kern EB. Nasal valve physiology. Implications in nasal surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1987; 20 (04) 699-719
• 7 Neves JC, Tagle DA, Dewes W, Larrabee Jr W. The split preservation rhinoplasty: “the Vitruvian Man split maneuver. Eur J Plast Surg 2020; 43: 323-333
• 8 Schulte DL, Sherris DA, Kern EB. M-plasty correction of nasal valve obstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 1999; 7 (03) 405-409
• 9 Ireton JE, Unger JG, Rohrich RJ. The role of wound healing and its everyday application in plastic surgery: a practical perspective and systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2013; 1 (01) 1-10
• 10 Daniel RK, Palhazi P. The nasal ligaments and tip support in rhinoplasty: an anatomical study. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (04) 357-368
• 11 Daniel RK. Secondary rhinoplasty following open rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (07) 1539-1546
• 12 Burke A, Cook T. Open versus closed rhinoplasty: what have we learned. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 8: 332-336
• 13 Adamson JE. Constriction of the internal nasal valve in rhinoplasty: treatment and prevention. Ann Plast Surg 1987; 18 (02) 114-121
• 14 Constantian MB, Martin JP. Why can't more good surgeons learn rhinoplasty?. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (04) 486-489