Download PDF
neuroreha 2015; 07(04): 164-167
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-104794
Schwerpunkt Training
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Aufgabenorientierte Therapie

Martin Huber
1   Konstanz
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 December 2015 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Der aufgabenorientierte Behandlungsansatz gilt (im deutschsprachigen Raum) als großer Gegenspieler der sog. „etablierten“ bzw. „traditionellen“ Behandlungsmethoden wie dem Bobath-Konzept, PNF oder der Vojta-Therapie. Diese Therapiemethoden geraten in Zeiten evidenzbasierter Praxis aufgrund mangelnder Wirksamkeitsbelege zusehends unter Druck. Nicht zuletzt das aufsehenerregende Review von Boudewijn Kollen im Jahr 2009 [17] über die Wirksamkeit des Bobath-Konzepts heizte die Diskussionen und die kritische Reflexion an.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Askim T, Indredavik B, Engen A et al. Physiotherapy after stroke: To what extent is task-oriented practice a part of conventional treatment after hospital discharge?. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 2013; 29 (5) 343-350
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Balasubramanian CK, Clark DJ, Fox EJ. Walking adaptability after a stroke and its assessment in clinical settings. Stroke Research and Treatment 2014; DOI: 10.1155/2014/591013.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Cabanas-Valdes R, Cuchi GU, Bagur-Calafat C. Trunk training exercises approaches for improving trunk performance and functional sitting balance in patients with stroke: A systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation 2013; 33: 575-592
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Callahan J et al. Perspective: Impact of the IIISTEP Conference on Clinical Practice. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 2006; 30: 157-166
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Carr J, Shepherd R. A Motor Relearning Programme for Stroke. Butterworth-Heinemann; 1987
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Carr J, Shepherd R. Stroke Rehabilitation: Guidelines for Exercise and Training to optimize Motor Skill. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 7 DePaul V. Varied overground walking-task practice versus body-weight-supported treadmill training in ambulatory adults within one year of stroke: A randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Neurol 2011; 11: 129
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Eckhardt G. Posturale Kontrolle und die Bedeutung für das Sturzrisiko bei Patienten nach Schlaganfall (Teil 1). PT Zeitschrift für Physiotherapeuten 2013; 65 (1) 30
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Eng J. Gait training strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke: A synthesis of the evidence. Expert Rev Neurother 2007; 7 (10) 1417-1436
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gruber M, Gruber SBH, Kramer A. Effektiv trainieren. neuroreha 2015; 7 (4) 154-163
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hesse S. Lokomotionstherapie. Bad Honnef: Hippocampus; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Horak F. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Phys Ther 2009; 89: 484-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Huber M. Das Richtige üben – Transfer motorischer Fertigkeiten in der Physiotherapie. Physiopraxis 2008; 6 (4) 28-31
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Huber M. Posturale Kontrolle. pt_Zeitschrift für Physiotherapeuten 2014; 66 (5) 12-23
    Google Scholar
  • 15 KNGF Clinical Practice Guideline for Physical Therapy in patients with stroke. 2014 Im Internet: http://neurorehab.nl/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/stroke_practice_guidelines_2014.pdf Stand: 25.09.2015
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Kirchner G, Pöhlmann R. Lehrbuch der Sportmotorik. Psychomotorische Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Kassel: Zimmermann + Kaul; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Kollen BJ et al. The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: What is the evidence?. Stroke 2009; 40 (4) e89-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kwakkel G. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14 (2) 224-234
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Latash M. What are „normal movements” in atypical populations?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1996; 19 (1) 55-106
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Latash M. Neurophysiological Basis of Movement. 2. ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Latham NK. Physical therapy during stroke rehabilitation for people with different walking abilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: S41-50
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Majsak MJ. Application of motor learning principles to the CVA population. Top Stroke Rehab 1996; 3: 27-59
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Marigold DS et al. Exercise leads to faster postural reflexes, improved balance and mobility, and fewer falls in older persons with chronic stroke. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 416-423
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mehrholz J. Frühphase Schlaganfall. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Mehrholz J. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014; (1)
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: Characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys 2006; 42 (3) 257-268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Nieuwboer A et al. Motor learning in Parkinson’s disease: Limitations and potential for rehabilitation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2009; 15 (Suppl. 03) S53-58
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Pott C. Stolpersteine überwinden – außerhäusliche Gehfähigkeit erreichen. neuroreha 2010; 1: 34-39
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Rensink M et al. Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2009; 65 (4) 737-754
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Robinson CA. Understanding physical factors associated with participation in community ambulation following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33 (12) 1033-1042
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M. Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Tyson S, Selley A. A content analysis of physiotherapy for postural control in people with stroke: An observational study. Disability and Rehabilitation 2006; 28 (13–14) 865-872
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Van Peppen R. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: What’s the evidence?. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004; 18: 833
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Van Vliet PM. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence?. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28 (13–14) 831-840
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Veerbeek JM. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014; 9 (2) e87987
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Winstein C. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 620-628
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Winstein C. Task-oriented training to promote upper extremity recovery. In: Stein J, ed. Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation. New York: demos Medical; 2009
    Google Scholar