J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82(01): 142-148
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1722637
Pediatric Consideration
Review Article

Orbital Surgical Guidelines: Pediatric Considerations

Ann Q. Tran
1   Oculoplastic and Orbital Surgery, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, United States
,
Michael Kazim
1   Oculoplastic and Orbital Surgery, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Pediatric orbital and skull base surgery comprises a wide array of tumors. An understanding of the location of the lesion, nature of the disease, and surrounding anatomy is paramount to surgical planning in these small spaces. The goals of pediatric skull base surgery are to avoid injury to the surrounding structures, minimize cosmetic deformities, and remove some or all of the tumors based on anticipated pathology and biologic cost of removal. Safe surgery on many of these tumors requires an understanding of the location of the lesion relative to the optic nerve or orbit. This is particularly challenging because the dimensions of the orbital confines change continuously as one navigates from rostral to caudal. Management of these tumors may require a multidisciplinary approach including orbital surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, oral maxillofacial surgery, plastic surgery, and interventional neuroradiology.



Publication History

Article published online:
01 March 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Volpe NJ, Jakobiec FA. Pediatric orbital tumors. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1992; 32 (01) 201-221
  • 2 Shields JA, Bakewell B, Augsburger JJ, Donoso LA, Bernardino V. Space-occupying orbital masses in children. A review of 250 consecutive biopsies. Ophthalmology 1986; 93 (03) 379-384
  • 3 Vachha BA, Robson CD. Imaging of pediatric orbital diseases. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2015; 25 (03) 477-501
  • 4 Stricker M, Raphael B, Van der Meulen J. et al. Craniofacial development and growth. In: Craniofacial Malformation. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1990: 61
  • 5 Chang JT, Morrison CS, Styczynski JR, Mehan W, Sullivan SR, Taylor HO. Pediatric orbital depth and growth: a radiographic analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (06) 1988-1991
  • 6 Schick U, Hassler W. Pediatric tumors of the orbit and optic pathway. Pediatr Neurosurg 2003; 38 (03) 113-121
  • 7 Srinivasan A, Bilyk JR. Transcranial approaches to the orbit. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2018; 58 (02) 101-110
  • 8 Düz B, Secer HI, Gonul E. Endoscopic approaches to the orbit: a cadaveric study. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009; 52 (03) 107-113
  • 9 Stapleton AL, Tyler-Kabara EC, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for benign fibro-osseous lesions of the pediatric skull base. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (09) 2199-2203
  • 10 Paluzzi A, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC. et al. “Round-the-clock” surgical access to the orbit. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (01) 12-24
  • 11 DeLong MR, Gandolfi BM, Barr ML, Datta N, Willson TD, Jarrahy R. intraoperative image-guided navigation in craniofacial surgery: review and grading of the current literature. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (02) 465-472
  • 12 Kaderbhai J, Lo W, Rodrigues D. et al. Craniofacial approaches to pediatric orbital tumors. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (04) 1198-1200
  • 13 Laedrach K, Lukes A, Raveh J. Reconstruction of skull base and fronto-orbital defects following tumor resection. Skull Base 2007; 17 (01) 59-72
  • 14 Heher KL, Katowitz JA, Low JE. Unilateral dermis-fat graft implantation in the pediatric orbit. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 14 (02) 81-88
  • 15 Looi A, Kazim M, Cortes M, Rootman J. Orbital reconstruction after eyelid- and conjunctiva-sparing orbital exenteration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 22 (01) 1-6
  • 16 Sokol JA, Baron E, Lantos G, Kazim M. Orbital compression syndrome in sickle cell disease. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 24 (03) 181-184