A Review on Safety and Outcomes of Mucous Fistula Refeeding in Neonates

Abstract

Introduction The utility of mucous fistula refeeding (MFR) in neonates with short bowel syndrome is widely debated. Our purpose is to review MFR and outline methods, reported complications, and clinical outcomes (survival, weight gain, dependence on parenteral nutrition [PN], and time to enteral autonomy).

Materials and Methods We performed a MEDLINE literature search and reference review from January 1980 to May 2020 for terms (“mucous fistula re-feeding” or “enteral re-feeding”) and neonates. We included studies that utilized conventional MFR in the neonatal period. Non-English language articles were excluded.

Results We identified 11 relevant articles. Internationally, there was no consensus on methods of MFR. A total of 197 neonates underwent MFR. Within a single study, four neonates developed major complications; however, the procedure was well tolerated without major complications in 10 of the 11 studies. A mortality of nine patients during MFR highlights the burden of disease within the study population; however, of these, only one was directly attributable to MFR. Minor complications were seldom quantified. Three studies demonstrated a higher rate of weight gain and shorter PN support versus controls. Neonates who underwent MFR had lower chance of anastomotic leak and quicker progression to full feed after reversal versus controls. The influence of microorganisms in MFR was only investigated in one study.

Conclusion Current evidence suggests benefits of MFR; however, an international consensus is yet to be reached on the optimal method. A large prospective study investigating the influence of MFR on the enteric system is required.

Keywords

neonate - short bowel syndrome - mucous fistula refeeding - enteral refeeding - safety

Publication History

Received: 07 June 2020

Accepted: 10 September 2020

Article published online:
10 November 2020

• References

• 1 Wong KK, Lan LC, Lin SC, Chan AW, Tam PK. Mucous fistula refeeding in premature neonates with enterostomies. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2004; 39 (01) 43-45
• 2 Haddock CA, Stanger JD, Albersheim SG, Casey LM, Butterworth SA. Mucous fistula refeeding in neonates with enterostomies. J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50 (05) 779-782
• 3 Puppala BL, Mangurten HH, Kraut JR. et al. Distal ileostomy drip feedings in neonates with short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1985; 4 (03) 489-494
• 4 Pataki I, Szabo J, Varga P. et al. Recycling of bowel content: the importance of the right timing. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (03) 579-584
• 5 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000097
• 6 Richardson L, Banerjee S, Rabe H. What is the evidence on the practice of mucous fistula refeeding in neonates with short bowel syndrome?. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006; 43 (02) 267-270
• 7 Mesas Burgos C, Ehrén H, Finkel Y. Neonatal short bowel syndrome: ‘rectal feeding’ in order to stimulate intestinal growth. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97 (08) 1140-1142
• 8 Pratap A, Kaur N, Shakya VC. et al. Triple tube therapy: a novel enteral feeding technique for short bowel syndrome in low-income countries. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (03) 470-473
• 9 Riggs RL. Pouching and refeeding system for infant with dual bilateral ostomies. J Enterostomal Ther 1987; 14 (01) 35-38
• 10 Lau EC, Fung AC, Wong KK, Tam PK. Beneficial effects of mucous fistula refeeding in necrotizing enterocolitis neonates with enterostomies. J Pediatr Surg 2016; 51 (12) 1914-1916
• 11 Gause CD, Hayashi M, Haney C. et al. Mucous fistula refeeding decreases parenteral nutrition exposure in postsurgical premature neonates. J Pediatr Surg 2016; 51 (11) 1759-1765
• 12 Koike Y, Uchida K, Nagano Y. et al. Enteral refeeding is useful for promoting growth in neonates with enterostomy before stoma closure. J Pediatr Surg 2016; 51 (03) 390-394
• 13 Elliott T, Walton JM. Safety of mucous fistula refeeding in neonates with functional short bowel syndrome: a retrospective review. J Pediatr Surg 2019; 54 (05) 989-992
• 14 Gardner VA, Walton JM, Chessell L. A case study utilizing an enteral refeeding technique in a premature infant with short bowel syndrome. Adv Neonatal Care 2003; 3 (06) 258-268
• 15 Yabe K, Kouchi K, Takenouchi A, Matsuoka A, Korai T, Nakata C. Safety and efficacy of mucous fistula refeeding in low-birth-weight infants with enterostomies. Pediatr Surg Int 2019; 35 (10) 1101-1107
• 16 Schäfer K, Zachariou Z, Löffler W, Daum R. Continuous extracorporeal stool-transport system: a new and economical procedure for transitory short-bowel syndrome in prematures and newborns. Pediatr Surg Int 1997; 12 (01) 73-75
• 17 McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB. et al. Balliol Collaboration. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009; 374 (9695): 1105-1112
• 18 Al-Harbi K, Walton JM, Gardner V, Chessell L, Fitzgerald PG. Mucous fistula refeeding in neonates with short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34 (07) 1100-1103