Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2022; 39(01): 045-053
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714209
Original Article

Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Diabetes Group Prenatal Care

Ebony B. Carter
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Kate Barbier
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Pamela K. Hill
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Denver Health and Hospital, Denver, Colorado
,
Alison G. Cahill
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
,
Graham A. Colditz
4   Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine,, St. Louis, Missouri
,
George A. Macones
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
,
Methodius G. Tuuli
5   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
,
Sara E. Mazzoni
6   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
› Author Affiliations Funding This study received financial support from Administration for Children and Families Healthy Marriage and Relationship grant (90FM0062), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health T32 training grant (5T32HD055172-05), and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (74250).
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of Diabetes Group Prenatal Care to increase patient engagement in diabetes self-care activities.

Study Design A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted at two sites. Inclusion criteria were English or Spanish speaking, type 2 or gestational diabetes, 22 to 34 weeks of gestational age at first study visit, ability to attend group care at specified times, and willingness to be randomized. Exclusion criteria included type 1 diabetes, multiple gestation, major fetal anomaly, serious medical comorbidity, and serious psychiatric illness. Women were randomized to Diabetes Group Prenatal Care or individual prenatal care. The primary outcome was completion of diabetes self-care activities, including diet, exercise, blood sugar testing, and medication adherence. Secondary outcomes included antenatal care characteristics, and maternal, neonatal, and diabetes management outcomes. Analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle.

Results Of 159 eligible women, 84 (53%) consented to participate in the study and were randomized to group (n = 42) or individual (n = 42) prenatal care. Demographic characteristics were similar between study arms. Completion of diabetes self-care activities was similar overall, but women in group care ate the recommended amount of fruits and vegetables on more days per week (5.1 days/week ± 2.0 standard deviation [SD] in group care vs. 3.4 days ± 2.6 SD in individual care; p < 0.01) and gained less weight per week during the study period (0.2 lbs/week [interquartile range: 0–0.7] vs. 0.5 lbs/week [interquartile range: 0.2–0.9]; p = 0.03) than women in individual care. Women with gestational diabetes randomized to group care were 3.5 times more likely to have postpartum glucose tolerance testing than those in individual care (70 vs. 21%; relative risk: 3.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.4–8.8). Other maternal, neonatal, and pregnancy outcomes were similar between study arms.

Conclusion Diabetes group care is feasible and shows promise for decreasing gestational weight gain, improving diet, and increasing postpartum diabetes testing among women with pregnancies complicated by diabetes.

Key Points

  • Women with gestational diabetes in group care were 3.5 times more likely to return for postpartum glucose tolerance testing.

  • Women with gestational diabetes in group care had less gestational weight gain during the study period.

  • Diabetes Group Prenatal Care is a promising intervention to improve outcomes for women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Keywords

gestational diabetes - type 2 diabetes - group care - prenatal care

Note

The study paper was presented as abstract number 979 at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine, January 29 to February 3, 2018, Dallas, TX.

The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation or the Administration for Children and Families.




Publication History

Received: 30 January 2020

Accepted: 05 June 2020

Article published online:
16 July 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Kramer CK, Campbell S, Retnakaran R. Gestational diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular disease in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2019; 62 (06) 905-914
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 190: gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 (02) e49-e64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 ACOG Practice Bulletin No. ACOG practice bulletin no. 201: pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (06) e228-e248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cade WT, Levy PT, Tinius RA. et al. Markers of maternal and infant metabolism are associated with ventricular dysfunction in infants of obese women with type 2 diabetes. Pediatr Res 2017; 82 (05) 768-775
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hunt KJ, Schuller KL. The increasing prevalence of diabetes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2007; 34 (02) 173-199 , vii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Correa A, Bardenheier B, Elixhauser A, Geiss LS, Gregg E. Trends in prevalence of diabetes among delivery hospitalizations, United States, 1993-2009. Matern Child Health J 2015; 19 (03) 635-642
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 ACOG Committee Opinion No. ACOG committee opinion no. 731: group prenatal care. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 (03) e104-e108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Housden L, Wong ST, Dawes M. Effectiveness of group medical visits for improving diabetes care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2013; 185 (13) E635-E644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C. et al. Group prenatal care and preterm birth weight: results from a matched cohort study at public clinics. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102 (5 Pt 1): 1051-1057
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tandon SD, Cluxton-Keller F, Colon L, Vega P, Alonso A. Improved adequacy of prenatal care and healthcare utilization among low-income Latinas receiving group prenatal care. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013; 22 (12) 1056-1061
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Baldwin KA. Comparison of selected outcomes of centering pregnancy versus traditional prenatal care. J Midwifery Womens Health 2006; 51 (04) 266-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Parikh LI, Jelin AC, Iqbal SN. et al. Glycemic control, compliance, and satisfaction for diabetic gravidas in centering group care. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30 (10) 1221-1226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Schellinger MM, Abernathy MP, Amerman B. et al. Improved outcomes for Hispanic women with gestational diabetes using the Centering Pregnancy© Group Prenatal Care Model. Matern Child Health J 2016; 1-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mazzoni SE, Hill PK, Webster KW, Heinrichs GA, Hoffman MC. Group prenatal care for women with gestational diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29 (17) 2852-2856
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gavin JR, Alberti KGMM, Davidson MB. et al; Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003; 26 (Suppl. 01) S5-S20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144 (07) 768-773
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000; 23 (07) 943-950
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (05) 1122-1131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Institute of M, National Research Council Committee to Reexamine IOMPWG. The National Academies Collection: reports funded by National Institutes of Health. In: Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL. eds. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press (US) National Academy of Sciences; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 20 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 101: ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (2 Pt 1): 451-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87 (02) 163-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Korpi-Hyövälti E, Laaksonen DE, Schwab U, Heinonen S, Niskanen L. How can we increase postpartum glucose screening in women at high risk for gestational diabetes mellitus?. Int J Endocrinol 2012; 2012: 519267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Shea AK, Shah BR, Clark HD. et al. The effectiveness of implementing a reminder system into routine clinical practice: does it increase postpartum screening in women with gestational diabetes?. Chronic Dis Can 2011; 31 (02) 58-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar