Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36(03): 309-316
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712472
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Surgical Anatomy for Extended Facelift Techniques

Ozcan Cakmak
1   Private Practice, FACEISTANBUL Facial Plastic Surgery Clinic, İstanbul, Turkey
,
Ismet Emrah Emre
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 June 2020 (online)

Abstract

Preservation of the facial nerve is crucial in any type of facial procedure. This is even more important when performing plastic surgery on the face. An intricate knowledge of the course of the facial nerve is a requisite prior to performing facelifts, regardless of the technique used. The complex relationship of the ligaments and the facial nerve may put the nerve at an increased risk of damage, especially if its anatomy is not fully understood. There are several danger zones during dissection where the nerve is more likely to be injured. These include the areas where the nerve branches become more superficial in the dissection plane, and where they traverse between the retaining ligaments of the face. Addressing these ligaments is crucial, as they prevent the transmission of traction during facelifts. Without sufficient release, a satisfying pull on the soft tissues may be limited. Traditional superficial musculoaponeurotic system techniques such as plication or imbrication do not include surgical release of these attachments. Extended facelift techniques include additional dissection to release the retaining ligaments to obtain a more balanced and healthier look. However, these techniques are often the subject of much debate due to the extended dissection that carries a higher risk of nerve complications. In this article we aim to present the relationship of both the nerve and ligaments with an emphasis on the exact location of these structures, both in regard to one another and to their locations within the facial soft tissues, to perform extended techniques safely.

 
  • References

  • 1 Roostaeian J, Rohrich RJ, Stuzin JM. Anatomical considerations to prevent facial nerve injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (05) 1318-1327
  • 2 Owsley JQ, Agarwal CA. Safely navigating around the facial nerve in three dimensions. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (04) 469-477 , v
  • 3 Pitanguy I, Machado BH. Facial rejuvenation surgery: a retrospective study of 8788 cases. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32 (04) 393-412
  • 4 Sullivan CA, Masin J, Maniglia AJ, Stepnick DW. Complications of rhytidectomy in an otolaryngology training program. Laryngoscope 1999; 109 (2 Pt 1): 198-203
  • 5 Cakmak O, Emre IE, Özücer B. Surgical approach to the thick nasolabial folds, jowls and heavy neck-how to approach and suspend the facial ligaments. Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34 (01) 59-65
  • 6 Jacono AA, Alemi AS, Russell JL. A meta-analysis of complication rates among different SMAS facelift techniques. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (09) 927-942
  • 7 Pitanguy I, Ramos AS. The frontal branch of the facial nerve: the importance of its variations in face lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966; 38 (04) 352-356
  • 8 Babakurban ST, Cakmak O, Kendir S, Elhan A, Quatela VC. Temporal branch of the facial nerve and its relationship to fascial layers. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010; 12 (01) 16-23
  • 9 Zani R, Fadul Jr R, Da Rocha MA, Santos RA, Alves MC, Ferreira LM. Facial nerve in rhytidoplasty: anatomic study of its trajectory in the overlying skin and the most common sites of injury. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 51 (03) 236-242
  • 10 Trinei FA, Januszkiewicz J, Nahai F. The sentinel vein: an important reference point for surgery in the temporal region. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (01) 27-32
  • 11 Choucair RJ, Hamra ST. Extended superficial musculaponeurotic system dissection and composite rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (04) 607-622 , vii
  • 12 Marten TJ. High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (04) 569-603 , vi–vii
  • 13 Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (01) 53-61 , discussion 62–63
  • 14 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (01) 1-13
  • 15 Hamra ST. The zygorbicular dissection in composite rhytidectomy: an ideal midface plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (05) 1646-1657
  • 16 Stuzin JM. MOC-PSSM CME article: face lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (Suppl. 01) 1-19
  • 17 Trussler AP, Hatef D, Broussard GB, Brown S, Barton FE. The viscoelastic properties of the SMAS and its clinical translation: firm support for the high-SMAS rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (03) 757-764
  • 18 Barton Jr FE. The “high SMAS” face lift technique. Aesthet Surg J 2002; 22 (05) 481-486
  • 19 Saylam C, Ucerler H, Orhan M, Ozek C. Anatomic guides to precisely localize the zygomatic branches of the facial nerve. J Craniofac Surg 2006; 17 (01) 50-53
  • 20 Kehrer A, Engelmann S, Ruewe M. , et al. Anatomical study of the zygomatic and buccal branches of the facial nerve: application to facial reanimation procedures. Clin Anat 2019; 32 (04) 480-488
  • 21 Alghoul M, Bitik O, McBride J, Zins JE. Relationship of the zygomatic facial nerve to the retaining ligaments of the face: the Sub-SMAS danger zone. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (02) 245e-252e
  • 22 Cakmak O, Özücer B, Aktekin M, Özkurt FE, Al-Salman R, Emre IE. Modified composite-flap facelift combined with finger-assisted malar elevation (FAME): a cadaver study. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (12) 1269-1279
  • 23 Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL, Baker TM. Extended SMAS dissection as an approach to midface rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22 (02) 295-311
  • 24 Cakmak O. Clarification regarding the modified finger-assisted malar elevation (FAME) technique. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (05) NP161-NP162
  • 25 Mendelson B, Wong CH. Response to “Clarification regarding the modified finger-assisted malar elevation (FAME) technique”. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (05) NP163-NP164
  • 26 Mendelson B, Wong CH. Commentary on: modified composite-flap facelift combined with finger-assisted malar elevation (FAME): a cadaver study. Aesthet Surg J 2018; 38 (12) 1284-1288
  • 27 Wong CH, Mendelson B. Facial soft-tissue spaces and retaining ligaments of the midcheek: defining the premaxillary space. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (01) 49-56
  • 28 Aston SJ. . The FAME procedure. Presented at: the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons; November 9–13, 1996; Dallas, TX
  • 29 Erbil KM, Uz A, Hayran M, Mas N, Senan S, Tuncel M. The relationship of the parotid duct to the buccal and zygomatic branches of the facial nerve; an anatomical study with parameters of clinical interest. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2007; 66 (02) 109-114
  • 30 Pogrel MA, Schmidt B, Ammar A. The relationship of the buccal branch of the facial nerve to the parotid duct. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54 (01) 71-73
  • 31 Mendelson BC, Wong CH. Surgical anatomy of the middle premasseter space and its application in sub-SMAS face lift surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (01) 57-64
  • 32 Mendelson BC, Jacobson SR. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek: facial layers, spaces, and the midcheek segments. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (03) 395-404 , discussion 393
  • 33 Yang HM, Kim HJ, Park HW. , et al. Revisiting the topographic anatomy of the marginal mandibular branch of facial nerve relating to the surgical approach. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (09) 977-982
  • 34 Touré G, Tran de Fremicourt MK, Randriamanantena T, Vlavonou S, Priano V, Vacher C. Vascular and nerve relations of the marginal mandibular nerve of the face: anatomy and clinical relevance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (03) 888-899
  • 35 Woltmann M, Faveri Rd, Sgrott EA. Anatomosurgical study of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve for submandibular surgical approach. Braz Dent J 2006; 17 (01) 71-74
  • 36 Karapinar U, Kilic C, Cetin B, Saglam O, Dursun E, Durmus M. The course of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve in adult cadavers. An anatomic study. Saudi Med J 2013; 34 (04) 364-368
  • 37 Saylam C, Ucerler H, Orhan M, Uckan A, Ozek C. Localization of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve. J Craniofac Surg 2007; 18 (01) 137-142
  • 38 Batra AP, Mahajan A, Gupta K. Marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve: an anatomical study. Indian J Plast Surg 2010; 43 (01) 60-64
  • 39 Huettner F, Rueda S, Ozturk CN. , et al. The relationship of the marginal mandibular nerve to the mandibular osseocutaneous ligament and lesser ligaments of the lower face. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (02) 111-120
  • 40 Daane SP, Owsley JQ. Incidence of cervical branch injury with “marginal mandibular nerve pseudo-paralysis” in patients undergoing face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (07) 2414-2418
  • 41 Jacono AA, Talei B. Vertical neck lifting. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (02) 285-316
  • 42 Sinno S, Thorne CH. Cervical branch of facial nerve: an explanation for recurrent platysma bands following necklift and platysmaplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (01) 1-7
  • 43 Mustoe TA, Rawlani V, Zimmerman H. Modified deep plane rhytidectomy with a lateral approach to the neck: an alternative to submental incision and dissection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (01) 357-370
  • 44 Salinas NL, Jackson O, Dunham B, Bartlett SP. Anatomical dissection and modified Sihler stain of the lower branches of the facial nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (06) 1905-1915
  • 45 Domet MA, Connor NP, Heisey DM, Hartig GK. Anastomoses between the cervical branch of the facial nerve and the transverse cervical cutaneous nerve. Am J Otolaryngol 2005; 26 (03) 168-171