J Hand Microsurg 2022; 14(01): 39-46
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710412
Original Article

Can the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire Be Used as a Screening Tool Among a Potentially High-Risk Population in Singapore?

Dinesh Sirisena
1   Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
,
Ivan Lim
2   Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
,
Shauna Sim
1   Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
,
Pei-Yein Tong
1   Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
,
Vaikunthan Rajaratnam
1   Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Introduction Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) causes significant morbidity with delayed diagnosis or management. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) is validated for monitoring CTS following diagnosis; however, it has not been trialed in a screening capacity. The study aimed to determine whether it can be utilized when screening a focused population in Singapore.

Materials and Methods A single-center survey-based study was undertaken prospectively to identify whether positive symptoms could be identified among nursing and administrative staff.

Results A total of 605 staff responded. Positive symptoms were identified in 317 (52.4%) of participants and 23 (3.8%) reported them to be severe. Functional limitations were detected in 157 (26.0%) of participants with 5 (0.8%) reporting these as severe. Positive symptoms (84.9%) and functional limitations (81.5%) were more prevalent among nursing staff. Cronbach’s α scores (0.896 for symptoms and 0.84 for functional limitations) suggested good reliability in matching symptoms and functional limitations.

Conclusion The BCTQ can potentially be implemented as a screening tool for CTS among those without a prior diagnosis. It has a greater depth of questioning with symptomatic and functional limitations considered, and in situations where a formal diagnosis is subsequently made, the same tool can be subsequently used for progression tracking pre- and post-treatment.

Level of Evidence  This is a Level II study.



Publication History

Article published online:
02 May 2020

© 2020. Society of Indian Hand & Microsurgeons. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Dale AM, Harris-Adamson C, Rempel D. et al. Prevalence and incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome in US working populations: pooled analysis of six prospective studies. Scand J Work Environ Health 2013; 39 (05) 495-505
  • 2 USDL. Non-Fatal Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Requiring Days Away from Work, 2010. In: Statistics BoL, ed: US Department of Labour 2011: 1-32
  • 3 Lim YT, Ang CL, Cheong TBB. et al. Fee Benchmarks Advisory Committee Report. In: Health Mo, ed. Singapore: Ministry of Health 2018: 1-50
  • 4 Solomon DH, Katz JN, Bohn R, Mogun H, Avorn J. Nonoccupational risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14 (05) 310-314
  • 5 Stapleton MJ. Occupation and carpal tunnel syndrome. ANZ J Surg 2006; 76 (06) 494-496
  • 6 Koskimies K, Färkkilä M, Pyykkö I. et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome in vibration disease. Br J Ind Med 1990; 47 (06) 411-416
  • 7 Monsell FP, Tillman RM. Shearer’s wrist: the carpal tunnel syndrome as an occupational disease in professional sheep shearers. Br J Ind Med 1992; 49 (08) 594-595
  • 8 Burt S, Crombie K, Jin Y, Wurzelbacher S, Ramsey J, Deddens J. Workplace and individual risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome. Occup Environ Med 2011; 68 (12) 928-933
  • 9 Shi Q, Bobos P, Lalone EA, Warren L, MacDermid JC. Comparison of the short-term and long-term effects of surgery and nonsurgical intervention in treating carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hand (N Y) 2020; 15 (01) 13-22
  • 10 Evanoff B, Gardner BT, Strickland JR, Buckner-Petty S, Franzblau A, Dale AM. Long-term symptomatic, functional, and work outcomes of carpal tunnel syndrome among construction workers. Am J Ind Med 2016; 59 (05) 357-368
  • 11 Sucher BM, Schreiber AL. Carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2014; 25 (02) 229-247
  • 12 Jablecki CK, Andary MT, So YT, Wilkins DE, Williams FH. AAEM Quality Assurance Committee. ature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1993; 16 (12) 1392-1414
  • 13 Pimentel BFR, Faloppa F, Tamaoki MJS, Belloti JC. Effectiveness of ultrasonography and nerve conduction studies in the diagnosing of carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical trial on accuracy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19 (01) 115
  • 14 Werner RA, Franzblau A, Albers JW, Buchele H, Armstrong TJ. Use of screening nerve conduction studies for predicting future carpal tunnel syndrome. Occup Environ Med 1997; 54 (02) 96-100
  • 15 Kamath V, Stothard J. A clinical questionnaire for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br] 2003; 28 (05) 455-459
  • 16 Bland JD, Weller P, Rudolfer S. Questionnaire tools for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome from the patient history. Muscle Nerve 2011; 44 (05) 757-762
  • 17 Chung KC, Hamill JB, Walters MR, Hayward RA. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 42 (06) 619-622
  • 18 Levine D, Simmons BP, Koris MJ. et al. A self-administered the assessment of severity in carpal questionnaire for of symptoms and functional status tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75 (11) 1585-1592
  • 19 Mahmood B, Chongshu C, Qiu X, Messing S, Hammert WC. Comparison of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and PROMIS Instruments in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44 (05) 366-373
  • 20 Atroshi I, Johnsson R, Sprinchorn A. Self-administered outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome. Reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluated in 102 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69 (01) 82-88
  • 21 Leite JC, Jerosch-Herold C, Song F. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 78
  • 22 Bougea A, Zambelis T, Voskou P. et al. Reliability and validation of the Greek Version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Hand (N Y) 2018; 13 (05) 593-599
  • 23 Multanen J, Ylinen J, Karjalainen T, Kautiainen H, Repo JP, Häkkinen A. Reliability and Validity of The Finnish Version of The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire among surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Scand J Surg 2019; 1457496919851607
  • 24 Hamzeh HH, Alworikat NA. Cross cultural adaptation, reliability and construct validity of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire in standard Arabic language. Disabil Rehabil 2019
  • 25 Park DJ, Kang JH, Lee JW. et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire: its clinical evaluation in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome following local corticosteroid injection. J Korean Med Sci 2013; 28 (07) 1095-1099
  • 26 Lue YJ, Lu YM, Lin GT, Liu YF. Validation of the Chinese version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil 2014; 24 (01) 139-145
  • 27 Lue YJ, Wu YY, Liu YF, Lin GT, Lu YM. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil 2015; 25 (04) 717-724
  • 28 Raosoft.Inc. Sample size calculator. Available at: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html. Published 2004. Accessed April 27, 2020
  • 29 Ghasemi-Rad M, Nosair E, Vegh A. et al. A handy review of carpal tunnel syndrome: from anatomy to diagnosis and treatment. World J Radiol 2014; 6 (06) 284-300
  • 30 Demiryurek BE, Aksoy Gündoğdu A. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome and its correlation with pain amongst female hairdressers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2018; 31 (03) 333-339
  • 31 Rayan GM. Understanding and managing carpal tunnel syndrome. J Musculoskelet Med 1999; 16: 654-663
  • 32 Shiri R, Falah-Hassani K. Computer use and carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2015; 349 (1-2) 15-19
  • 33 Çiftdemir M, Çopuroğlu C, Özcan M, Çavdar L. Carpal tunnel syndrome in manual tea harvesters. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2013; 24 (01) 12-17
  • 34 De FGCM Kleermaeker, Boogaarts HD, Meulstee J, Verhagen WIM. Minimal clinically important difference for the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire: new insights and review of literature. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2019; 44 (03) 283-289
  • 35 Castro Ado, Skare TL, Nassif PA, Sakuma AK, Barros WH. Sonographic diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a study in 200 hospital workers. Radiol Bras 2015; 48 (05) 287-291
  • 36 Bellomo R, Warrillow SJ, Reade MC. Why we should be wary of single-center trials. Crit Care Med 2009; 37 (12) 3114-3119
  • 37 PLoS. Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0129918.s002&type=supplementary. Accessed April 27, 2020