An Evaluation of the Source and Content of Kienböck’s Disease Information on the Internet

Abstract

Introduction The use of the internet for health-related information continues to increase. Because of its decentralized structure, information contained within the World Wide Web is not regulated. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the type and quality of information on the internet regarding Kienböck’s disease. We hypothesized that the information available on the World Wide Web would be of good informational value.

Materials and Methods The search phrase “Kienböck’s disease” was entered into the five most commonly used internet search engines. The top 49 nonsponsored Web sites identified by each search engine were collected. Each unique Web site was evaluated for authorship and content, and an informational score ranging from 0 to 100 points was assigned. Each site was reviewed by two fellowship-trained hand surgeons.

Results The informational mean score for the sites was 45.5 out of a maximum of 100 points. Thirty-one (63%) of the Web sites evaluated were authored by an academic institution or a physician. Twelve (24%) of the sites were commercial sites or sold commercial products. The remaining 6 Web sites (12%) were noninformational, provided unconventional information, or had lay authorship. The average informational score on the academic or physician authored Web sites was 54 out of 100 points, compared with 38 out of 100 for the remainder of the sites. This difference was statistically significant.

Conclusion While the majority of the Web sites evaluated were authored by academic institutions or physicians, the informational value contained within is of limited completeness. More than one quarter of the Web sites were commercial in nature. There remains significant room for improvement in the completeness of information available for common hand conditions in the internet.

Keywords

content - Kienböck - information - internet - quality

Publication History

Article published online:
07 April 2020

• References

• 1 Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL. et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165 (22) 2618-2624
• 2 Swoboda CM, Van Hulle JM, McAlearney AS, Huerta TR. Odds of talking to healthcare providers as the initial source of healthcare information: updated cross-sectional results from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). BMC Fam Pract 2018; 19 (01) 146
• 3 Wagner JP, Chung KC. A historical report on Robert Kienbock (1871-1953) and Kienbock’s disease. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30 (06) 1117-1121
• 4 Kolovich GP, Kalu CM, Ruff ME. Current trends in treatment of Kienböck disease: a survey of hand surgeons. Hand (N Y) 2016; 11 (01) 113-118
• 5 Danoff JR, Cuellar DO, O J. Strauch RJ. The management of Kienböck disease: a survey of the ASSH membership. J Wrist Surg 2015; 4 (01) 43-48
• 6 Beredjiklian PK. Kienböck’s disease. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (01) 167-175
• 7 Lutsky K, Beredjiklian PK. Kienböck disease. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (09) 1942-1952
• 8 Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ, Steinberg DR, Bernstein J. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the internet. The case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82 (11) 1540-1543
• 9 Lutsky K, Bernstein J, Beredjiklian P. Quality of information on the Internet about carpal tunnel syndrome: an update. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (08) e1038-e1041
• 10 Tan SS, Goonawardene N. Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (01) e9
• 11 MacLeod MG, Hoppe DJ, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Philippon MJ, Ayeni OR. YouTube as an information source for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of video content. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (01) 136-142
• 12 DeFroda SF, Bokshan SL, Vutescu ES, Sullivan K, Owens BD. Accuracy of internet images of ligamentous knee injuries. Phys Sportsmed 2019; 47 (01) 129-131
• 13 Nwachukwu BU, Rauck RC, Kahlenberg CA. et al. The quality of online resources available to patients interested in knee biologic therapies is poor. HSS J 2018; 14 (03) 322-327
• 14 Smith JT, Pate OL, Guss D, Lee JT, Chiodo CP, Bluman EM. Internet information quality for ten common foot and ankle diagnoses. Foot Ankle Surg 2012; 18 (03) 198-202
• 15 Starman JS, Gettys FK, Capo JA, Fleischli JE, Norton HJ, Karunakar MA. Quality and content of internet-based information for ten common orthopaedic sports medicine diagnoses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (07) 1612-1618
• 16 Winship B, Grisell M, Yang CB, Chen RX, Bauer AS. The quality of pediatric orthopaedic information on the internet. J Pediatr Orthop 2014; 34 (04) 474-477
• 17 Cassidy JT, Baker JF. Orthopaedic patient information on the World Wide Web: an essential review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98 (04) 325-338
• 18 Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53 (02) 105-111
• 19 Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: Caveant lector et viewor–Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 1997; 277 (15) 1244-1245
• 20 Boyer C, Selby M, Scherrer JR, Appel RD. The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites. Comput Biol Med 1998; 28 (05) 603-610
• 21 Kamal RN, Paci GM, Daniels AH, Gosselin M, Rainbow MJ, Weiss AP. Quality of internet health information on thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. R I Med J (2013) 2014; 97 (04) 31-35