Approximations to the Tibial Distal Anatomical Axis in the Sagittal Plane

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to compare approximations to the tibial distal anatomical axis (DAA) with regression lines for the symmetric axis of the tibia, and to identify an optimal approximation for surgical planning of osteotomies for the management of canine cruciate ligament deficiency.

Study Design Prospective radiographic study of 20 canine tibiae. Using curve-fitting and the symmetric axis technique, the true anatomical axis was identified for each tibia. Regression lines were calculated for the distal 67% and distal 50% subsections of this axis. Angular deviations between these lines and DAA approximations were calculated and compared with to find the closest approximations.

Results The DAA approximations based on the distal 50% rather than the distal 67% of the tibia had smaller maximal deviations from the true axis. Landmarks at 50% and 75% of tibial length exhibited greater deviations than those at 50% and 95% or 100%.

Conclusion The DAA landmarks should be restricted to the distal half of the tibia. Use of a distal landmark either just proximal to the distal metaphyseal flare of the tibia or at the mid-point of the distal articular surface is to be preferred. In this way, the DAA will better reflect the true anatomical axis of the distal tibia.

Keywords

radiography - osteotomy - surgical planning - tibia - distal anatomical axis

• References

• 1 Raske M, Hulse D, Beale B, Saunders WB, Kishi E, Kunze C. Stabilization of the CORA based leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament injury using a bone plate augmented with a headless compression screw. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (06) 759-764
• 2 Guénégo L, Payot M, Charrut P, Verwaerde P. Alignment of the anatomical and mechanical axes during cranial closing wedge osteotomy (AMA-based CCWO) for treatment of CCL disease in 182 dogs: results and complications. Proceedings of the 18th European Society of Veterinary Orthopaedics and Traumatology Congress; London; September 8–10, 2016:383–384
• 3 Bruecker KA. CORA-based TPLO for steep tibial plateau angle. Proceedings of the 5th World Veterinary Orthopaedic Congress; Barcelona, Spain; September 12–15, 2018: 158–160
• 4 Guénégo L, Payot M, Charru P, Verwaerde P. Comparison of tibial anatomical-mechanical axis angle between predisposed dogs and dogs at low risk for cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet J 2017; 225: 35-41
• 5 Petazzoni M, Jaeger G. Atlas of Clinical Goniometry and Radiographic Measurements of the Canine Pelvic Limb. 2nd ed. Milan: Merial; 2008: 63
• 6 Osmond CS, Marcellin-Little DJ, Harrysson OLA, Kidd LB. Morphometric assessment of the proximal portion of the tibia in dogs with and without cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47 (02) 136-141
• 7 Glassman M, Hofmeister E, Weh JM. , et al. Radiographic quantitative assessment of caudal proximal tibial angulation in 100 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet Surg 2011; 40 (07) 830-838
• 8 Piras A. Early clinical experience with CORA based tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (CBTPLO) in toy breed dogs. Proceedings of the 16th European Society of Veterinary Orthopaedics and Traumatology Congress; Bologna, Italy; September 12–15, 2012: 334–336
• 9 Miles JE, Mortensen M, Svalastoga EL, Eriksen T. A comparison of anatomical lateral distal femoral angles obtained with four femoral axis methods in canine femora. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (03) 193-198
• 10 Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39 (02) 175-191
• 11 Paley D. Sagittal plane deformities. In: Paley D, Herzenberg JE. , eds. Principles of Deformity Correction. Berlin: Springer; 2002: 155-174