Semin Speech Lang 2019; 40(04): 256-271
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692962
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Cognitive Control along the Language Spectrum: From the Typical Bilingual Child to Language Impairment

Klara Marton
1   Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York
2   Department of Communication Arts, Sciences and Disorders, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, New York; New York
3   Bárczi Gusztáv Faculty of Special Needs Education, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
,
Thorfun Gehebe
1   Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York
,
Lia Pazuelo
1   Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 July 2019 (online)

Abstract

Cognitive control refers to the ability to perform goal-directed behaviors in the presence of other compelling actions or in the face of habitual practices. Cognitive control functions play a critical role in children's language processing and literacy development. In recent years, many clinicians have expanded their assessment and treatment to target specific cognitive skills. Our goal is to provide a review of recent findings on cognitive control functions in children with different language status (i.e., monolingual and bilingual children with and without language impairment). While children with language impairment show performance deficits in specific cognitive functions (e.g., working memory updating and interference control), typically developing bilingual children often outperform their monolingual peers in cognitive control tasks. However, the relationship between bilingualism and cognitive control has been controversial. Several factors that influence these variations are discussed. Given the findings on the joint impact of bilingualism and language impairment on cognitive control functions, we identify conditions in which bilingualism attenuates the negative effects of the language deficit and conditions in which language impairment has a stronger effect than bilingualism. Critical issues of bilingual assessment, suggestions, and future directions are discussed.

Disclosures

Financial: Funding sources include the following grants awarded to the first author.


 1. CUNY Interdisciplinary Research Award (CIRG), “The effects of bilingualism, language impairment, and socio-economic status on children's cognitive-linguistic performance,” 2016–2017.


 2. PSC-CUNY Research Award—44, “Resistance to interference in children with language impairment,” 2013–2014.


 3. 1 R15 DC009040–01, NIH-NIDCD, “The impact of inhibition control on working memory in children with SLI,” 2007–2011.


Nonfinancial: The authors do not have nonfinancial relationships to disclose regarding the study.


 
  • References

  • 1 Volkers N. Diverging views on language disorders. ASHA Lead. December 2018. Available at: https://leader.pubs.asha.org/doi/abs/10.1044/leader.FTR1.23122018.44 . Accessed June 1, 2019
  • 2 Cohen JD. , ed. Cognitive control. Core constructs and current considerations. In: The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Control. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017: 3-28
  • 3 Demetriou A, Spanoudis G, Shayer M, Mouyi A, Kazi S, Platsidou M. Cycles in speed-working memory-G relations: towards a developmental–differential theory of the mind. Intelligence 2013; 41 (01) 34-50
  • 4 Robbins TW, Kehagia AA. , eds. The neurochemical modulation of prefrontal control processes. In: The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Control. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017: 334-354
  • 5 Towse JN, Hitch GJ, Hutton U. A reevaluation of working memory capacity in children. J Mem Lang 1998; 39 (02) 195-217
  • 6 Barrouillet P, Camos V. Developmental increase in working memory span: Resource sharing or temporal decay?. J Mem Lang 2001; 45 (01) 1-20
  • 7 Hasher L, Zacks RT. , eds. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In: The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. Vol 22. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1988: 193-225
  • 8 Engle RW. Working memory capacity as executive attention. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2002; 11 (01) 19-23
  • 9 Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognit Psychol 2000; 41 (01) 49-100
  • 10 Martin I, McDonald S. Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain Lang 2003; 85 (03) 451-466
  • 11 van Veen V, Carter CS. The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiol Behav 2002; 77 (4-5): 477-482
  • 12 Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 2001; 108 (03) 624-652
  • 13 Hyland PK, Lee RA, Mills MJ. Mindfulness at work: a new approach to improving individual and organizational performance. Ind Organ Psychol 2015; 8 (04) 576-602
  • 14 Vandenbroucke L, Verschueren K, Baeyens D. The development of executive functioning across the transition to first grade and its predictive value for academic achievement. Learn Instr 2017; 49: 103-112
  • 15 Shiffrin RM, Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol Rev 1977; 84 (02) 127
  • 16 Notebaert W, Houtman F, Opstal FV, Gevers W, Fias W, Verguts T. Post-error slowing: an orienting account. Cognition 2009; 111 (02) 275-279
  • 17 Danielmeier C, Ullsperger M. Post-error adjustments. Front Psychol 2011; 2: 233
  • 18 Campbell DJ. Task complexity: a review and analysis. Acad Manage Rev 1988; 13 (01) 40-52
  • 19 Bonifacci P, Giombini L, Bellocchi S, Contento S. Speed of processing, anticipation, inhibition and working memory in bilinguals. Dev Sci 2011; 14 (02) 256-269
  • 20 Marton K, Campanelli L, Scheuer J, Yoon J, Eichorn N. Executive function profiles in children with and without specific language impairment. Riv Psicolinguist Appl 2012; 12 (03) 57-73
  • 21 Oberauer K, Lewandowsky S, Farrell S, Jarrold C, Greaves M. Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span. Psychon Bull Rev 2012; 19 (05) 779-819
  • 22 Roncadin C, Pascual-Leone J, Rich JB, Dennis M. Developmental relations between working memory and inhibitory control. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2007; 13 (01) 59-67
  • 23 Marton K, Campanelli L, Eichorn N, Scheuer J, Yoon J. Information processing and proactive interference in children with and without specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2014; 57 (01) 106-119
  • 24 Henry LA, Messer DJ, Nash G. Executive functioning in children with specific language impairment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2012; 53 (01) 37-45
  • 25 Pauls LJ, Archibald LM. Executive functions in children with specific language impairment: a meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2016; 59 (05) 1074-1086
  • 26 Marton K, Kelmenson L, Pinkhasova M. Inhibition control and working memory capacity in children with SLI. Psikhologyah 2007; 50 (02) 110-121
  • 27 Ellis Weismer S, Evans J, Hesketh LJ. An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42 (05) 1249-1260
  • 28 Lilienthal L, Rose NS, Tamez E, Myerson J, Hale S. Individuals with low working memory spans show greater interference from irrelevant information because of poor source monitoring, not greater activation. Mem Cognit 2015; 43 (03) 357-366
  • 29 Norbury CF. Barking up the wrong tree? Lexical ambiguity resolution in children with language impairments and autistic spectrum disorders. J Exp Child Psychol 2005; 90 (02) 142-171
  • 30 Epstein B, Shafer VL, Melara RD, Schwartz RG. Can children with SLI detect cognitive conflict? Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2014; 57 (04) 1453-1467
  • 31 Spaulding TJ. Investigating mechanisms of suppression in preschool children with specific language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2010; 53 (03) 725-738
  • 32 Marton K. Visuo-spatial processing and executive functions in children with specific language impairment. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2008; 43 (02) 181-200
  • 33 Crosbie S, Holm A, Dodd B. Cognitive flexibility in children with and without speech disorder. Child Lang Teach Ther 2009; 25 (02) 250-270
  • 34 Tropper B. An Electrophysiological and Behavioral Examination of Cognitive Control in Children with Specific Language Impairment. [PhD Dissertation]. New York, NY: Graduate Center, City University of New York; 2009
  • 35 Bjorklund DF, Harnishfeger KK. The resources construct in cognitive development: Diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition. Dev Rev 1990; 10 (01) 48-71
  • 36 Blackwell KA, Chatham CH, Wiseheart M, Munakata Y. A developmental window into trade-offs in executive function: the case of task switching versus response inhibition in 6-year-olds. Neuropsychologia 2014; 62: 356-364
  • 37 Bialystok E, Feng X. Language proficiency and executive control in proactive interference: evidence from monolingual and bilingual children and adults. Brain Lang 2009; 109 (2-3): 93-100
  • 38 Filippi R, Morris J, Richardson FM. , et al. Bilingual children show an advantage in controlling verbal interference during spoken language comprehension. Biling (Camb Engl) 2015; 18 (03) 490-501
  • 39 Bialystok E, Viswanathan M. Components of executive control with advantages for bilingual children in two cultures. Cognition 2009; 112 (03) 494-500
  • 40 Dreisbach G. Mechanisms of cognitive control: the functional role of task rules. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2012; 21 (04) 227-231
  • 41 Luk G, Bialystok E. Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: interaction between language proficiency and usage. J Cogn Psychol (Hove) 2013; 25 (05) 605-621
  • 42 Kohnert K. Second language acquisition: success factors in sequential bilingualism. ASHA Lead 2008; 13 (02) 10-13
  • 43 Green DW, Abutalebi J. Language control in bilinguals: the adaptive control hypothesis. J Cogn Psychol (Hove) 2013; 25 (05) 515-530
  • 44 Engel de Abreu PMJ, Cruz-Santos A, Tourinho CJ, Martin R, Bialystok E. Bilingualism enriches the poor: enhanced cognitive control in low-income minority children. Psychol Sci 2012; 23 (11) 1364-1371
  • 45 Marton K, Goral M, Campanelli L, Yoon J, Obler LK. Executive control mechanisms in bilingualism: beyond speed of processing. Biling Lang Cogn 2017; 20 (03) 613-631
  • 46 Bialystok E. Bilingualism: the good, the bad, and the indifferent. Biling Lang Cogn 2009; 12 (01) 3-11
  • 47 Iluz-Cohen P, Armon-Lotem S. Language proficiency and executive control in bilingual children. Biling Lang Cogn 2013; 16 (04) 884-899
  • 48 Marton K, Campanelli L. Associations between language proficiency and cognitive control in children: The application of a drift-diffusion model. In: Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society. 2018. ;23: 222
  • 49 Adesope OO, Lavin T, Thompson T, Ungerleider C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Rev Educ Res 2010; 80 (02) 207-245
  • 50 Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Luk G. Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2012; 16 (04) 240-250
  • 51 de Bruin A, Treccani B, Della Sala S. Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: an example of publication bias?. Psychol Sci 2015; 26 (01) 99-107
  • 52 Paap KR, Johnson HA, Sawi O. Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex 2015; 69: 265-278
  • 53 Marton K. Executive control in bilingual children: factors that influence the outcomes. Linguist Approaches Biling 2016; 6 (05) 575-589
  • 54 Bonfieni M, Branigan HP, Pickering MJ, Sorace A. Language experience modulates bilingual language control: the effect of proficiency, age of acquisition, and exposure on language switching. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2019; 193: 160-170
  • 55 Marton K, Yoon J. Cross-linguistic investigations of language impairments. In: Brooks P, Kempe V. , eds. Encyclopedia of Language Development. Sage Publications, Inc; 2014: 123-127
  • 56 Jacobson PF, Schwartz RG. Morphology in incipient bilingual Spanish-speaking preschool children with specific language impairment. Appl Psycholinguist 2002; 23 (01) 23-41
  • 57 Marinis T. On-line processing of passives in L1 and L2 children. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA); 2007 :265–276
  • 58 Paradis J, Crago M, Genesee F, Rice M. French-English bilingual children with SLI: how do they compare with their monolingual peers?. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003; 46 (01) 113-127
  • 59 Gutiérrez-Clellen VF, Cereijido GS, Leone AE. Codeswitching in bilingual children with specific language impairment. Int J Biling 2009; 13 (01) 91-109
  • 60 Rothweiler M, Chilla S, Clahsen H. Subject-verb agreement in specific language impairment: A study of monolingual and bilingual German-speaking children. Biling Lang Cogn 2012; 15 (01) 39-57
  • 61 Paradis J. Bilingual children with specific language impairment: theoretical and applied issues. Appl Psycholinguist 2007; 28 (03) 551-564
  • 62 Verhoeven L, Steenge J, van Weerdenburg M, van Balkom H. Assessment of second language proficiency in bilingual children with specific language impairment: a clinical perspective. Res Dev Disabil 2011; 32 (05) 1798-1807
  • 63 Leonard LB. Children with specific language impairment and their contribution to the study of language development. J Child Lang 2014; 41 (01) (Suppl. 01) 38-47
  • 64 Engel de Abreu PMJ, Cruz-Santos A, Puglisi ML. Specific language impairment in language-minority children from low-income families. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2014; 49 (06) 736-747
  • 65 Laloi A, de Jong J, Baker A. Can executive functioning contribute to the diagnosis of SLI in bilingual children?. Linguist Approaches Biling 2017; 7 (03) 431-459
  • 66 Marton K, Scheuer J, Ouchikh Y, Yerimbetova Z, Pazuelo L. Joint effects of bilingualism and specific language impairment: interaction between speed of processing and cognitive control. Presented at the 2nd BiSLI Conference, University of Reading, England; 2018
  • 67 Gutierrez-Clellen VF, Kreiter J. Understanding child bilingual acquisition using parent and teacher reports. Appl Psycholinguist 2003; 24 (02) 267-288
  • 68 Marian V, Blumenfeld HK, Kaushanskaya M. The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007; 50 (04) 940-967
  • 69 Wiig EH, Secord WA, Semel E. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Preschool 2. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt/Psych Corp; 2004
  • 70 Goralnik E. Goralnik Diagnostic Test for Hebrew. Matan, Even Yehuda; 1995
  • 71 Butler YG, Lee J. The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Lang Test 2010; 27 (01) 5-31
  • 72 Bedore LM, Peña ED, Summers CL. , et al. The measure matters: language dominance profiles across measures in Spanish-English bilingual children. Biling (Camb Engl) 2012; 15 (03) 616-629
  • 73 Gazman Z, Pazuelo L, Scheuer J, Campanelli L, Ouchikh Y, Marton K. Best practices in assessing language proficiency in bilingual children with and without DLD. In: Abstracts 12th International Symposium on Bilingualism. The next generation, 194–195
  • 74 Lugo-Neris MJ, Peña ED, Bedore LM, Gillam RB. Utility of a language screening measure for predicting risk for language impairment in bilinguals. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2015; 24 (03) 426-437
  • 75 DeKeyser R, Larson-Hall J. What does the critical period really mean? In: Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005: 88-108
  • 76 Kotz SA. A critical review of ERP and fMRI evidence on L2 syntactic processing. Brain Lang 2009; 109 (2-3): 68-74
  • 77 Luk G, Sa ED, Bialystok E. Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control?. Biling Lang Cogn 2011; 14 (04) 588-595
  • 78 Yang H, Hartanto A, Yang S. The importance of bilingual experience in assessing bilingual advantages in executive functions. Cortex 2016; 75: 237-240
  • 79 Birdsong D. Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language 1992; 68 (04) 706-755
  • 80 Weber-Fox CM, Neville HJ. Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. J Cogn Neurosci 1996; 8 (03) 231-256
  • 81 Kroll JF, Dussias PE, Bice K, Perrotti L. Bilingualism, mind, and brain. Annu Rev Linguist 2015; 1: 377-394
  • 82 Kapa LL, Colombo J. Attentional control in early and later bilingual children. Cogn Dev 2013; 28 (03) 233-246
  • 83 Tao L, Marzecová A, Taft M, Asanowicz D, Wodniecka Z. The efficiency of attentional networks in early and late bilinguals: the role of age of acquisition. Front Psychol 2011; 2: 123
  • 84 Kalia V, Wilbourn MP, Ghio K. Better early or late? Examining the influence of age of exposure and language proficiency on executive function in early and late bilinguals. J Cogn Psychol 2014; 26: 699-713
  • 85 Luk G, Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Grady CL. Lifelong bilingualism maintains white matter integrity in older adults. J Neurosci 2011; 31 (46) 16808-16813
  • 86 Dussias PE, Sagarra N. The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish-English bilinguals. Biling Lang Cogn 2007; 10 (01) 101-116
  • 87 Hoff E, Core C, Place S, Rumiche R, Señor M, Parra M. Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. J Child Lang 2012; 39 (01) 1-27
  • 88 Pliatsikas C, Marinis T. Processing empty categories in a second language: when naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap. Biling Lang Cogn 2013; 16 (01) 167-182
  • 89 Ribot KM, Hoff E, Burridge A. Language use contributes to expressive language growth: evidence from bilingual children. Child Dev 2018; 89 (03) 929-940
  • 90 Caesar LG, Kohler PD. The state of school-based bilingual assessment: actual practice versus recommended guidelines. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2007; 38 (03) 190-200
  • 91 Laing SP, Kamhi A. Alternative assessment of language and literacy in culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2003; 34 (01) 44-55
  • 92 Martin D. Language Disabilities in Cultural and Linguistic Diversity. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters; 2009
  • 93 Stow C, Dodd B. Providing an equitable service to bilingual children in the UK: a review. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2003; 38 (04) 351-377
  • 94 Bialystok E, Luk G. Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual adults. Biling Lang Cogn 2012; 15 (02) 397-401
  • 95 Bialystok E, Luk G, Peets KF, Yang S. Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Biling (Camb Engl) 2010; 13 (04) 525-531
  • 96 Dunn LM, Dunn DM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-4. 4th ed. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson; 2007
  • 97 Olabarrieta-Landa L, Rivera D, Ibáñez-Alfonso JA. , et al. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III: Normative data for Spanish-speaking pediatric population. NeuroRehabilitation 2017; 41 (03) 687-694
  • 98 Muñoz-Sandoval A, Cummins J, Alvarado C, Ruef M. Bilingual Verbal Ability Tests. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside; 1998
  • 99 Haman E, Łuniewska M, Pomiechowska B. Designing Cross-Linguistic Lexical Tasks (CLTs) for bilingual preschool children. In: Assessing Multilingual Children: Disentangling Bilingualism from Language Impairment. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters; 2015