Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2019; 80(04): 277-284
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1685195
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Do Complication Rates of Ventricular Drain Placement Differ between Twist Drill and Burr Hole in Acute Hydrocephalus?

Christine Brand
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Andrej Pala
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Wilhelm Kielhorn
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Christian Rainer Wirtz
2   Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinik Ulm, Günzburg, Bayern, Germany
,
Thomas Kapapa
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

23 July 2018

17 October 2018

Publication Date:
24 April 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to compare two techniques for external ventricular drainage (EVD) placement with respect to their complication rates.

Methods A retrospective descriptive study was performed to analyze all patients who had undergone EVD implantation for acute hydrocephalus between January 2010 and December 2013 with a focus on surgical technique and rate of complications. The burr hole technique (BHT) was used in one group and the twist-drill technique (TDT) in the other. Particular attention was paid to malposition, hemorrhage, and catheter-associated infection.

Results A total of 350 consecutive patients underwent EVD implantation for acute hydrocephalus: BHT was performed in 201 and TDT in 147 of the patients, whereas in two patients the technique used was unknown. The overall infection rate was 6.3% (n = 22). Fourteen patients (4%) in the BHT group developed an infection compared with eight patients (9.5%) in the TDT group (p = 0.154). In 16 (4.5%) of all cases, postoperative computed tomography revealed catheter-induced hemorrhage.

In one case (0.3%), surgery was necessary due to acute subdural hematoma. The difference between both techniques was not statistically significant (p = 0.343). In 44 (12.6%) of all cases, the position of the EVD tip was contralateral; in 36 (10.3%) of all cases, the EVD tip was in the brain parenchyma. The rate of malposition was 11.6% (n = 17) in the TDT group and 9.5% (n = 19) in the BHT group (p = 0.078).

Conclusion Neither technique showed significantly different numbers in terms of infection, malposition, and hemorrhagic complications. EVD implantation using the TDT is an adequate method compared with BHT. The advantages of TDT are clear: the duration of surgery is shorter, the size of the wound is smaller, and the surgeon is not confined to the operating room.

Keywords

twist drill - burr hole - external ventricular drain infection - hydrocephalus - ventricular drain placement
 

  • References

  • 1 Khanna RK, Rosenblum ML, Rock JP, Malik GM. Prolonged external ventricular drainage with percutaneous long-tunnel ventriculostomies. J Neurosurg 1995; 83 (05) 791-794
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Leung GKK, Ng KB, Taw BBT, Fan YW. Extended subcutaneous tunnelling technique for external ventricular drainage. Br J Neurosurg 2007; 21 (04) 359-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lo CH, Spelman D, Bailey M, Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Brecknell JE. External ventricular drain infections are independent of drain duration: an argument against elective revision. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 (03) 378-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Holloway KL, Barnes T, Choi S. , et al. Ventriculostomy infections: the effect of monitoring duration and catheter exchange in 584 patients. J Neurosurg 1996; 85 (03) 419-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Keong NCH, Bulters DO, Richards HK. , et al. The SILVER (Silver Impregnated Line Versus EVD Randomized trial): a double-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of an intervention to reduce the rate of external ventricular drain infection. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (02) 394-403 ; discussion 403–404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Alleyne Jr CH, Hassan M, Zabramski JM. The efficacy and cost of prophylactic and perioprocedural antibiotics in patients with external ventricular drains. Neurosurgery 2000; 47 (05) 1124-1127 ; discussion 1127–1129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zabramski JM, Whiting D, Darouiche RO. , et al. Efficacy of antimicrobial-impregnated external ventricular drain catheters: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Neurosurg 2003; 98 (04) 725-730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Friedman WA, Vries JK. Percutaneous tunnel ventriculostomy. Summary of 100 procedures. J Neurosurg 1980; 53 (05) 662-665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wong GKC, Poon WS, Wai S, Yu LM, Lyon D, Lam JMK. Failure of regular external ventricular drain exchange to reduce cerebrospinal fluid infection: result of a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73 (06) 759-761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wiesmann M, Mayer TE. Intracranial bleeding rates associated with two methods of external ventricular drainage. J Clin Neurosci 2001; 8 (02) 126-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lajcak M, Heidecke V, Haude KH, Rainov NG. Infection rates of external ventricular drains are reduced by the use of silver-impregnated catheters. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155 (05) 875-881
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Flint AC, Rao VA, Renda NC, Faigeles BS, Lasman TE, Sheridan W. A simple protocol to prevent external ventricular drain infections. Neurosurgery 2013; 72 (06) 993-999 ; discussion 999
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Foreman PM, Hendrix P, Griessenauer CJ, Schmalz PGR, Harrigan MR. External ventricular drain placement in the intensive care unit versus operating room: evaluation of complications and accuracy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015; 128: 94-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Azeem SS, Origitano TC. Ventricular catheter placement with a frameless neuronavigational system: a 1-year experience. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 (04) (Suppl. 02) 243-247 ; discussion 247–248
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Thomale UW, Knitter T, Schaumann A. , et al. Smartphone-assisted guide for the placement of ventricular catheters. Childs Nerv Syst 2013; 29 (01) 131-139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Arabi Y, Memish ZA, Balkhy HH. , et al. Ventriculostomy-associated infections: incidence and risk factors. Am J Infect Control 2005; 33 (03) 137-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Babu R, Komisarow JM, Agarwal VJ. , et al. Glioblastoma in the elderly: the effect of aggressive and modern therapies on survival. J Neurosurg 2016; 124 (04) 998-1007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Korinek A-M, Reina M, Boch AL, Rivera AO, De Bels D, Puybasset L. Prevention of external ventricular drain–related ventriculitis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005; 147 (01) 39-45 ; discussion 45–46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lozier AP, Sciacca RR, Romagnoli MF, Connolly Jr ES. Ventriculostomy-related infections: a critical review of the literature. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (01) 170-181 ; discussion 181–182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Pfisterer W, Mühlbauer M, Czech T, Reinprecht A. Early diagnosis of external ventricular drainage infection: results of a prospective study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74 (07) 929-932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Walti LN, Conen A, Coward J, Jost GF, Trampuz A. Characteristics of infections associated with external ventricular drains of cerebrospinal fluid. J Infect 2013; 66 (05) 424-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Roitberg BZ, Khan N, Alp MS, Hersonskey T, Charbel FT, Ausman JI. Bedside external ventricular drain placement for the treatment of acute hydrocephalus. Br J Neurosurg 2001; 15 (04) 324-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Mayhall CG, Archer NH, Lamb VA. , et al. Ventriculostomy-related infections. A prospective epidemiologic study. N Engl J Med 1984; 310 (09) 553-559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sundbärg G, Nordström CH, Söderström S. Complications due to prolonged ventricular fluid pressure recording. Br J Neurosurg 1988; 2 (04) 485-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bauer DF, Razdan SN, Bartolucci AA, Markert JM. Meta-analysis of hemorrhagic complications from ventriculostomy placement by neurosurgeons. Neurosurgery 2011; 69 (02) 255-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Phillips SB, Delly F, Nelson C, Krishnamurthy S. Bedside external ventricular drain placement: can multiple passes be predicted on the computed tomography scan before the procedure?. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (05) 739-744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Scholz C, Hubbe U, Deininger M, Deininger MH. Hemorrhage rates of external ventricular drain (EVD), intracranial pressure gauge (ICP) or combined EVD and ICP gauge placement within 48 h of endovascular coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115 (08) 1399-1402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Maniker AH, Vaynman AY, Karimi RJ, Sabit AO, Holland B. Hemorrhagic complications of external ventricular drainage. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (04) (Suppl. 02) ONS419-ONS424 ; discussion ONS424–ONS425
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Saladino A, White JB, Wijdicks EFM, Lanzino G. Malplacement of ventricular catheters by neurosurgeons: a single institution experience. Neurocrit Care 2009; 10 (02) 248-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mahan M, Spetzler RF, Nakaji P. Electromagnetic stereotactic navigation for external ventricular drain placement in the intensive care unit. J Clin Neurosci 2013; 20 (12) 1718-1722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar