Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35(06): 395-410
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1677455
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Impact of Age on Perioperative Complications after Extremity Reconstruction with the Free Gracilis Flap: A Retrospective Cohort Study Involving 153 Patients

Laurenz Weitgasser
1   Department of Hand, Breast, and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
,
Amro Amr
1   Department of Hand, Breast, and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
,
Michaela Hladik
2   Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Hospital Barmherzige Brueder Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
,
Gottfried Wechselberger
2   Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Hospital Barmherzige Brueder Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
,
Adrien Daigeler
3   Department of Hand, Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, BG Trauma Center, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
,
Thomas Schoeller
1   Department of Hand, Breast, and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
,
Fabian Medved
3   Department of Hand, Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, BG Trauma Center, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 May 2018

11 November 2018

Publication Date:
09 January 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The need for plastic and reconstructive surgery on elderly patients has been on the rise due to an increase in life expectancy in the past decades. Therefore, a study was conducted on young and elderly patients following microsurgical extremity reconstructions with free gracilis muscle flaps with the primary aim to investigate the influence of age and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score on the general outcome, as well as surgical and medical complications.

Methods A retrospective analysis of 153 patients receiving free gracilis muscle flaps for extremity reconstructions between November 2009 and January 2018 was performed at two partner institutions specialized in microsurgical reconstructions. A logistic regression analysis was performed to correlate age and the ASA score with postoperative complication probability. Patients younger than 70 years were directly compared with elderly patients with respect to age, gender, ASA score, preexisting comorbidities, localization, and postoperative medical and surgical complications.

Results Age turned out to be not significantly associated with major flap complications (p = 0.925) but with higher ASA scores (p = 0.016). However, an age-related significant increase in minor flap complications could be observed in the elderly (p = 0.008). A significant correlation between minor medical complications and age could be observed (p = 0.001) in contrast to ASA score (p = 0.912).

Conclusion An increased minor flap, as well as minor and major medical complications, must be expected in extremity reconstructions with free gracilis flaps in elderly patients. Higher ASA scores correlate with a higher incidence of major flap complications. Septuagenarians are more prone to develop perioperative major medical complications than patients younger than 70 years. Age and general medical condition, coupled with the performance of each patient, should be thoroughly assessed individually to facilitate a tailored reconstructive approach using risk assessment tools and established scoring systems.

Keywords

elderly - microsurgery - gracilis flap
 

  • References

  • 1 Arai H, Ouchi Y, Yokode M. , et al; Members of Subcommittee for Aging. Toward the realization of a better aged society: messages from gerontology and geriatrics. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2012; 12 (01) 16-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Greenhalgh DG. Management of the skin and soft tissue in the geriatric surgical patient. Surg Clin North Am 2015; 95 (01) 103-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Forouhi NG, Wareham NJ. Epidemiology of diabetes. Medicine (Abingdon) 2014; 42 (12) 698-702
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pataky Z, Vischer U. Diabetic foot disease in the elderly. Diabetes Metab 2007; 33 (Suppl. 01) S56-S65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Shammas NW. Epidemiology, classification, and modifiable risk factors of peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2007; 3 (02) 229-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gillespie L, Gillespie W, Robertson W. , et al. Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people. ACP J Club 2002; 137 (01) 9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wong AK, Joanna Nguyen T, Peric M. , et al. Analysis of risk factors associated with microvascular free flap failure using a multi-institutional database. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (01) 6-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Suominen S, Asko-Seljavaara S. Free flap failures. Microsurgery 1995; 16 (06) 396-399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Howard MA, Cordeiro PG, Disa J. , et al. Free tissue transfer in the elderly: incidence of perioperative complications following microsurgical reconstruction of 197 septuagenarians and octogenarians. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (06) 1659-1668 , discussion 1669–1671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Coskunfirat OK, Chen HC, Spanio S, Tang YB. The safety of microvascular free tissue transfer in the elderly population. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (03) 771-775
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Moucharafieh RS, Saghieh S, Macari G, Atiyeh B. Diabetic foot salvage with microsurgical free-tissue transfer. Microsurgery 2003; 23 (03) 257-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ozkan O, Coşkunfirat OK, Ozgentaş HE. Reliability of free-flap coverage in diabetic foot ulcers. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (02) 107-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kesting MR, Hölzle F, Wolff KD. , et al. Use of microvascular flap technique in older adults with head and neck cancer: a persisting dilemma in reconstructive surgery?. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59 (03) 398-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Malata CM, Cooter RD, Batchelor AG, Simpson KH, Browning FS, Kay SP. Microvascular free-tissue transfers in elderly patients: the leeds experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (07) 1234-1241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chick LR, Walton RL, Reus W, Colen L, Sasmor M. Free flaps in the elderly. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (01) 87-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Miller TJ, Jeong HS, Davis K. , et al. Evaluation of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification system in risk assessment for plastic and reconstructive surgery patients. Aesthet Surg J 2014; 34 (03) 448-456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kish TD, Chang MH, Fung HB. Treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in the elderly: a review. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2010; 8 (06) 485-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ong YS, Levin LS. Lower limb salvage in trauma. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (02) 582-588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Djokovic JL, Hedley-Whyte J. Prediction of outcome of surgery and anesthesia in patients over 80. JAMA 1979; 242 (21) 2301-2306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Harii K, Ohmori K, Torii S. Free gracilis muscle transplantation, with microneurovascular anastomoses for the treatment of facial paralysis. A preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 57 (02) 133-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Deutinger M, Kuzbari R, Paternostro-Sluga T. , et al. Donor-site morbidity of the gracilis flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95 (07) 1240-1244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pülzl P, Schoeller T, Kleewein K, Wechselberger G. Donor-site morbidity of the transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap in autologous breast reconstruction: short-term and long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (04) 233e-242e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Franco MJ, Nicoson MC, Parikh RP, Tung TH. Lower extremity reconstruction with free gracilis flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (03) 218-224
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Huemer GM, Dunst KM, Maurer H, Ninkovic M. Area enlargement of the gracilis muscle flap through microscopically aided intramuscular dissection: ideas and innovations. Microsurgery 2004; 24 (05) 369-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Serletti JM, Higgins JP, Moran S, Orlando GS. Factors affecting outcome in free-tissue transfer in the elderly. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (01) 66-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bhama PK, Patel SA, Khan U, Bhrany AD, Futran ND. Head and neck free flap reconstruction in patients older than 80 years. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (08) 523-530
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Spyropoulou GA, Jeng SF, Hsieh CH, Tsimponis A, Shih HS. Microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancer in elderly patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (02) 91-96
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Patel VM, Stern C, Miglani A. , et al. Evaluation of the relationship between age and outcome after microvascular reconstruction among patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (05) 336-342
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Laporta R, Sorotos M, Longo B, Santanelli di Pompeo F. Breast reconstruction in elderly patients: risk factors, clinical outcomes, and aesthetic results. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (04) 257-267
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Klein HJ, Fuchs N, Mehra T. , et al. Extending the limits of reconstructive microsurgery in elderly patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2016; 69 (08) 1017-1723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Vaid S, Bell T, Grim R, Ahuja V. Predicting risk of death in general surgery patients on the basis of preoperative variables using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Perm J 2012; 16 (04) 10-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar