Download PDF
Semin Hear 2019; 40(01): 049-067
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676783
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Development and Formative Assessment of the Hearing Loss Toolkit for Self-Management

Michelle L. Arnold
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee, Sarasota, Florida
2   School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
,
Preyanca Oree
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee, Sarasota, Florida
,
Victoria Sanchez
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee, Sarasota, Florida
,
Nicholas Reed
3   Department of Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
4   Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Theresa Chisolm
1   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee, Sarasota, Florida
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 February 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Hearing aids are a demonstrated efficacious intervention for age-related hearing loss, and research suggests that good hearing loss self-management skills improve amplification satisfaction and outcomes. One way to foster self-management skills is through the provision of patient education materials. However, many of the available resources related to the management of hearing loss do not account for health literacy and are not suitable for use with adults from varying health literacy backgrounds. To address this issue, we developed the Hearing Loss Toolkit for Self-Management as part of a manualized, best practices hearing intervention used in large clinical trial. We incorporated health literacy recommendations from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in a series of modules that address a variety of common problem areas reported by adults with hearing loss. A formative assessment consisting of feedback questionnaires, semistructured interviews, and a focus group session with representatives from the target audience was conducted. Findings from the development assessment process demonstrate that the Hearing Loss Toolkit for Self-Management is suitable for use with adults with age-related hearing loss who have varying health literacy backgrounds and abilities.

Keywords

patient education - age-related hearing loss - health literacy - hearing aids
 

  • References

  • 1 Bainbridge KE, Ramachandran V. Hearing aid use among older U.S. adults; the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2005-2006 and 2009-2010. Ear Hear 2014; 35 (03) 289-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lin FR, Thorpe R, Gordon-Salant S, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss prevalence and risk factors among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2011; 66 (05) 582-590
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Popelka MM, Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein BE, Klein R. Low prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults with hearing loss: the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46 (09) 1075-1078
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Chia EM, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Cumming RR, Newall P, Mitchell P. Hearing impairment and health-related quality of life: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study. Ear Hear 2007; 28 (02) 187-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VIII: 25-year trends in the hearing health market. Hearing Review 2009; 16: 12-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Laplante-Lévesque A, Hickson L, Worrall L. Rehabilitation of older adults with hearing impairment: a critical review. J Aging Health 2010; 22 (02) 143-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 British Society of Audiology. Common principles of rehabilitation for adults with hearing- and/or balance-related problems in routine audiology services. 2012. Available at: http://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/BSA_PPC_Rehab_Final_30August2012.pdf. Accessed January 4, 2019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Deal JA, Albert MS, Arnold M. , et al. A randomized feasibility pilot trial of hearing treatment for reducing cognitive decline: results from the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders Pilot Study. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2017; 3 (03) 410-415
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hickson L, Worrall L, Scarinci N. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the active communication education program for older people with hearing impairment. Ear Hear 2007; 28 (02) 212-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Laplante-Lévesque A. Individualized Active Communication Education. The University of Queensland, Australia; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1997; 8 (01) 27-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ferguson M, Brandreth M, Brassington W, Leighton P, Wharrad H. A Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the benefits of a multimedia educational program for first-time hearing aid users. Ear Hear 2016; 37 (02) 123-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 van der Heide I, Wang J, Droomers M, Spreeuwenberg P, Rademakers J, Uiters E. The relationship between health, education, and health literacy: results from the Dutch Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey. J Health Commun 2013; 18 (Suppl. 01) 172-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Schillinger D, Barton LR, Karter AJ, Wang F, Adler N. Does literacy mediate the relationship between education and health outcomes? A study of a low-income population with diabetes. Public Health Rep 2006; 121 (03) 245-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kirsch IR, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L. , et al. Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey: US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement; 2002
    PubMed
  • 16 Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155 (02) 97-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig D. , et al. Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 18 The Joint Commission. Advancing Effective Communication, Cultural Competence, and Patient- and Family-Centered Care: A Roadmap for Hospitals. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Davis TC, Mayeaux EJ, Fredrickson D, Bocchini Jr JA, Jackson RH, Murphy PW. Reading ability of parents compared with reading level of pediatric patient education materials. Pediatrics 1994; 93 (03) 460-468
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Davis TC, Crouch MA, Wills G, Miller S, Abdehou DM. The gap between patient reading comprehension and the readability of patient education materials. J Fam Pract 1990; 31 (05) 533-538
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Stossel LM, Segar N, Gliatto P, Fallar R, Karani R. Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27 (09) 1165-1170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Zion AB, Aiman J. Level of reading difficulty in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists patient education pamphlets. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74 (06) 955-960
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Eltorai AE, Sharma P, Wang J, Daniels AH. Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (04) 1181-1186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Singh J. Research briefs reading grade level and readability of printed cancer education materials. Oncol Nurs Forum 2003; 30 (05) 867-870
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hearth-Holmes M, Murphy PW, Davis TC. , et al. Literacy in patients with a chronic disease: systemic lupus erythematosus and the reading level of patient education materials. J Rheumatol 1997; 24 (12) 2335-2339
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Caposecco A, Hickson L, Meyer C. Hearing aid user guides: suitability for older adults. Int J Audiol 2014; 53 (Suppl. 01) S43-S51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Nair EL, Cienkowski KM. The impact of health literacy on patient understanding of counseling and education materials. Int J Audiol 2010; 49 (02) 71-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Laplante-Lévesque A, Brännström KJ, Andersson G, Lunner T. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for adults with hearing impairment and their significant others. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (08) 618-626
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDCs Health Literacy Action Plan. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/planact/cdcplan.html. Accessed January 8, 2018
    PubMed
  • 31 Kincaid JP, Fishburne J, Robert P. , et al. Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel. Defense Technical Information Center; 1975: 51
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Toolkit for Making Written Material Clear and Effective. 2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Everyday words for public health communication. Washington, DC: CDC; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 61 (02) 173-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kripalani S, Robertson R, Love-Ghaffari MH. , et al. Development of an illustrated medication schedule as a low-literacy patient education tool. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 66 (03) 368-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Tae JW, Lee JC, Hong SJ. , et al. Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76 (04) 804-811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Seligman HK, Wallace AS, DeWalt DA. , et al. Facilitating behavior change with low-literacy patient education materials. Am J Health Behav 2007; 31 (Suppl. 01) S69-S78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Convery E, Keidser G, Caposecco A, Swanepoel W, Wong LL, Shen E. Hearing-aid assembly management among adults from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds: toward the feasibility of self-fitting hearing aids. Int J Audiol 2013; 52 (06) 385-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Joseph J, Svider PF, Shaigany K. , et al. Hearing aid patient education materials: is there room for improvement?. J Am Acad Audiol 2016; 27 (04) 354-359
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Henry JA, Stewart BJ, Griest S, Kaelin C, Zaugg TL, Carlson K. Multisite randomized controlled trial to compare two methods of tinnitus intervention to two control conditions. Ear Hear 2016; 37 (06) e346-e359
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns 2014; 96 (03) 395-403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Knudsen LV, Laplante-Lévesque A, Jones L. , et al. Conducting qualitative research in audiology: a tutorial. Int J Audiol 2012; 51 (02) 83-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Fischer ME, Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Klein BE, Klein R, Tweed TS. Determinants of hearing aid acquisition in older adults. Am J Public Health 2011; 101 (08) 1449-1455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Garstecki DC, Erler SF. Hearing loss, control, and demographic factors influencing hearing aid use among older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41 (03) 527-537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Nieman CL, Marrone N, Szanton SL, Thorpe Jr RJ, Lin FR. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in hearing health care among older Americans. J Aging Health 2016; 28 (01) 68-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS, Nurss J. The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. Am J Public Health 1997; 87 (06) 1027-1030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Boi R, Racca L, Cavallero A. , et al. Hearing loss and depressive symptoms in elderly patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2012; 12 (03) 440-445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Lin FR, Metter EJ, O'Brien RJ, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss and incident dementia. Arch Neurol 2011; 68 (02) 214-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Genther DJ, Frick KD, Chen D, Betz J, Lin FR. Association of hearing loss with hospitalization and burden of disease in older adults. JAMA 2013; 309 (22) 2322-2324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Lin FR, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss and falls among older adults in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172 (04) 369-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Convery E, Keidser G, Dillon H, Hartley L. A self-fitting hearing aid: need and concept. Trends Amplif 2011; 15 (04) 157-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Humes LE, Rogers SE, Quigley TM, Main AK, Kinney DL, Herring C. The effects of service-delivery model and purchase price on hearing-aid outcomes in older adults: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Am J Audiol 2017; 26 (01) 53-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Keidser G, Dillon H, Flax M, Ching T, Brewer S. The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Audiology Res 2011; 1 (01) e24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Coco L, Champlin CA, Eikelboom RH. Community-based intervention determines tele-audiology site candidacy. Am J Audiol 2016; 25 (3S): 264-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Ferguson M, Henshaw H. Computer and internet interventions to optimize listening and learning for people with hearing loss: accessibility, use and adherence. Am J Audiol 2015; 24 (03) 338-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. America's Health Literacy: Why We Need Accessible Health Information. An Issue Brief from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2008
    PubMedGoogle Scholar