J Knee Surg 2019; 32(08): 825-832
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669790
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Suture Anchor versus Transosseous Tunnel Patellar Tendon Repair Techniques

Seth L. Sherman
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
,
Brandee Black
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
,
Matthew A. Mooberry
3   Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Katie L. Freeman
4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska
,
Trevor R. Gulbrandsen
5   Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Jeffrey L. Milles
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
,
Laura Evans
6   Department of Quality Engineer, Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee
,
David Flood
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
,
Ferris Pfeiffer
7   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery/Bioengineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

07 September 2018

23 July 2018

Publication Date:
06 September 2018 (online)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the cyclic loading strength and ultimate failure load in suture anchor repair versus transosseous tunnel repair of patellar tendons using a cadaver model. Twelve cadaveric patella specimens were used (six matched pairs). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements were performed to ensure equal bone quality among groups. All right knees were assigned to the suture anchor repair group (n = 6), whereas all left knees were assigned to the transosseous bone tunnel group (n = 6). Suture type and repair configuration were equivalent. After the respective procedures were performed, each patella was mounted into a gripping jig. Tensile load was applied at a rate of 1 Hz between magnitudes of 50 and 150 N, 50 and 200 N, 50 and 250 N, and tensile load at a rate of 0.1 mm/s until failure. Failure was defined as a sharp deviation in the linear load versus displacement curve, and failure mode was recorded. DXA measurements demonstrated equivalence of bone quality between the two groups (p > 0.05). During cyclic load testing, there was only a statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to cyclic loading at the 50 to 200 N loading cycle (p = 0.010). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to ultimate load to failure (p = 0.43). Failure mode within the suture anchor cohort occurred through anchor pullout except for one, which failed through the tendon. All specimens within the transosseous cohort failed through the midsubstance of the tendon except for one, which failed through suture breakage. Suture anchor repair demonstrated a similar biomechanical profile regarding cyclic loading and ultimate load to failure when compared with “gold standard” transosseous tunnel patellar tendon repair with a trend toward less gapping in the suture anchor group. Using suture anchors for repair of the patella tendon has similar biomechanical properties to transpatellar tunnels but may provide other clinical advantages.

Note

Arthrex, Inc. (Naples, FL) supplied suture anchors and cadaver specimens for this study. This study has been podium presented at the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons in March 2017 and at the Mid-America Orthopaedic Association in April 2017.


 
  • References

  • 1 Greis PE, Holmstrom MC, Lahav A. Surgical treatment options for patella tendon rupture, Part I: acute. Orthopedics 2005; 28 (07) 672-679
  • 2 Enad JG. Patellar tendon ruptures. South Med J 1999; 92 (06) 563-566
  • 3 Matava MJ. Patellar tendon ruptures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1996; 4 (06) 287-296
  • 4 Maffulli N, Wong J. Rupture of the Achilles and patellar tendons. Clin Sports Med 2003; 22 (04) 761-776
  • 5 Pires e Albuquerque RS, de Araújo GC, Labronici PJ, Gameiro VS. Patellar ligament rupture in an adolescent. BMJ Case Rep 2015; 2015: bcr2014208070
  • 6 Takata Y, Nakase J, Numata H, Oshima T, Tsuchiya H. Repair and augmentation of a spontaneous patellar tendon rupture in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015; 135 (05) 639-644
  • 7 Schliemann B, Grüneweller N, Yao D. , et al. Biomechanical evaluation of different surgical techniques for treating patellar tendon ruptures. Int Orthop 2016; 40 (08) 1717-1723
  • 8 Gilmore JH, Clayton-Smith ZJ, Aguilar M, Pneumaticos SG, Giannoudis PV. Reconstruction techniques and clinical results of patellar tendon ruptures: Evidence today. Knee 2015; 22 (03) 148-155
  • 9 Saragaglia D, Pison A, Rubens-Duval B. Acute and old ruptures of the extensor apparatus of the knee in adults (excluding knee replacement). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013; 99 (01) , Suppl): S67-S76
  • 10 Lee D, Stinner D, Mir H. Quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures. J Knee Surg 2013; 26 (05) 301-308
  • 11 Roudet A, Boudissa M, Chaussard C, Rubens-Duval B, Saragaglia D. Acute traumatic patellar tendon rupture: early and late results of surgical treatment of 38 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015; 101 (03) 307-311
  • 12 Bushnell BD, Byram IR, Weinhold PS, Creighton RA. The use of suture anchors in repair of the ruptured patellar tendon: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (09) 1492-1499
  • 13 Bushnell BD, Tennant JN, Rubright JH, Creighton RA. Repair of patellar tendon rupture using suture anchors. J Knee Surg 2008; 21 (02) 122-129
  • 14 Capiola D, Re L. Repair of patellar tendon rupture with suture anchors. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (08) 906.e1-906.e4
  • 15 Sherman SL, Copeland ME, Milles JL, Flood DA, Pfeiffer FM. Biomechanical evaluation of suture anchor versus transosseous tunnel quadriceps tendon repair techniques. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (06) 1117-1124
  • 16 Petri M, Dratzidis A, Brand S. , et al. Suture anchor repair yields better biomechanical properties than transosseous sutures in ruptured quadriceps tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (04) 1039-1045
  • 17 Lighthart WA, Cohen DA, Levine RG, Parks BG, Boucher HR. Suture anchor versus suture through tunnel fixation for quadriceps tendon rupture: a biomechanical study. Orthopedics 2008; 31 (05) 441
  • 18 Hart ND, Wallace MK, Scovell JF, Krupp RJ, Cook C, Wyland DJ. Quadriceps tendon rupture: a biomechanical comparison of transosseous equivalent double-row suture anchor versus transosseous tunnel repair. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (04) 335-339
  • 19 Mille F, Adam A, Aubry S. , et al. Prospective multicentre study of the clinical and functional outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair with suture anchors. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2016; 26 (01) 85-92
  • 20 Gaines RJ, Grabill SE, DeMaio M, Carr D. Patellar tendon repair with suture anchors using a combined suture technique of a Krackow-Bunnell weave. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23 (01) 68-71
  • 21 Grant JA, Bissell B, Hake ME, Miller BS, Hughes RE, Carpenter JE. Relationship between implant use, operative time, and costs associated with distal biceps tendon reattachment. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (11) e1618-e1624
  • 22 Diduch DR, Scanelli J, Tompkins M, Milewski MD, Carson E, Ma SY. Tissue anchor use in arthroscopic glenohumeral surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012; 20 (07) 459-471
  • 23 Kim TW, Kamath AF, Israelite CL. Suture anchor repair of quadriceps tendon rupture after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (05) 817-820
  • 24 Lee TQ, Matsuura PA, Fogolin RP, Lin AC, Kim D, McMahon PJ. Arthroscopic suture tying: a comparison of knot types and suture materials. Arthroscopy 2001; 17 (04) 348-352
  • 25 Krackow KA, Thomas SC, Jones LC. A new stitch for ligament-tendon fixation. Brief note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68 (05) 764-766
  • 26 Ettinger M, Dratzidis A, Hurschler C. , et al. Biomechanical properties of suture anchor repair compared with transosseous sutures in patellar tendon ruptures: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (11) 2540-2544
  • 27 Idler CS, Montgomery III WH, Lindsey DP, Badua PA, Wynne GF, Yerby SA. Distal biceps tendon repair: a biomechanical comparison of intact tendon and 2 repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (06) 968-974
  • 28 Salata MJ, Sherman SL, Lin EC. , et al. Biomechanical evaluation of transosseous rotator cuff repair: do anchors really matter?. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (02) 283-290
  • 29 Ravalin RV, Mazzocca AD, Grady-Benson JC, Nissen CW, Adams DJ. Biomechanical comparison of patellar tendon repairs in a cadaver model: an evaluation of gap formation at the repair site with cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (04) 469-473
  • 30 West JL, Keene JS, Kaplan LD. Early motion after quadriceps and patellar tendon repairs: outcomes with single-suture augmentation. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (02) 316-323
  • 31 Richards DP, Barber FA. Repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures using suture anchors. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (05) 556-559