Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79(S 04): S311-S315
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667123
WFSBS 2016
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Surgical Treatment of Cavernous Sinus Lesion in Patients with Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas via the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach

Masahiro Toda
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kenzo Kosugi
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
,
Hiroyuki Ozawa
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kaoru Ogawa
2   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kazunari Yoshida
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

26 February 2018

10 June 2018

Publication Date:
16 July 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The main purpose of this article is to assess the effectiveness and safety of surgery via the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for cavernous sinus (CS) lesion in patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA).

Design Retrospective study.

Setting Keio University Hospital.

Participants Thirty patients who underwent CS surgery via the EEA between 2009 and 2017 for Knosp grade 4 NFPA with pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging available for volumetric analysis.

Main Outcome Measures Clinical presentation, extent of resection, and surgical complications.

Results Gross total and near total resection of CS tumors was achieved in 12/30 (40%) cases of Knosp grade 4 NFPA. The average resection rate of CS lesions in these 30 patients was 73.5%; 77.3% in primary cases and 70.1% in recurrent cases that did not vary significantly. Preoperative visual disturbance and oculomotor nerve palsy improved in 12/19 (63.1%) and ⅗ (60%) cases, respectively. Complications associated with CS via the EEA were postoperative cerebrospinal leakage (1/30, 3.3%), meningitis (1/30, 3.3%), and transient cranial nerve palsy (2/30, 6.7%). These complications except a case of mild transient abducens nerve palsy occurred in recurrent cases with subdural lesions.

Conclusions Although the optimal management of CS lesions in NFPA is controversial, debulking via the EEA is an effective and safe option that improves neurological symptoms and enables effective adjuvant radiotherapy. Recurrent cases with subdural invasion are technically challenging, even using the EEA, and special care is required to avoid complications.

Keywords

skull base - complications - pituitary adenoma
 

  • References

  • 1 Parkinson D. A surgical approach to the cavernous portion of the carotid artery. Anatomical studies and case report. J Neurosurg 1965; 23 (05) 474-483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hakuba A, Tanaka K, Suzuki T, Nishimura S. A combined orbitozygomatic infratemporal epidural and subdural approach for lesions involving the entire cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 1989; 71 (5 Pt 1): 699-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Harris FS, Rhoton AL. Anatomy of the cavernous sinus. A microsurgical study. J Neurosurg 1976; 45 (02) 169-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Inoue T, Rhoton Jr AL, Theele D, Barry ME. Surgical approaches to the cavernous sinus: a microsurgical study. Neurosurgery 1990; 26 (06) 903-932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Perneczky A, Knosp E, Matula C. Cavernous sinus surgery. Approach through the lateral wall. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1988; 92 (1-4): 76-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Leksell L. Stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46 (09) 797-803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Ishiguro T. Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2003; 52 (03) 517-524 , discussion 523–524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kim M, Paeng S, Pyo S, Jeong Y, Lee S, Jung Y. Gamma knife surgery for invasive pituitary macroadenoma. J Neurosurg 2006; 105 (Suppl): 26-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kuo JS, Chen JC, Yu C. , et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for benign cavernous sinus tumors: quantitative analysis of treatment outcomes. Neurosurgery 2004; 54 (06) 1385-1393 , discussion 1393–1394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Roche PH, Régis J, Dufour H. , et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2000; 93 (Suppl. 03) 68-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chang SD, Adler Jr JR, Martin DP. LINAC radiosurgery for cavernous sinus meningiomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1998; 71 (01) 43-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lee JY, Niranjan A, McInerney J, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Stereotactic radiosurgery providing long-term tumor control of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (01) 65-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nicolato A, Foroni R, Alessandrini F, Bricolo A, Gerosa M. Radiosurgical treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas: experience with 122 treated patients. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (05) 1153-1159 , discussion 1159–1161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fraioli B, Esposito V, Santoro A, Iannetti G, Giuffrè R, Cantore G. Transmaxillosphenoidal approach to tumors invading the medial compartment of the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 1995; 82 (01) 63-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hashimoto N, Kikuchi H. Transsphenoidal approach to infrasellar tumors involving the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 1990; 73 (04) 513-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kikuchi R, Toda M, Tomita T, Ogawa K, Yoshida K. Surgical outcome of endoscopic endonasal surgery for non-functional pituitary adenoma by a team of neurosurgeons and otolaryngologists adenoma by a team of neurosurgeons and otolaryngologists. Turk Neurosurg 2017; 27 (01) 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ceylan S, Koc K, Anik I. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 2010; 112 (01) 99-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dhandapani S, Singh H, Negm HM, Cohen S, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Cavernous sinus invasion in pituitary adenomas: systematic review and pooled data meta-analysis of radiologic criteria and comparison of endoscopic and microscopic surgery. World Neurosurg 2016; 96: 36-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ferreli F, Turri-Zanoni M, Canevari FR. , et al. Endoscopic endonasal management of non-functioning pituitary adenomas with cavernous sinus invasion: a 10-year experience. Rhinology 2015; 53 (04) 308-316
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Micko AS, Wöhrer A, Wolfsberger S, Knosp E. Invasion of the cavernous sinus space in pituitary adenomas: endoscopic verification and its correlation with an MRI-based classification. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (04) 803-811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Taniguchi M, Hosoda K, Akutsu N, Takahashi Y, Kohmura E. Endoscopic endonasal transsellar approach for laterally extended pituitary adenomas: volumetric analysis of cavernous sinus invasion. Pituitary 2015; 18 (04) 518-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Vellutini EdeA, Beer-Furlan A, Stamm AC. Endoscopic transsellar approach to pituitary adenomas with cavernous sinus invasion: is this just a matter of lateral extension?. Pituitary 2016; 19 (03) 342-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Woodworth GF, Patel KS, Shin B. , et al. Surgical outcomes using a medial-to-lateral endonasal endoscopic approach to pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 2014; 120 (05) 1086-1094
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C. Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 1993; 33 (04) 610-617 , discussion 617–618
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ozawa H, Tomita T, Watanabe Y. , et al. Sigmoid incision rescue nasoseptal flap technique for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 2016; 136 (06) 636-640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL. , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Jho HD, Ha HG. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: Part 2--The cavernous sinus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004; 47 (01) 9-15
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bao X, Deng K, Liu X. , et al. Extended transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas invading the cavernous sinus using multiple complementary techniques. Pituitary 2016; 19 (01) 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dallapiazza RF, Grober Y, Starke RM, Laws Jr ER, Jane Jr JA. Long-term results of endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas. Neurosurgery 2015; 76 (01) 42-52 , discussion 52–53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 de Paiva Neto MA, Vandergrift A, Fatemi N. , et al. Endonasal transsphenoidal surgery and multimodality treatment for giant pituitary adenomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2010; 72 (04) 512-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hofstetter CP, Nanaszko MJ, Mubita LL, Tsiouris J, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Volumetric classification of pituitary macroadenomas predicts outcome and morbidity following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary 2012; 15 (03) 450-463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Karppinen A, Kivipelto L, Vehkavaara S. , et al. Transition from microscopic to endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctional pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (01) 48-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Paluzzi A, Wang EW, Snyderman CH. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for giant pituitary adenomas: advantages and limitations. J Neurosurg 2013; 118 (03) 621-631
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Messerer M, De Battista JC, Raverot G. , et al. Evidence of improved surgical outcome following endoscopy for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma removal. Neurosurg Focus 2011; 30 (04) E11
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Nishioka H, Fukuhara N, Horiguchi K, Yamada S. Aggressive transsphenoidal resection of tumors invading the cavernous sinus in patients with acromegaly: predictive factors, strategies, and outcomes. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (03) 505-510
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Paluzzi A, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Tonya Stefko S, Challinor S, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA. Endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: a series of 555 patients. Pituitary 2014; 17 (04) 307-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Stofko DL, Nickles T, Sun H, Dehdashti AR. The value of immediate postoperative MR imaging following endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156 (01) 133-140 , discussion 140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Torales J, Halperin I, Hanzu F. , et al. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary tumors. Results in a series of 121 patients operated at the same center and by the same neurosurgeon. Endocrinol Nutr 2014; 61 (08) 410-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yamada S, Fukuhara N, Horiguchi K. , et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and therapeutic outcomes in thyrotropin-secreting pituitary adenomas: a single-center study of 90 cases. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (06) 1462-1473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Frank G, Pasquini E. Endoscopic endonasal cavernous sinus surgery, with special reference to pituitary adenomas. Front Horm Res 2006; 34: 64-82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Fernandez-Miranda JC, Zwagerman NT, Abhinav K. , et al. Cavernous sinus compartments from the endoscopic endonasal approach: anatomical considerations and surgical relevance to adenoma surgery. J Neurosurg 2017; DOI: 10.3171/2017.2.JNS162214.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar