Eur J Pediatr Surg 2019; 29(03): 298-301
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667111
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Thromboelastometry as an Alternative Method for Coagulation Assessment in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Invasive Procedures: A Pilot Study

Miroslav Durila
1   Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
,
Jakub Jonas
1   Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
,
Marianna Durilova
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
,
Michal Rygl
2   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
,
Jiri Skrivan
3   Department of Pediatric ENT, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
,
Tomas Vymazal
1   Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 March 2018

07 June 2018

Publication Date:
01 August 2018 (online)

Abstracts

Introduction Standard coagulation tests (activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] and prothrombin time [PT]) are used for the assessment of coagulation profile in critically ill pediatric patients undergoing invasive interventions such as insertion of central venous catheter, tonsillectomy, laparotomy, etc. However, these tests do not reflect the profile of whole blood coagulation. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) as a point of care (POC) viscoelastic test may serve as an alternative method. Due to its ability to assess coagulation profile of the whole blood, it might yield normal results despite prolonged aPTT/PT results. The aim of this study was to find out if there was any severe bleeding during or after invasive procedures if ROTEM test was normal despite prolonged values of aPTT/PT in pediatric patients.

Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed data for the years 2015 to 2017 for pediatric patients with prolonged values of aPTT or PT and normal ROTEM tests—internal thromboelastometry (INTEM) (assessing internal pathway of coagulation) and external thromboelastometry (EXTEM) (assessing external pathway of coagulation)—and we looked for severe bleeding during or after invasive procedures.

Results In 26 pediatric patients (children from 2 months to 17 years old), we found that INTEM and EXTEM tests showed normal coagulation despite prolonged values of aPTT ratio with a median of 1.47 (minimum 1.04 and maximum 2.05), international normalized ratio with a median of 1.4 (minimum 0.99 and maximum 2.10), and PT ratio with a median of 1.30 (minimum 0.89 and maximum 2.11). In these patients, no severe bleeding was observed during interventions or postoperatively.

Conclusion Our data support using thromboelastometry method as an alternative coagulation test for the assessment of coagulation profile in pediatric patients undergoing surgical or other invasive procedures, especially using it as a POC test. All invasive procedures in our study were performed without severe bleeding despite prolonged values of PT/aPTT with normal ROTEM results. It seems that ROTEM assessment of coagulation may lead to decreased administration of fresh frozen plasma and shorten time of patient preparation for intervention.

 
  • References

  • 1 Hoffman M, Monroe III DM. A cell-based model of hemostasis. Thromb Haemost 2001; 85 (06) 958-965
  • 2 Spiezia L, Vasques F, Behr A. , et al. Perioperative coagulation assessment of patients undergoing major elective orthopedic surgery. Intern Emerg Med 2016; 11 (06) 793-801
  • 3 Ellenberger C, Garofano N, Barcelos G, Diaper J, Pavlovic G, Licker M. Assessment of haemostasis in patients undergoing emergent neurosurgery by rotational elastometry and standard coagulation tests: a prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2017; 17 (01) 146
  • 4 Gozdzik W, Adamik B, Wysoczanski G. , et al. Preoperative thromboelastometry for the prediction of increased chest tube output in cardiac surgery: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96 (30) e7669
  • 5 Anıl H, Kılıç Yıldırım G, Harmancı K. , et al. Thromboelastogram as a tool to predict hypercoagulability in children with cystic fibrosis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2018; 24 (02) 348-352
  • 6 Russell RT, Maizlin II, Vogel AM. Viscoelastic monitoring in pediatric trauma: a survey of pediatric trauma society members. J Surg Res 2017; 214: 216-220
  • 7 Sangkhathat S, Suwannarat D, Boonpipattanapong T, Sangthong B. Rotational thromboelastometry in the diagnosis of coagulopathy in major pediatric surgical operations. J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50 (11) 2001-2004
  • 8 Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V. , et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition. Crit Care 2016; 20: 100
  • 9 Kozek-Langenecker SA, Afshari A, Albaladejo P. , et al. Management of severe perioperative bleeding: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30 (06) 270-382
  • 10 Mohammed M, Fayed N, Hassanen A. , et al. Rotational thromboelastometry and standard coagulation tests for live liver donors. Clin Transplant 2013; 27 (02) E101-E108
  • 11 Urwyler N, Theiler L, Hirschberg M, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Colucci G, Greif R. Standard vs. point-of-care measurement of fibrinogen: potential impact on clinical decisions. Minerva Anestesiol 2012; 78 (05) 550-555
  • 12 Keene DD, Nordmann GR, Woolley T. Rotational thromboelastometry-guided trauma resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2013; 19 (06) 605-612
  • 13 Hagemo JS, Christiaans SC, Stanworth SJ. , et al. Detection of acute traumatic coagulopathy and massive transfusion requirements by means of rotational thromboelastometry: an international prospective validation study. Crit Care 2015; 19: 97
  • 14 Smart L, Mumtaz K, Scharpf D. , et al. Rotational thromboelastometry or conventional coagulation tests in liver transplantation: comparing blood loss, transfusions, and cost. Ann Hepatol 2017; 16 (06) 916-923
  • 15 Müller MC, Arbous MS, Spoelstra-de Man AM. , et al. Transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma in critically ill patients with a coagulopathy before invasive procedures: a randomized clinical trial (CME). Transfusion 2015; 55 (01) 26-35
  • 16 De Pietri L, Bianchini M, Montalti R. , et al. Thrombelastography-guided blood product use before invasive procedures in cirrhosis with severe coagulopathy: a randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 2016; 63 (02) 566-573
  • 17 Lukas P, Durila M, Jonas J, Vymazal T. Evaluation of thromboelastometry in sepsis in correlation with bleeding during invasive procedures. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2017; 1076029617731624
  • 18 Haas T, Spielmann N, Mauch J. , et al. Comparison of thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) with standard plasmatic coagulation testing in paediatric surgery. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108 (01) 36-41
  • 19 Nakayama Y, Nakajima Y, Tanaka KA. , et al. Thromboelastometry-guided intraoperative haemostatic management reduces bleeding and red cell transfusion after paediatric cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114 (01) 91-102
  • 20 Leeper CM, Gaines BA. Viscoelastic hemostatic assays in the management of the pediatric trauma patient. Semin Pediatr Surg 2017; 26 (01) 8-13
  • 21 Görlinger K, Saner FH. Prophylactic plasma and platelet transfusion in the critically Ill patient: just useless and expensive or even harmful?. BMC Anesthesiol 2015; 15: 86
  • 22 Li J, Liu Y, Yin W. , et al. Alterations of the preoperative coagulation profile in patients with acute appendicitis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49 (08) 1333-1339