Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2018; 39(03): 257-269
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1660784
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Group Communication Treatment for Individuals with PPA and Their Partners

Aimee Mooney
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon
2   Institute on Development and Disability, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
,
Naomi Beale
1   Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon
,
Melanie Fried-Oken
2   Institute on Development and Disability, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 June 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative syndrome characterized by insidious language deterioration. This young-onset disorder leaves adults with reduced communication skills for participation in social activities. There is limited evidence regarding group treatment for individuals with PPA, though the principles of chronic aphasia groups can be applied to this clinical population. We developed a PPA group treatment model incorporating compensatory strategies from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), communication partner training from aphasia rehabilitation, and systematic instruction from dementia management. Six modules were designed and delivered to people with PPA and their communication partners in a university clinic setting over a 6-week period. Treatment was provided by graduate clinicians with supervision from a certified speech–language pathologist and faculty member. Primary treatment goals were to provide education about PPA symptoms and progression; to increase practice and use of multimodal communication by people with PPA; and to establish an environment where people with PPA and their partners could connect for training and support. We present pre/post comparisons and satisfaction data provided by five individuals with PPA and their partners in the group. Results suggest that group training is an effective service delivery model. Participants reported gains in both knowledge about PPA and in using many different modalities to communicate. The new compensatory strategies learned provide tools for maintenance and improvement of language use. Participants saw increased confidence and participation in daily activities, and highlighted the value of the PPA group for individuals with this relatively rare condition and their family members.

Keywords

Primary progressive aphasia - augmentative and alternative communication - group treatment - multimodal communication - communication partner training

Disclosures

Ms. Mooney receives salary from Oregon Health and Science University and from Portland State University. Dr. Fried-Oken receives salary from Oregon Health and Science University. Ms. Beale has no financial disclosures.


 

  • References

  • 1 Simmons-Mackie N, Elman RJ, Holland AL, Damico JS. Management of discourse in group therapy for aphasia. Top Lang Disord 2007; 27 (01) 5-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nickels L, Croot K. Understanding and Living with Primary Progressive Aphasia: Current Progress and Challenges for the Future. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Mesulam MM. Slowly progressive aphasia without generalized dementia. Ann Neurol 1982; 11 (06) 592-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bonner MF, Ash S, Grossman M. The new classification of primary progressive aphasia into semantic, logopenic, or nonfluent/agrammatic variants. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2010; 10 (06) 484-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S. , et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 2011; 76 (11) 1006-1014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wilson SM, Henry ML, Besbris M. , et al. Connected speech production in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Brain 2010; 133 (Pt 7): 2069-2088
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Spinelli EG, Mandelli ML, Miller ZA. , et al. Typical and atypical pathology in primary progressive aphasia variants. Ann Neurol 2017; 81 (03) 430-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Banks S, Rogalski E, Medina J, Skoglund A, Morhardt D. Organizing a series of education and support conferences for caregivers of individuals with frontotemporal dementia and primary progressive aphasia. Alzheimers Care Q 2006; 7 (04) 243-250
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Morhardt DJ, O'Hara MC, Zachrich K, Wieneke C, Rogalski EJ. Development of a psycho-educational support program for individuals with primary progressive aphasia and their care-partners. Dementia 2017; 00 (00) 1-18 . doi: 1471301217699675
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fried-Oken M, Daniels D, Ettinger O, Mooney A, Noethe G, Rowland C. What's on your mind? Conversation topics chosen by people with degenerative cognitive-linguistic disorders for communication boards. J Speech-Lang Pat 2015; 24 (02) 272-280
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Social Security Administration. Program Operations Manual System (POMS) DI 23022.485 Primary Progressive Aphasia. Available at: http://policy.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0423022485 . Accessed June 6, 2018
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Carthery-Goulart MT, da Silveira ADC, Machado TH. , et al. Nonpharmacological interventions for cognitive impairments following primary progressive aphasia: a systematic review of the literature. Dement Neuropsychol 2013; 7 (01) 122-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Croot K, Nickels L, Laurence F, Manning M. Impairment-and activity/participation-directed interventions in progressive language impairment: clinical and theoretical issues. Aphasiology 2009; 23 (02) 125-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Farrajota L, Maruta C, Maroco J, Martins IP, Guerreiro M, de Mendonça A. Speech therapy in primary progressive aphasia: a pilot study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra 2012; 2 (01) 321-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Beeson PM, Higginson K, Rising K. Writing treatment for aphasia: a texting approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2013; 56 (03) 945-955
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Beukelman DR, Fager S, Ball L, Dietz A. AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: a review. Augment Altern Commun 2007; 23 (03) 230-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bier N, Brambati S, Macoir J. , et al. Relying on procedural memory to enhance independence in daily living activities: Smartphone use in a case of semantic dementia. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2015; 25 (06) 913-935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Fried-Oken M, Mooney A, Peters B. Supporting communication for patients with neurodegenerative disease. NeuroRehabilitation 2015; 37 (01) 69-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Garrett KL, Lasker JP. AAC and severe aphasia—enhancing communication across the continuum of recovery. SIG 2. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord 2007; 17 (03) 6-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Goldberg S, Haley KL, Jacks A. Script training and generalization for people with aphasia. J Speech-Lang Pat 2012; 21 (03) 222-238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ho KM, Weiss SJ, Garrett KL, Lloyd LL. The effect of remnant and pictographic books on the communicative interaction of individuals with global aphasia. Augment Altern Commun 2005; 21 (03) 218-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Khayum B, Wieneke C, Rogalski E, Robinson J, O'Hara M. Thinking outside the stroke: treating primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Perspect Gerontol 2012; 17 (02) 37-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Elman R. Introduction to group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders. Group Treatment of Neurogenic Communication Disorders: The Expert Clinician's Approach 2007:1–10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Williamson D. Maximizing outcomes in group treatment of aphasia: lessons learned from a community-based center. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord 2014; 24 (23) 100-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Elman RJ. The importance of aphasia group treatment for rebuilding community and health. Top Lang Disord 2007; 27 (04) 300-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Jokel R, Meltzer J. , D R J, et al. Group intervention for individuals with primary progressive aphasia and their spouses: who comes first?. J Commun Disord 2017; 66: 51-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 O'Halloran R, Hickson L, Worrall L. Environmental factors that influence communication between people with communication disability and their healthcare providers in hospital: a review of the literature within the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2008; 43 (06) 601-632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Blackstone SW, Hunt-Berg M. Social Networks Inventory: A Communication Inventory for Individuals with Complex Communication Needs and their Communication Partners. Verona, WI: Attainment Company; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Beukelman D, Mirenda P. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs, 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Cress C, King J. AAC strategies for people with primary progressive aphasia without dementia: two case studies. Augment Altern Commun 1999; 15 (04) 248-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Murray LL. Longitudinal treatment of primary progressive aphasia: a case study. Aphasiology 1998; 12 (7–8): 651-672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Rogers MA, Alarcon NB. Dissolution of spoken language in primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology 1998; 12 (7–8): 635-650
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Hinckley JJ, Douglas N, Goff R, Nakano E. Training partners to effectively support communication: what the clinician should do. In: Simmons-Mackie N, King J, Beukelman D. , eds. Supporting Communication for Adults with Acute and Chronic Aphasia. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing, Inc.; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Taylor C, Croot K, Power E, Savage SA, Hodges JR, Togher L. Trouble and repair during conversations of people with primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology 2014; 28 (8–9): 1069-1091
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Hopper T, Bourgeois M, Pimentel J. , et al. An evidence-based systematic review on cognitive interventions for individuals with dementia. J Speech-Lang Pat 2013; 22 (01) 126-145
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hinckley JJ, Hasselkus A, Ganzfried E. What people living with aphasia think about the availability of aphasia resources. J Speech-Lang Pat 2013; 22 (02) S310-S317
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ehlhardt L, Kennedy M. Instructional techniques in cognitive rehabilitation: a preliminary report. Semin Speech Lang 2005; 26 (04) 268-279
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Léger GC, Johnson N. A review on primary progressive aphasia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2007; 3 (06) 745-752
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 O'Connor CM, Ahmed S, Mioshi E. Functional disability in primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology 2014; 28 (8–9): 1131-1149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Rogalski E, Cobia D, Harrison TM. , et al. Anatomy of language impairments in primary progressive aphasia. J Neurosci 2011; 31 (09) 3344-3350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Simmons-Mackie N, Raymer A, Armstrong E, Holland A, Cherney LR. Communication partner training in aphasia: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91 (12) 1814-1837
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Garrett K, Beukelman D. Augmentative and Alternative Communication Approaches for Persons with Severe Aphasia. Augmentative Communication in the Acute Medical Setting. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Garrett KL, Beukelman DR. Changes in the interaction patterns of an individual with severe aphasia given three types of partner support. Clin Aphasiology. 1995; 23: 237-251
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Garrett KL, Huth C. The impact of graphic contextual information and instruction on the conversational behaviours of a person with severe aphasia. Aphasiology 2002; 16 (4–6): 523-536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Arroyo CG, Goldfarb R, Sands E. Caregiver training in an AAC intervention for severe aphasia. JSLP-ABA. 2012; 5 (3–4): 59-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Kaye RC, Cherney LR. Script templates: a practical approach to script training in aphasia. Top Lang Disord 2016; 36 (02) 136-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Youmans G, Holland A, Muñoz M, Bourgeois M. Script training and automaticity in two individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology 2005; 19 (3–5): 435-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Brandenburg C, Worrall L, Rodriguez AD, Copland D. Mobile computing technology and aphasia: an integrated review of accessibility and potential uses. Aphasiology 2013; 27 (04) 444-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Greig C-A, Harper R, Hirst T, Howe T, Davidson B. Barriers and facilitators to mobile phone use for people with aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008; 15 (04) 307-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Holland AL, Weinberg P, Dittelman J. How to use apps clinically in the treatment of aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 2012; 33 (03) 223-233
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Ramsberger G, Messamer P. Best practices for incorporating non-aphasia-specific apps into therapy. Semin Speech Lang 2014; 35 (01) 17-24
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Szabo G, Dittelman J. Using mobile technology with individuals with aphasia: native iPad features and everyday apps. Semin Speech Lang 2014; 35 (01) 5-16
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Rautakoski P. Training total communication. Aphasiology 2011; 25 (03) 344-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Elman R, Hoover E. Integrating communication support into aphasia group treatment. In: Simmons-Mackie N, King JM, Beukelman DR. , eds. Supporting Communication for Adults with Acute and Chronic Aphasia. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing; 2013: 189-220
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Power E, Thomas E, Worrall L. , et al. Development and validation of Australian aphasia rehabilitation best practice statements using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. BMJ Open 2015; 5 (07) e007641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar