Methods Inf Med 1983; 22(01): 29-36
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635417
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Morphosemantic Analysis of Compound Word Forms Denoting Surgical Procedures

Morphosemantische Analyse Zusammengesetzter Wortformen Zur Bezeichnung Chirurgischer Massnahmen
L. M. Norton
1   From the Laboratory of Statistical and Mathematical Methodology, Division of Computer Research and Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
,
M. G. Pacak
1   From the Laboratory of Statistical and Mathematical Methodology, Division of Computer Research and Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 February 2018 (online)

This paper describes a methodology for automated morphosemantic segmentation and semantic interpretation (paraphrasing rules) of medical compound word forms derived from Greek and Latin and denoting surgical procedures. Possible applications of such a procedure in medicine include the construction of computer-based medical dictionaries, automated processing of medical language, facilitation of international communication through national medical language, and vocabulary training for medical and paramedical personnel.

In dieser Arbeit wird eine Methodik zur automatischen morphosemantischen Segmentierung und semantischen Interpretation (Paraphrasierregeln) zusammengesetzter medizinischer Wortformen aus dem Griechischen und Lateinischen, die chirurgische Maßnahmen bezeichnen, beschrieben. Eine mögliche Anwendungsform eines solchen Verfahrens in der Medizin ist die Erstellung computerunterstützter medizinischer Wörterbücher, die automatische Verarbeitung der medizinischen Sprache, die Erleichterung der internationalen Kommunikation durch eine nationale medizinische Sprache und die Spracherziehung für medizinisches und paramedizinisches Personal.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ayers M. D.. English Words from Greek and Latin Elements. (Baltimore, Md.: Williams and Wilkins Co 1968
  • 2 Blakiston’s Gould Medical Dictionary. 4th Ed. New York, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill Book Co 1979
  • 3 Brown A. F.. Normal and Reverse English Word List.. Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania 1963
  • 4 Dorland’s Medical Dictionary. 24th Ed. Philadelphia, Pa.: Saunders 1965
  • 5 Dorland’s Medical Dictionary. 25th Ed. (Philadelphia, Pa.: Saunders 1974
  • 6 Marchand H.. English Word Formation.. München: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung 1969
  • 7 Pacak M. G., Dunham G. S.. Computers and Medical Language. Med. Inform 1979; 4: 13-27.
  • 8 Pacak M. G., Norton L. M., Dunham G. S.. Mor-phosemantic Analysis of -ITIS Forms in Medical Language. Meth. Inform. Med 1980; 19: 99-105.
  • 9 Pereira F. C. N., Warren D. H. D.. Definite Clause Grammars for Language Analysis—A Survey of the Formalism and a Comparison with Augmented Transition Networks.. Artificial Intelligence 1980; 13: 231-278.
  • 10 Pratt A. W.. Medicine, Computers, and Linguistics. In Kenedi R. M.. (Edit.) Advances in Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 3, pp.. 97-140 New York, N. Y.: Academic Press; 1973
  • 11 Stedman’s Medical Dictionary: 18th Ed. Baltimore, Md.: Williams and Wilkins Co.. 1966
  • 12 Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) Skokie, Ill.: College of American Pathologists. 1979
  • 13 Systematized Nomenclature of Pathology (SNOP) Chicago, 111.: College of American Pathologists. 1965
  • 14 Taber’s Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary: 13th Ed. Philadelphia, Pa.: F. A. Davis Co.. 1977