Informatics Methodologies for Evaluation Research in the Practice Setting

Abstract

A continuing challenge in health informatics and health evaluation is to enable access to the practice of health care so that the determinants of successful care and good health outcomes can be measured, evaluated and analysed. Furthermore the results of the analysis should be available to the health care practitioner or to the patient as might be appropriate, so that he or she can use this information for continual improvement of practice and optimisation of outcomes. In this paper we review two experiences, one in primary care, the FAMUS project, and the other in hospital care, the Autocontrol project. Each project demonstrates an informatics approach for evaluation research in the clinical setting and indicates ways in which useful information can be obtained which with appropriate feed-back and education can be used towards the achievement of better health. Emphasis is given to data collection methods compatible with practice and to high quality information feedback, particularly in the team context, to enable the formulation of strategies for practice improvement.

Keywords

Data Collection - Evaluation Research - Health Informatics - Clinical Strategies

• REFERENCES

• 1 McWhinney IR. General practice as an academic discipline. Lancet 1966; 1: 419-23.
• 2 Morrell D. Exploring general practice. Can Fam Phys 1982; 28: 448-9.
• 3 Perkin R. Family medicine research. Can Fam Phys 1993; 39: 733-4.
• 4 Wilson A, Pollock C, Weekes T, Dowell A. Can general practice provide useful information - evaluation of a primary health care information project in Northern England. J Epid and Coram Health 1995; 49: 227-30.
• 5 Morris B A. Community and university partners in research. Family Practice Research Journal 1993; 2: 123-30.
• 6 Roos NP, Roos LL. Small area variations, practice style, and quality of care. In Evans R, Barer ML, and Marmor TR. eds. The determinants of health of populations. New York: Aldine de Gruyter,; 1994: 231-52.
• 7 Murphy E, Spiegal N, Kinmonth AL. Will you help me with my research? Gaining access to primary care settings and subjects. Brit J General Practice 1992; 42: 162-5.
• 8 Middelkoop BJC, Bohnen AM, Duisterhout JS, Hoes AW, Pleumeekers HJCM, Prins A. Rotterdam general practitioners report (ROHAPRO): a computerised network of general practices in Rotterdam. The Netherlands. J Epid and Comm Health 1995; 49: 231-3.
• 9 Grant AM, Delisle E, Dubois S, Niyonsenga T, Benier R. Implementation of a province- wide computerized network in Quebec: the FAMUS project. MD Computing 1995; 12: 45-9.
• 10 Haynes RB, Hayward RSA, Lomas J. Bridges between health care research evidence and clinical practice. JAMIA 1995; 2: 342-50.
• 11 Tiernay WM, Overhage JM, Takesue BY, Harris LE, Murray MD, Vargo DL, McDonald CJ. Computerizing guidelines to improve care and patient outcomes: the example of heart failure. JAMIA 1995; 2: 316-22.
• 12 Battista RN, Hodge BA. Clinical practice guidelines: between science and art. Can Med Assoc J 1993; 148: 385-415.
• 13 Worrall G, Chaulk P, Freake D. The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 156: 1705-11.
• 14 Grant A, Richard Y, Deland E, Després N, De Lorenzi F, Dagenais A, Buteau M. Data collection and information presentation for optimal decision making by clinical managers – the Autocontrol project. Proceedings of the AMIA Fall Symposium. 1997: 789-93.
• 15 Vanasse A, Laplante P, Xhignesse M, Delisle E, Grant A, Bernier R. Monothérapie et hypertension non compliquée: Données du registre provincial FAMUS. Hypertension Canada 1995; juillet 3-7.
• 16 Niyonsenga T, Xhignesse M, Vanasse N, Delisle E, Laplante P, Grant A. Time related practice variation: effects of physician interventions on some cardiovascular disease risk factors. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Statistical Society. 1997
• 17 Grant AM, Lussier Y, Delisle E, Dubois S, Bernier R. The TEAM evaluation approach to Project FAMUS, a pan-Canadian risk register for primary care. In: SCAMC Proceedings. 1992; 14: 734-8.
• 18 Commentary in a survey of participants in the FAMUS project conducted by electronic mail. 1996
• 19 Dick RS, Steen EB eds. The Computer-based Patient Record, an Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences Press; 1997. (2nd ed.)
• 20 Roy C. L'implication des médecins dans le contrôle des coûts hospitaliers (Doctoral thesis). Université de Montpellier II; France: 1994
• 21 Bakken Henry S. Informatics: essential infrastructure for quality assessment and improvement in nursing. JAMIA 1995; 2: 169-82.