Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2006; 45(04): 377-383
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634091
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Computer-Assisted Analysis of 4D Cardiac MR Image Sequences after Myocardial Infarction

D. Säring
1   Dept. of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
J. Ehrhardt
1   Dept. of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
A. Stork
2   Dept. of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
M. P. Bansmann
2   Dept. of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
G. K. Lund
3   Dept. of Cardiology/Angiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
,
H. Handels
1   Dept. of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: Spatial-temporal MR image sequences of the heart contain information about shape and motion changes and pathological structures after myocardial infarction. In this paper a Heart Analysis Tool (HeAT) for the quantitative analysis of 4D MR image sequences of infarct patients is presented.

Methods: HeAT supports interactive segmentation of anatomical and pathological structures. Registration of Cine- and DE-MR image data is applied to enable their combined evaluation during the analysis process. Partitioning of the myocardium in segments enables the analysis with high local resolution. Corresponding segments are generated and used for inter/intra-patient comparison. Quantitative parameters were extracted and visualized.

Results: Parameters like endocard movement in the infarcted area of six infarct patients were computed in HeAT. Parameters in the infarct area show the expected dysfunctional characteristics. Based on theses parameters passive endocardial movement and myocardial areas with decreased contraction could be identified.

Conclusion: In contrast to other software tools HeAT supports the combination of contour information of Cine-MR and DE-MR, local analysis with high resolution and inter/intra patient comparison. HeAT enables an observer-independent evaluation of the complex cardiac image data. Using HeAT in further studies can increase the understanding of left ventricle(LV) remodeling.

Keywords

Image processing - myocardial infarct - Cine-magnetic resonance imaging - left ventricular remodeling - computer-assisted image analysis
 

  • References

  • 1 Stahmer S. et al. Myocardial infarction. http://www.emedicine.com
    PubMed
  • 2 Jackson BM, Gorman JHIII, Salgo IS, Moainie SL, Plappert T. St John-Sutton M, Edmunds Jr. LH, Gorman RC. Border zone geometry increases wall stress after myocardial infarction: contrast echocardiographic assessment. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003; 284: 475-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zimmerman SD, Criscione J, Covell JW. Remodeling in myocardium adjacent to an infarction in the pig left ventricle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004; 287: H2697-H2704.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Choi KM, Kim RJ, Gubernikoff G, Vargas JD, Parker M, Judd RM. Transmural extent of acute myocardium infarction predicts long-term improvement in contractile function. Circulation 2001; 104: 1101-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lund GK, Stork A, Saeed M, Bansmann MP, Gerken JH, Müller V, Mester J, Higgins CB, Adam G, Meinertz T. Acute Myocardial Infarction: Evaluation with First-Pass Enhancement and Delayed Enhancement MR Imaging Compared with 201Tl SPECT Imaging. Radiology 2004; 232: 49-57.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM. et al Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 97: 765-72.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 U.S. National Institute of Health. NIH Image. http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Shi P, Robinson G, Duncan J. Myocardial motion and function assessment using 4D images. IEEE Visualization in Biomedical Computing 1994; pp 148-59.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Buller VGM, van der Geest RJ, Kool MD, van der Wall EE, de Roos A, Reiber JHC. Assessment of regional left ventricular wall parameters from short-axis MR imaging using a 3D extension to the improved centerline method. Invest Radiol 1997; 32 (009) 529-39.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Paragios N.. Shape-based Segmentation and Tracking in Cardiac Image Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Medical Image Analysis 2003; pp 402-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Pfeifer B, Fischer G, Hanser F, Seger M, Hintermüller C, Modre-Osprian R, Trieb T, Tilg B. Atrial and ventricular myocardium extraction using model-based techniques. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45: 19-26.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Frangi F. et al. Three-Dimensional Modeling for Functional Analysis of Cardiac Images: A Review. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging; p 20.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Wu KC, Lima J. Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Improvement of Regional Myocardial Function in Patients after Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2002; 106: 1083-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wells WM, Viola P, Kikinis R.. Multimodal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. In: Proc Med Robot Comp Assist Surg. Baltimore 1995; pp 55-62.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Collignon A, Maes F, Delaere D, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P, Marchal G.. Automated multimodality image registration using information theory. In Bizais Y, Barillot C, Di Paola R. (eds.) Proc Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Ile de Berder, France 1995; pp 263-74.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Thirion JP. Non-rigid matching using demons. Proc Int. Conf Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’96) 1996
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V. et al Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart. American Heart Association, Inv. 2002
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sheehan FH, Bolson EL, Dodge HT, Mathey DG, Schofer J, Woo HW. Advantages and applications of the centerline method for characterizing regional ventricular function. Circulation 1986; 74: 293-305.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit (ITK). http://www.itk.org
    PubMed
  • 20 Yoo T.. Insight into Images - principles and practice for segmentation, registration and image analysis. 2004
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Schroeder W, Lorenson B.. Visualization Toolkit: An Object-Oriented Approach to 3-D Graphics. 1st. Prentice Hall PTR. 1996
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 König S, Hesser J. Live-Wires Using Path- Graphs. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43: 371-5.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 RSI. IDL: The Data Visualization & Analysis Platform. http://www.rsinc.com/idl/
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Oppelt A, Graumann R, Barfuss A. et al FISP: a new fast MRI sequence. Electromedica 1986; 54: 15-1852.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Zur Y, Wood ML, Neuringer LJ. Motion-insensitive, steady-state free precession imaging. Magn Reson Med 1990; 16: 444-59.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar