Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1991; 4(02): 48-53
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633252
Original Report
Schattauer GmbH

Stack Pinning of Long Bone Fractures: A Retrospective Study

Karen L. Gibson
1   From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
,
R. T. vanEe
1   From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received for publication 12 August 1990

Publication Date:
06 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Long bone fractures in 20 dogs and five cats were repaired using a stack pinning (multiple intramedullary pins) technique. These cases were evaluated with long-term radiographic and physical examination. Factors including fracture location, age of animal, fracture reduction, and percent of medullary cavity filled by intramedullary pins were noted to assess their effect on postoperative complications. Specifically, distal long bone fractures had a greater tendency to develop complications than did mid-shaft or proximal fractures (p = 0.10). Other factors were not found to significantly increase the potential for fracture related complications. The overall complication rate associated with this method of fracture repair was greater than 50%. External fixators or plates were judged necessary to improve fracture stability at initial or subsequent operations in 44% of cases. Stack pinning was found to be an unreliable method of repair for long bone fractures in this clinical study.

Keywords

Fracture - intramedullary pins
 

  • References

  • 1 Ehmer EA. Bone Pinning in Fractures of Small Animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1947; 110: 14-9..
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rudy RL. Principles of Intramedullary Pinning. Vet Clin North Am 1975; 5 (02) 209-28..
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chaffee VW. Multiple (Stacked) Intramedullary Pin Fixation of Humeral and Femoral Fractures. J Am An Hosp Assn 1977; 13: 599-601..
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kagan KG. Multiple intramedullary pin fixation of the femur of dogs and cats. J Am Vet med Assoc 1983; 182 (11) 1251-5..
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Matthiesen DT. Multiple Intramedullary Wire Fixation of a Radial Fracture in a Dog. Vet Surg 1984; 13 (03) 197-200..
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Vasseur PB, Paul HA, Crumley L. Evaluation of fixation devices for prevention of rotation in transverse fractures of the canine femoral shaft: an in vitro study. Am J Vet Res 1984; 45 (08) 1504-7..
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chaffee VW. Stack-pin technique in the humerus and femur. In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery. Bojrab MJ. (ed). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1983: 734-7.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Nunamaker David. Methods of internal fixation. In: Textbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics. Newton C, Nunamaker DA. (eds). Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co; 1985: 264-5.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 DeYoung DJ, Probst CW. Methods of internal fracture fixation. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter DH. (ed). Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.; 1985: 1954-7.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Dallman MJ, Martin RA, Self BP, Grant JW. Rotational strength of double pinning techniques in repair of transverse fractures of femurs in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1990; 51 (01) 123-7..
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rhinelander FW, Wilson JW. Blood supply to developing, mature, and healing bone. In: Bone in Clinical Orthopedics. Sumner-Smith G. (ed). Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1982: 118-32.
    Google Scholar