Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996; 09(04): 145-151
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632521
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Mechanical Comparison of Two Methods for Interfragmentary Fixation in a Short Oblique Fracture Model

B. A. Smith
1   From the Departments of Veterinary Clinical Sciences
,
S. C. Kerwin
1   From the Departments of Veterinary Clinical Sciences
,
G. Hosgood
1   From the Departments of Veterinary Clinical Sciences
,
G. Voyiadjis
2   Civil Engineering and Veterinary Physiology
,
R. Echle
2   Civil Engineering and Veterinary Physiology
,
G. M. Strain
3   Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received for publication 23 February 1996

Publication Date:
23 February 2018 (online)

Summary

Twenty mature and 20 immature cadaver dog femora had mid-diaphyseal osteotomies performed at 45° to the bone axis. Either a 3.5 mm cortical lag screw, or a 1.6 mm pin aligning a 1.0 mm (18 gauge) twist-tensioned cerclage wire, stabilized the osteotomy. A single episode of slow axial compression was applied to each construct. Slippage in the plane of the osteotomy occurred for all constructs. Neither bone fracture nor implant failure was observed. Forcedisplacement data were standardized with respect to bone cross-sectional surface area, and statistical comparisons of stress performed at 2%, 4%, and 10% strain. The lag screw constructs were significantly stronger at all three strain levels for mature bone, but only at 10% strain for immature bone. Both devices resisted axial compression to a degree likely to assist, but not to provide complete fracture stabilization. As such, these devices should only be employed in combination with sufficiently rigid primary fixation.

Oblique osteotomies in mature and immature dog femora were stabilized with either a lag screw or transfixation pin and cerclage wire. Constructs were loaded in axial compression and statistical analysis of stress performed at 2%, 4% and 10% strain. The lag screw constructs were significantly stronger at all strain levels for mature bone, but only at the highest strain level for immature bone.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 DeYoung DJ, Probst CW. Methods of internal fracture fixation. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 2nd edn. Slatter D. (ed) Philadelphia: Saunders; 1993: 1610-31.
  • 2 Hulse D, Hyman B. Fracture biology and biomechanics. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 2nd edn. Slatter D. (ed) Philadelphia: Saunders; 1993: 1595-610.
  • 3 Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R. et al Basic aspects of internal fixation. In: Manual of Internal Fixation: Techniques Recommended by the AO-ASIF Group. Allgower M. (ed) Berlin: Springer; 1991: 1-117.
  • 4 Aron DN. Oblique fractures: Special considerations for management. Comp Cont Ed Prac Vet 1990; 12: 1743-54.
  • 5 Pardo AD. Cerclage wiring and tension band fixation. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 2nd edn. Slatter D. (ed) Philadelphia: Saunders; 1993: 1631-40.
  • 6 Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R. et al Screws and plates and their application. In: Manual of Internal Fixation: Techniques Recommended by the AO-ASIF Group. Allgower M. (ed) Berlin: Springer; 1991: 79-193.
  • 7 Howard PE. Principles of intramedullary pin and wire fixation. Sem Vet Med Surg (S.A.) 1991; 6: 52-67.
  • 8 Lindahl O. Rigidity of immobilization of oblique fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1964; 35: 39-50.
  • 9 Matlloub HS, Jensen JR, Sanger JR. et al Spiral fracture fixation techniques: A biomechanical study. J Hand Surg 1993; 18 B 515-9.
  • 10 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MS, Soutas-Little RW. Force plate analysis of the walking gait in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1987; 48: 915-8.
  • 11 Yanoff SR, Hulse DA, Hogan HA. et al Measurement of vertical ground reaction force in jumping dogs. V. C. O. T 1992; 5: 44-50.
  • 12 Matushek KJ, Sumner-Smith G, Schatzker J. et al Dynamic strain in the canine tibia: an in vivo strain gauge analysis. V.C.O.T 1988; 2: 58-63.
  • 13 Carter DA, Spengler DM. Biomechanics of fracture. In: Bone in Clinical Orthopedics: A Study in Comparative Osteology. Sumner- Smith G. (ed) Philadelphia: Saunders; 1982: 305-34.
  • 14 Beer F, Johnston E. Friction. In: Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Statics. 5th edn. New York: McGraw - Hill; 1988: 317-23.
  • 15 Tillet ED, von Fraunhofer JA, Seligson D. Coefficient of frictrion at pig femoral osteotomies: the role of anatomic reduction and compression on the value of the coefficient. J Biomed Eng 1989; 11: 107-10.
  • 16 Blass CE, Piermattei DL, Withrow SJ. et al Static and dynamic cerclage wire analysis. Vet Surg 1986; 15: 181-4.
  • 17 Nunamaker DM, Perren SM. Force measurements in screw fixation. Biomechanics 1976; 9: 669-75.
  • 18 Sardinas J, Kraus K, Sisson R. Comparison of the holding power of 3.5-mm cortical versus 4.0-mm cancellous orthopedic screws in the pelvis of immature dogs (cadavers). Am J Vet Res 1995; 56: 248-51.
  • 19 Cheng SL, Smith TJ, Davey JR. A comparison of the strength and stability of six techniques of cerclage wire fixation for fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1993; 7: 221-5.
  • 20 Wilson JW, Belloli DM, Robbins T. Resistance of cerclage to knot failure. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985; 187: 389-91.
  • 21 Mott RL. Connections. In: Applied Strength of Materials. New Jersey: Prentice - Hall; 1978: 378-401.
  • 22 Torzilli PA, Takebe K, Burstein AH. et al The material properties of immature bone. J Biomech Eng 1982; 104: 12-20.
  • 23 Torzilli PA, Takebe K, Burstein AH. et al The structural properties of immature canine bone. J Biomech Eng 1981; 103: 232-8.