Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996; 09(03): 111-4
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632514
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Holding Power of Orthopaedic Screws in Bovine Femoral Heads. A Comparison of Three Cannulated Screws

D. G. Wilson
1   From the Comparative Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
,
R. P. McCabe
1   From the Comparative Orthopedic Research Laboratory, Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received for publication 20 December 1995

Publication Date:
23 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Femoral capital physeal fractures have been successfully repaired with 7.0 mm stainless steel cannulated screws. The holding power of 7.0 mm stainless steel cannulated screws, 8.0 mm stainless steel cannulated screws and 8.0 mm titanium cannulated screws was compared. The 8.0 mm titanium cannulated screw had the highest holding power, the 7.0 mm stainless steel cannulated screw was intermediate and the 8.0 mm stainless steel cannulated screw had the lowest holding power.

When placed in the bovine femoral head, 8.0 mm titanium cannulated screws have holding power greater than 8.0 mm stainless steel cannulated screws. A 7.0 mm stainless steel cannulated screw has intermediate holding power.

Keywords

Cannulated screw - holding power - femoral capital physeal fracture
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Fackelman GE, Nunamaker DM. Manual of Internal Fixation in the Horse. New York: Springer; 1982: 10-2.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Hughes AN, Jordan BA. The mechanical properties of surgical bone screws and some aspects of insertion practice. Injury 1972; 4: 25-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schatzker J, Sanderson R, Murnaghan JP. The holding power of orthopedic screws in vivo. Clin Orthop 1975; 108: 115-26.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wilson DG, Ulm MJ. Holding power of orthopaedic screws in bovine femoral heads: a comparison of 7.0 mm cannulated screws to 5.5 mm cortical and 6.5 mm cancellous screws. V.C.O.T. 1993; 6: 160-2.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ansell RH, Scales JT. A study of some factors which affect the strength of screws and their insertion and holding power in bone. Biomechanics 1968; 1: 279-302.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual of Internal Fixation. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 1979: 30-3.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Yovich JV, Turner AS, Smith FW, Davis DM. Holding power of orthopedic screws: comparison of self-tapped and pre-tapped screws in foal bone. Vet Surg 1986; 15: 55-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wilson DG, Crawford WH, Stone WC, Frampton JW. Fixation of femoral capital physeal fractures with 7.0 mm cannulated screws in five bulls. Vet Surg 1991; 20: 240-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rehnberg L, Olerud C. Subchondral screw fixation for femoral neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1989; 71 B 178-80.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Brooks DB, Burstein AH, Frankel VH. The biomechanics of torsional fractures: the stress concentration effect of a drill hole. Bone Joint Surg 1970; 52-A: 507-14.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mather BS. The symmetry of the mechanical properties of the human femur. J Surg Res 1967; 7: 222-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hanson PD, Markel MD. Diaphyseal structural properties of equine long bones. Am J Vet Res 1995; 56: 233-40.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar