Nuklearmedizin 1992; 31(03): 80-83
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1629606
Originalarbeiten
Schattauer GmbH

Diagxxnostic Accuracy of 99mTc-Anti-CEA Immuno- scintigraphy in Patients with Liver Metastases from Colorectal Carcinoma

E. Bock
1   From the Departments of Nuclear Medicine
,
W. Becker
1   From the Departments of Nuclear Medicine
,
J. Scheele
2   From the Departments of Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nürnberg, FRG
,
F. Wolf
1   From the Departments of Nuclear Medicine
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 05 August 1991

16 December 1991

Publication Date:
04 February 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

17 Patienten mit 43 Lebermetastasen kolorektaler Karzinome wurden der Immunszintigraphie (IS) mit 99mTc-markierten monoklonalen Anti-CEA-Antikörpern (BW 431/26) unterzogen. Im Hinblick auf die Gesamtzahl der Raumforderungen wurden Sensitivität und diagnostische Treffsicherheit mit 21% bestimmt, bezogen auf die Patientenzahl betrugen sie 47% (mindestens eine positive Darstellung bei multiplen Metastasen) bzw. 77% bei nur einer Solitärmetastase. Die Sensitivität wurde durch Verwendung der SPECT- Technik nicht wesentlich verbessert. Eine Korrelation mit den Serum-CEA- Spiegeln ließ sich nicht nachweisen. Am besten schienen sich Lebermetastasen mittlerer Größe mit mäßiger Tumornekrose darzustellen. Die Ursache für die geringe Sensitivität ist vor allem in der ausgeprägten unspezifischen Anreicherung 99mTc-markierter Antikörper im RES der Leber zu sehen. Im Augenblick scheint die Immunszintigraphie lediglich eine ergänzende Methode zu konventionellen diagnostischen Maßnahmen darzustellen.

Summary

17 patients with 43 liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma were studied by immunoscintigraphy (IS) using a 99mTc-labelled monoclonal anti-CEA antibody (BW 431/26). Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were 21 % for alf liver lesions, but 47% considering the number of patients (at least one positive finding out of multiple metastases) and 77% in patients with a single metastasis. SPECT imaging did not improve sensitivity markedly in this series. There was no correlation with CEA serum levels. Liver metastases of intermediate size with moderate tumour necrosis seem to be favourable to IS. Major reason for the low sensitivity is the poor tumour-to-background ratio caused by high unspecific uptake of 99mTc-labelled antibodies in the RES of the liver. At the moment, IS seems be only a supplementary method to conventional diagnostic procedures.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Abdel-Nabi HH, Schwartz AN, Goldfogel G. et al. Colorectal tumors: Scintigraphy with In-111 anti- CEA monoclonal antibody and correlation with surgical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical findings. Radiology 1988; 166: 747-52.
  • 2 Andrew SM, Perkins AC, Pimm MV. et al. A comparison of iodine and indium-labelled anti- CEA antibody, F(ab)2 and Fab fragments by imaging tumour xenografts. Eur J Nucl Med 1988; 13: 598-604.
  • 3 Bares R, Fass J, Truong S. et al. Radioimmunszintigraphie mit SPECT: Methodik, Probleme und klinische Erfahrungen. Nucl-Med 1987; 26: 202-5.
  • 4 Bares R. Immunszintigraphie kolorektaler Tumoren: Probleme und Grenzen der Methode. Nuklearmediziner 1990; 13: 173-81.
  • 5 Baum RP, Hernaiz PDriever, Drahovsky D, Hör G. A rapid method for the determination of human CEA/mouse anti-CEA immune complexes in patients undergoing immunoscintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med 1989; 15: 321-5.
  • 6 Baum RP, Hertel A, Lorenz M. et al. 99mTc- labelled anti-CEA monoclonal antibody for tumour immunoscintigraphy: First clinical results. Nucl Med Comm 1989; 10: 345-52.
  • 7 Bosslet K, Lüben G, Schwarz A. et al. Immunohis- tochemical localization and molecular characteristics of three monoclonal antibody-defined epitopes detectable on carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Int J Cancer 1985; 36: 75-84.
  • 8 Bosslet K, Steinsträßer A, Schwarz A. et al. Quantitative considerations supporting the irrelevance of circulating serum CEA for the immunoscintigraphic visualization of CEA expressing carcinomas. Eur J Nucl Med 1988; 14: 523-8.
  • 9 Chetanneau A, Lehur PA, Ripoche D. et al. Histological correlation of 17 prospective immunoscintigraphies of recurrences of colorectal carcinomas using indium-111-labeled anti-CEA and (or) 19-9 monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Nucl Med 1989; 15: 302-6.
  • 10 Delaloye B, Bischof-Delaloye A, Buchegger F. et al. Detection of colorectal carcinoma by emission- computerized tomography after injection of l23l- labeled Fab or F(ab’)2 fragments from monoclonal anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibodies. J Clin Invest 1986; 77: 301-11.
  • 11 Dvorak HF, Nagy JA, Dvorak JT, Dvorak AM. Identification and characterisation of the blood vessels of solid tumors that are leaky to circulating macromolecules. Am J Path 1988; 133: 95-109.
  • 12 Goldenberg DM, Preston DF, Primus FJ, Hansen HJ. Photoscan localization of GW-39 tumors in hamsters using radiolabeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen immunoglobulin G. Cancer Res 1974; 34: 1-9.
  • 13 Goldenberg DM, DeLand F, Kim E. et al. Use of radiolabeled antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen for the detection and localization of diverse cancers by external photoscanning. N Engl J Med 1978; 298: 1384-8.
  • 14 Heuser LS, Miller FN. Differential macromolecular leakage from the vasculature of tumors. Cancer 1986; 57: 461-4.
  • 15 Leitha T, Baur M, Steger G. et al. Anti-CEA- Immunszintigraphie in der postoperativen Nachsorge von Tumorpatienten. Wien Klin Wschr 1990; 17: 503-9.
  • 16 Mach JP, Carrel S, Merenda C. et al. In vivo localization of radiolabeled antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen in human colon carcinoma grafted on to nude mice. Nature 1974; 248: 704-6.
  • 17 Mach JP, Carrel S, Forni M. et al. Tumor localization of radiolabeled antibodies against carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1980; 303: 5-10.
  • 18 Sands H, Jones PL. Physiology of monoclonal antibody accretion by tumors. In: Cancer imaging with radiolabeled antibodies. Goldenberg DM. (ed). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Acad Publ; 1990: 97-122.