Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2011; 50(01): 96-99
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625346
Letter to the Editor
Schattauer GmbH

Discussion of “Generalized Estimating Equations: Notes on the Choice of the Working Correlation Matrix” – Continued

J. Shults
1   Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

 

 

  • References

  • 1 Ziegler A, Vens M. Generalized Estimating Equations: Notes on the Choice of the Working Correlation Matrix. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49 (05) 421-425.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Breitung J, Chaganty NR, Daniel RM, Kenward MG, Lechner M, Martus P, Sabo RT, Wang Y-G, Zorn C. Discussion of “Generalized Estimating Equations: Notes on the Choice of the Working Correlation Matrix”. Methods Inf Me 2010; 49 (05) 426-432.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Molenberghs G. Editorial: Generalized Estimating Equations: Notes on the Choice of the Working Correlation Matrix‘. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49 (05) 419-420.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Prentice RL. Correlated Binary Regression with Covariates Specific to Each Binary Observation. Biometrics 1988; 44 (04) 1033-1048.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Shults J, Sun W, Tu X, Kim H, Amsterdam J, Hilbe J, Ten-Have T. A Comparison of Several Approaches for Choosing Between Working Correlation Structures in Generalized Estimating Equation Analysis of Longitudinal Binary Data. Statistics in Medicine 2009; 28 (08) 2338-2355.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wang YG, Carey VJ. Working Correlation Misspecification, Estimation and Covariate Design: Implications for Generalized Estimating Equations Performance. Biometrika 2003; 90 (01) 29-41.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shults J, Sun W, Tu X, Amsterdam J. On the Violation of Bounds for the Correlation in Generalized Estimating Equation Analyses of Binary Data from Longitudinal Trials. UPenn Biostatistics Working Papers. Working Paper 8. 2006 http://biostats.bepress.com/upennbiostat/papers/art8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kim H, Shults J. %QLS SAS Macro: a SAS Macro for Analysis of Correlated Data Using Quasi-Least Squares. Journal of Statistical Software 2010; 35 (02) 1-21.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hilbe J. Logistic Regression Models. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Kim H, Hilbe JM, Shults J. On the Designation of the Patterned Associations for Longitudinal Bernoulli Data: Weight Matrix versus True Correlation Structure?. UPenn Biostatistics Working Papers. Working Paper 26. 2008; http://biostats.bepress.com/upennbiostat/papers/art26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chaganty NR, Joe H. Range of Correlation Matrices for Dependent Bernoulli Random Variables. Biometrika 2006; 93 (01) 197-206.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Molenberghs G, Kenward MG. Semi-parametric Marginal Models for Hierarchical Data and their Corresponding Full Models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2010; 54 (02) 585-597.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rochon J. Application of GEE Procedures for Sample Size Calculations in Repeated Measures Experiments. Statistics in Medicine 1998; 17 (14) 1643-1658.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang KY, Zeger SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Molenberghs G, Verbeke G. Models for Discrete Longitudinal Data. New York: Springer; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Shults J, Ratcliffe SJ, Leonard M. Improved Generalized Estimating Equation Analysis via xtqls for Quasi-Least Squares in Stata. The Stata Journal 2007; 7 (02) 147-166.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar