Methods Inf Med 2010; 49(03): 269-270
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625339
Special Topic – Editorial
Schattauer GmbH

Health Informatics Meets eHealth

E. Ammenwerth
1   UMIT – University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria
,
G. Schreier
2   AIT – Austrian Institute of Technology, Graz, Austria
,
D. Hayn
2   AIT – Austrian Institute of Technology, Graz, Austria
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History





Publication Date:
17 January 2018 (online)

 

 
  • References

  • 1 Haux R. Individualization, globalization and health – about sustainable information technologies and the aim of medical informatics. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75 (12) 795-808.
  • 2 Kim GR, Lehmann CU. In search of dialogue and discourse in applied clinical informatics. ACI 2009; 0 (01) 1-9. doi: 10.4338/ACI09-10-0002. http://www.aci-journal.org.
  • 3 Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. A viewpoint on Evidence-based Health Informatics, based on a pilot survey on evaluation studies in health care informatics. JAMIA 2007; 14 (03) 368-371.
  • 4 Kuhn KA, Giuse DA, Lapão L, Wurst SH. Expanding the scope of health information systems – from hospitals to regional networks, to national infrastructures, and beyond. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (04) 500-502.
  • 5 Eysenbach G. What is e-health?. J Med Internet Res 2001; 3 (02) e20. http://www.jmir.org/2001/2/e20.
  • 6 Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo S, Dookhy R, Doarn CR, Prakash N, Merrell RC. What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. J Telemed J E Health 2007; 13 (05) 573-590.
  • 7 Ruland CM, Brynhi H, Andersen R, Bryhni T. Developing a shared electronic health record for patients and clinicians. In: Andersen SK, Klein MCA, Schluz S, Aarts J, Mazzoleni MC. (eds). eHealth beyond the horizon – get IT there. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 136: 57-62.
  • 8 Arnrich B, Mayora O, Bardram J, Tröster G. Pervasive Healthcare. Paving the way for a pervasive, user-centered and preventive healthcare model. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49: 67-73.
  • 9 Stroetmann KA, Jones T, Dobrev A, Stroetmann VN. eHealth is worth it. The economic benefits of implemented eHealth solutions at ten European sites. European Commission; 2006 http://www.ehealth-impact.org/download/documents/ehealthimpactsept2006.pdf.
  • 10 Iakovidis I, Wilson P, Healy JC. The road ahead. In: Iakovidis I, Wilson P, Healy JC. (eds). E-Health: Current Situation and Examples of Implemented and Beneficial E-Health Applications. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 100: 246-249.
  • 11 Lintonen TP, Konu AI, Seedhouse D. Information technology in health promotion. Health Educ Res 2008; 23 (03) 560-566. Epub 2007 Feb 13.
  • 12 Kuhn KA, Giuse DA. From hospital information systems to health information systems. Problems, challenges, perspectives. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40 (04) 275-287.
  • 13 Koch S. Ubiquitous care in aging societies – a social challenge. In: Blobel B, Pharow P, Nerlich M. (eds). eHealth: Combining Health Telematics, Telemedicine, Biomedical Engineering and Bioinformatics to the Edge. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 134: 89-95.
  • 14 The eHealth-conference series, organized by the Working Group “Medical Informatics” of the Austrian Computer Society (OCG) and the Austrian Society for Biomedical Technologies (ÖGBMT). www.eHealth2007.at, www.eHealth2008.at, www.eHealth2009.at, www.eHealth2010.at.
  • 15 Rinner C, Janzek-Hawlat S, Sibinovic S, Duftschmid G. Semantic validation of standard-based electronic health record documents with W3C XML Schema. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49: 271-280.
  • 16 Namli T, Dogac A. Testing conformance and inter-operability of eHealth applications. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49: 281-289.
  • 17 Pfeifer B, Hanser F, Seger M, Netzer M, Osl M, Modre-Osprian R, Schreier G, Wurz M, Baumgartner C. An epidemiologic modeling and data integration framework. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49: 290-296.