J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018; 79(04): 279-284
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1617757
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Postoperative Reduction of Intraventricular Hemorrhage Volume: Single- Versus Dual-Catheter Drainage

Syed Shahzad Hussain
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Asif Raza
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Saman Shahid
2   Foundation for Advancement of Science and Technology (FAST), National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (NUCES), Lahore, Pakistan
,
Hafiz Hamza Asif
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
3   National Hospital & Medical Care, DHA, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Usman Ahmad
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
,
Naveed Ashraf
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 April 2017

23 October 2017

Publication Date:
18 January 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background/Aims The use of single/dual external ventricular drains (EVD) for reducing intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is under investigation. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare postoperative reduction of IVH volume using single- and dual-catheter drainage in spontaneous IVH patients. We investigated factors that may influence an effective hematoma volume reduction by EVDs.

Materials and Methods The average cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage volumes were analyzed. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed on admission, 24 hours and 48 hours after EVD placement, and then on days 5 and 8. Patient group 1 was treated with a single EVD; patient group 2 was treated with bilateral EVDs. The IVH volume was calculated in all ventricles. A multivariate analysis was conducted to investigate variables that can influence the extent of hematoma volume reduction with a bilateral EVD. Regression followed by a Pearson correlation was performed to observe the strength of association of cofounders with the IVH volume reduction.

Results The percentage of IVH volume change was found to be significantly higher in the dual-catheter group compared with the single-catheter group (p = 0.0034) after 5 days of EVD. The mean reduction in IVH volume was 17.36 (mL) in patients ≤ 45 years of age and 20.50 (mL) in patients > 45 years. The multivariate analysis suggested the following significant predictors for IVH volume reduction: age of the patient (p = 0.011) and longer duration (days) of EVD (p = 0.028). The age of the patient had a weak positive association and duration of EVD had a positive association with the IVH volume reduction.

Conclusion Intraventricular drainage via bilateral EVDs may provide a better draining of blood-mixed CSF because it led to faster clot clearance. It is suggested that a longer duration of bilateral EVDs may lead to a greater reduction in IVH volume. Older patients may experience a greater IVH volume reduction by EVD because the volume of CSF increases with cerebral atrophy.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study that conformed to institutional ethical standards. The study was approved by the institutional ethical review committee.


 
  • References

  • 1 Ehtisham A, Taylor S, Bayless L, Klein MW, Janzen JM. Placement of external ventricular drains and intracranial pressure monitors by neurointensivists. Neurocrit Care 2009; 10 (02) 241-247
  • 2 Baum GR, Hooten KG, Lockney DT. , et al; EVD Best Practice Team. External ventricular drain practice variations: results from a nationwide survey. J Neurosurg 2017; 13: 1-8
  • 3 Herrick DB, Ullman N, Nekoovaght-Tak S. , et al. Determinants of external ventricular drain placement and associated outcomes in patients with spontaneous intraventricular hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2014; 21 (03) 426-434
  • 4 Lovasik BP, McCracken DJ, McCracken CE. , et al. The effect of external ventricular drain use in intracerebral hemorrhage. World Neurosurg 2016; 94: 309-318
  • 5 Qureshi AI, Tuhrim S, Broderick JP, Batjer HH, Hondo H, Hanley DF. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2001; 344 (19) 1450-1460
  • 6 Rashid HU, Amin R, Rahman A. , et al. Correlation between intracerebral hemorrhage score and surgical outcome of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2013; 39 (01) 1-5
  • 7 Dey M, Stadnik A, Awad IA. Spontaneous intracerebral and intraventricular hemorrhage: advances in minimally invasive surgery and thrombolytic evacuation, and lessons learned in recent trials. Neurosurgery 2014; 74 (Suppl. 01) S142-S150
  • 8 Binz DD, Toussaint III LG, Friedman JA. Hemorrhagic complications of ventriculostomy placement: a meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care 2009; 10 (02) 253-256
  • 9 Dennis MS, Burn JP, Sandercock PA, Bamford JM, Wade DT, Warlow CP. Long-term survival after first-ever stroke: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke 1993; 24 (06) 796-800
  • 10 Oehmichen M, Auer RN, König HG. Forensic Neuropathology and Associated Neurology. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media; 2006
  • 11 Murry KR, Rhoney DH, Coplin WM. Urokinase in the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage. Ann Pharmacother 1998; 32 (02) 256-258
  • 12 Li Y, Zhang H, Wang X. , et al. Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8 (11) e80599
  • 13 Melo TP, Pinto AN, Ferro JM. Headache in intracerebral hematomas. Neurology 1996; 47 (02) 494-500
  • 14 Hinson HE, Hanley DF, Ziai WC. Management of intraventricular hemorrhage. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2010; 10 (02) 73-82
  • 15 Hameed B, Khealani BA, Mozzafar T, Wasay M. Prognostic indicators in patients with primary intraventricular haemorrhage. J Pak Med Assoc 2005; 55 (08) 315-317
  • 16 Coplin WM, Vinas FC, Agris JM. , et al. A cohort study of the safety and feasibility of intraventricular urokinase for nonaneurysmal spontaneous intraventricular hemorrhage. Stroke 1998; 29 (08) 1573-1579
  • 17 Steiner T, Diringer MN, Schneider D. , et al. Dynamics of intraventricular hemorrhage in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: risk factors, clinical impact, and effect of hemostatic therapy with recombinant activated factor VII. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (04) 767-773 ; discussion 773–774
  • 18 Hallevi H, Albright KC, Aronowski J. , et al. Intraventricular hemorrhage: anatomic relationships and clinical implications. Neurology 2008; 70 (11) 848-852
  • 19 Passero S, Ulivelli M, Reale F. Primary intraventricular haemorrhage in adults. Acta Neurol Scand 2002; 105 (02) 115-119
  • 20 Barkley JM, Morales D, Hayman LA, Diaz-Marchan PJ. Static neuroimaging in the evaluation of TBI. In: Zasler ND, Katz DI, Zafonte RD. , eds. Brain Injury Medicine: Principles and Practices. New York, NY: Demos; 2007: 129-148
  • 21 Giroud M, Gras P, Chadan N. , et al. Cerebral haemorrhage in a French prospective population study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991; 54 (07) 595-598
  • 22 Sacco RL, Mayer SA. Epidemiology of intracerebral hemorrhage. In: Feldmann E. , ed. Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1994: 3-23
  • 23 Broderick JP, Brott T, Tomsick T, Miller R, Huster G. Intracerebral hemorrhage more than twice as common as subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 1993; 78 (02) 188-191
  • 24 Chiewvit P, Danchaivijitr N, Nilanont Y, Poungvarin N. Computed tomographic findings in non-traumatic hemorrhagic stroke. J Med Assoc Thai 2009; 92 (01) 73-86
  • 25 Kakarla UK, Kim LJ, Chang SW, Theodore N, Spetzler RF. Safety and accuracy of bedside external ventricular drain placement. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (01) (Suppl. 01) ONS162-ONS166 ; discussion ONS166–ONS167
  • 26 Hinson HE, Melnychuk E, Muschelli J, Hanley DF, Awad IA, Ziai WC. Drainage efficiency with dual versus single catheters in severe intraventricular hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2012; 16 (03) 399-405
  • 27 Muralidharan R. External ventricular drains: management and complications. Surg Neurol Int 2015; 6 (Suppl. 06) S271-S274
  • 28 Bhattathiri P, Gregson B, Prasad K, Mendelow A. ; STICH Investigators. Intraventricular hemorrhage and hydrocephalus after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: results from the STICH trial. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2006; 96: 65-68
  • 29 Du B, Wang J, Zhong XL. , et al. Single versus bilateral external ventricular drainage for intraventricular fibrinolysis using urokinase in severe ventricular haemorrhage. Brain Inj 2014; 28 (11) 1413-1416
  • 30 Staykov D, Huttner HB, Lunkenheimer J. , et al. Single versus bilateral external ventricular drainage for intraventricular fibrinolysis in severe ventricular haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010; 81 (01) 105-108
  • 31 Jaffe J, Melnychuk E, Muschelli J. , et al. Ventricular catheter location and the clearance of intraventricular hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (05) 1258-1263 ; discussion 1263–1264
  • 32 Wanifuchi H, Shimizu T, Maruyama T. Age-related changes in the proportion of intracranial cerebrospinal fluid space measured using volumetric computerized tomography scanning. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (03) 607-610
  • 33 Matsumae M, Kikinis R, Mórocz IA. , et al. Age-related changes in intracranial compartment volumes in normal adults assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 1996; 84 (06) 982-991
  • 34 Fried HI, Nathan BR, Rowe AS. , et al. The insertion and management of external ventricular drains: an evidence-based consensus statement: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care 2016; 24 (01) 61-81
  • 35 Daverat P, Castel JP, Dartigues JF, Orgogozo JM. Death and functional outcome after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. A prospective study of 166 cases using multivariate analysis. Stroke 1991; 22 (01) 1-6