Am J Perinatol 2018; 35(01): 024-030
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604412
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Maternal Gut Microbiome Biodiversity in Pregnancy

Marcela C. Smid
1   Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
,
Nitasha M. Ricks
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
,
Alexis Panzer
3   School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
,
Amber N. Mccoy
4   Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
,
M. Andrea Azcarate-Peril
4   Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
,
Temitope O. Keku
4   Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
,
Kim A. Boggess
1   Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

11 January 2017

24 June 2017

Publication Date:
27 July 2017 (online)

Abstract

Objective To measure maternal gut microbiome biodiversity in pregnancy.

Materials and Methods In phase 1, maternal fecal samples were collected by rectal swab in 20 healthy pregnant women (14–28 weeks gestation) to measure bacterial abundance. In phase 2, fecal samples were collected from 31 women at enrollment (<20 weeks gestation, baseline) and at 36 to 39 weeks of gestation (follow-up). We assessed cluster analysis to assess bacterial community profiles at the phylum level longitudinally through pregnancy. DNA was extracted from swabs, followed by PCR of the bacterial 16s rRNA gene and multiplex high-throughput sequencing (Ion Torrent).

Results In phase 1, 16 of 20 samples yielded usable data. White women (n = 10) had greater abundance of Firmicutes (23 ± 0.15 vs. 16% ± 0.75, p = 0.007) and Bacteroidetes (24 ± 0.14 vs. 19% ± 0.68, p = 0.015) compared with non-White women (n = 6). In the 11 paired specimens, Bacteroidetes increased in abundance from baseline to follow-up. Compared with women who gained weight below the median gestational weight gain (GWG, <15.4 kg), those who gained above the median GWG had increased abundance of Bacteroidetes (p = 0.02) and other phyla (p = 0.04).

Conclusion Maternal microbiome biodiversity changes as pregnancy progresses and correlates with GWG.

 
  • References

  • 1 Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 2006; 444 (7122): 1027-1031
  • 2 Jumpertz R, Le DS, Turnbaugh PJ. , et al. Energy-balance studies reveal associations between gut microbes, caloric load, and nutrient absorption in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94 (01) 58-65
  • 3 Ley RE, Bäckhed F, Turnbaugh P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD, Gordon JI. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102 (31) 11070-11075
  • 4 Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 2006; 444 (7122): 1022-1023
  • 5 Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T. , et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 2009; 457 (7228): 480-484
  • 6 Arora T, Sharma R. Fermentation potential of the gut microbiome: implications for energy homeostasis and weight management. Nutr Rev 2011; 69 (02) 99-106
  • 7 Koren O, Goodrich JK, Cullender TC. , et al. Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell 2012; 150 (03) 470-480
  • 8 Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J. , et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 2010; 7 (05) 335-336
  • 9 DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N. , et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72 (07) 5069-5072
  • 10 White JR, Nagarajan N, Pop M. Statistical methods for detecting differentially abundant features in clinical metagenomic samples. PLOS Comput Biol 2009; 5 (04) e1000352
  • 11 Hollister EB, Gao C, Versalovic J. Compositional and functional features of the gastrointestinal microbiome and their effects on human health. Gastroenterology 2014; 146 (06) 1449-1458
  • 12 Pflughoeft KJ, Versalovic J. Human microbiome in health and disease. Annu Rev Pathol 2012; 7: 99-122
  • 13 Picklesimer AH, Jared HL, Moss K, Offenbacher S, Beck JD, Boggess KA. Racial differences in C-reactive protein levels during normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (05) 523.e1-523.e6
  • 14 Collado MC, Isolauri E, Laitinen K, Salminen S. Distinct composition of gut microbiota during pregnancy in overweight and normal-weight women. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 88 (04) 894-899
  • 15 Santacruz A, Collado MC, García-Valdés L. , et al. Gut microbiota composition is associated with body weight, weight gain and biochemical parameters in pregnant women. Br J Nutr 2010; 104 (01) 83-92
  • 16 Budding AE, Grasman ME, Eck A. , et al. Rectal swabs for analysis of the intestinal microbiota. PLoS One 2014; 9 (07) e101344
  • 17 Araújo-Pérez F, McCoy AN, Okechukwu C. , et al. Differences in microbial signatures between rectal mucosal biopsies and rectal swabs. Gut Microbes 2012; 3 (06) 530-535
  • 18 David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN. , et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 2014; 505 (7484): 559-563
  • 19 De Filippo C, Cavalieri D, Di Paola M. , et al. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107 (33) 14691-14696
  • 20 Davenport ER, Mizrahi-Man O, Michelini K, Barreiro LB, Ober C, Gilad Y. Seasonal variation in human gut microbiome composition. PLoS One 2014; 9 (03) e90731
  • 21 DeVader SR, Neeley HL, Myles TD, Leet TL. Evaluation of gestational weight gain guidelines for women with normal prepregnancy body mass index. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110 (04) 745-751
  • 22 Cedergren M. Effects of gestational weight gain and body mass index on obstetric outcome in Sweden. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006; 93 (03) 269-274