J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78(06): 466-472
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603974
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

An Innovate Robotic Endoscope Guidance System for Transnasal Sinus and Skull Base Surgery: Proof of Concept

D. T. Friedrich
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
,
F. Sommer
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
,
M. O. Scheithauer
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
,
J. Greve
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
,
T. K. Hoffmann
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
,
P. J. Schuler
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

25 April 2017

16 May 2017

Publication Date:
21 July 2017 (online)

Abstract

Objective Advanced transnasal sinus and skull base surgery remains a challenging discipline for head and neck surgeons. Restricted access and space for instrumentation can impede advanced interventions. Thus, we present the combination of an innovative robotic endoscope guidance system and a specific endoscope with adjustable viewing angle to facilitate transnasal surgery in a human cadaver model.

Materials and Methods The applicability of the robotic endoscope guidance system with custom foot pedal controller was tested for advanced transnasal surgery on a fresh frozen human cadaver head. Visualization was enabled using a commercially available endoscope with adjustable viewing angle (15–90 degrees).

Results Visualization and instrumentation of all paranasal sinuses, including the anterior and middle skull base, were feasible with the presented setup. Controlling the robotic endoscope guidance system was effectively precise, and the adjustable endoscope lens extended the view in the surgical field without the common change of fixed viewing angle endoscopes.

Conclusion The combination of a robotic endoscope guidance system and an advanced endoscope with adjustable viewing angle enables bimanual surgery in transnasal interventions of the paranasal sinuses and the anterior skull base in a human cadaver model. The adjustable lens allows for the abandonment of fixed-angle endoscopes, saving time and resources, without reducing the quality of imaging.

Ethical Approval

For this study, a human cadaver was utilized. The specimen used was from a voluntary body donor. All procedures performed in studies involving the human cadaver were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


 
  • References

  • 1 Linder TE, Simmen D, Stool SE. Revolutionary inventions in the 20th century. The history of endoscopy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123 (11) 1161-1163
  • 2 Orlandi RR, Kingdom TT, Hwang PH. , et al. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2016; 6 (Suppl. 01) S22-S209
  • 3 Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Nicolai P. , et al; European Rhinologic Society Advisory Board on Endoscopic Techniques in the Management of Nose, Paranasal Sinus and Skull Base Tumours. European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base. Rhinol Suppl 2010; 22 (22) 1-143
  • 4 Nyquist GG, Anand VK, Mehra S, Kacker A, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal repair of anterior skull base non-traumatic cerebrospinal fluid leaks, meningoceles, and encephaloceles. J Neurosurg 2010; 113 (05) 961-966
  • 5 Snyderman CH, Kassam AB, Carrau R, Mintz A. Endoscopic reconstruction of cranial base defects following endonasal skull base surgery. Skull Base 2007; 17 (01) 73-78
  • 6 Hoffmann TK, El Hindy N, Müller OM. , et al. Vascularised local and free flaps in anterior skull base reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270 (03) 899-907
  • 7 Liu JK, Wong A, Eloy JA. Combined endoscopic and open approaches in the management of sinonasal and ventral skull base malignancies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2017; 50 (02) 331-346
  • 8 Folbe AJ, Svider PF, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Endoscopic resection of clival malignancies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2017; 50 (02) 315-329
  • 9 Tomazic PV, Stammberger H, Mokry M, Gerstenberger C, Habermann W. Endoscopic resection of odontoid process in Arnold Chiari malformation type II. B-ENT 2011; 7 (03) 209-213
  • 10 Tabaee A, Anand VK, Barrón Y. , et al. Endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 2009; 111 (03) 545-554
  • 11 Szyfter W, Borucki Ł, Wróbel M. Four hands surgery in endoscopic sinus surgery--our experience [Article in Polish]. Otolaryngol Pol 2008; 62 (01) 7-10
  • 12 Briner HR, Simmen D, Jones N. Endoscopic sinus surgery: advantages of the bimanual technique. Am J Rhinol 2005; 19 (03) 269-273
  • 13 Friedrich DT, Scheithauer MO, Greve J, Hoffmann TK, Schuler PJ. Recent advances in robot-assisted head and neck surgery. Int J Med Robot 2016
  • 14 Mendelsohn AH, Remacle M. Transoral robotic surgery for laryngeal cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 23 (02) 148-152
  • 15 Dowthwaite S, Nichols AC, Yoo J. , et al. Transoral robotic total laryngectomy: report of 3 cases. Head Neck 2013; 35 (11) E338-E342
  • 16 O'Malley Jr BW, Quon H, Leonhardt FD, Chalian AA, Weinstein GS. Transoral robotic surgery for parapharyngeal space tumors. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2010; 72 (06) 332-336
  • 17 Song CM, Cho YH, Ji YB, Jeong JH, Kim DS, Tae K. Comparison of a gasless unilateral axillo-breast and axillary approach in robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (10) 3769-3775
  • 18 Lee HS, Kim WS, Hong HJ. , et al. Robot-assisted supraomohyoid neck dissection via a modified face-lift or retroauricular approach in early-stage cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a comparative study with conventional technique. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19 (12) 3871-3878
  • 19 Dias FL, Walder F, Leonhardt FD. The role of transoral robotic surgery in the management of oropharyngeal cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2017; DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000365.
  • 20 Trévillot V, Garrel R, Dombre E, Poignet P, Sobral R, Crampette L. Robotic endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery: review of the literature and future prospects. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2013; 130 (04) 201-207
  • 21 Schneider JS, Burgner J, Webster III RJ, Russell III PT. Robotic surgery for the sinuses and skull base: what are the possibilities and what are the obstacles?. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 21 (01) 11-16
  • 22 Wurm J, Bumm K, Steinhart H. , et al. Development of an active robot system for multi-modal paranasal sinus surgery [Article in German]. HNO 2005; 53 (05) 446-454
  • 23 Kristin J, Kolmer A, Kraus P, Geiger R, Klenzner T. Development of a new endoscope holder for head and neck surgery--from the technical design concept to implementation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272 (05) 1239-1244
  • 24 Nathan CO, Chakradeo V, Malhotra K, D'Agostino H, Patwardhan R. The voice-controlled robotic assist scope holder AESOP for the endoscopic approach to the sella. Skull Base 2006; 16 (03) 123-131
  • 25 Schuler PJ, Scheithauer M, Rotter N, Veit J, Duvvuri U, Hoffmann TK. A single-port operator-controlled flexible endoscope system for endoscopic skull base surgery. HNO 2015; 63 (03) 189-194
  • 26 Ebner FH, Roser F, Roder C, Tatagiba M, Schuhmann MU. Rigid, variable-view endoscope in neurosurgery: first intraoperative experience. Surg Innov 2015; 22 (04) 390-393
  • 27 Ali MJ, Singh S, Naik MN. The usefulness of continuously variable view rigid endoscope in lacrimal surgeries: first intraoperative experience. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 32 (06) 477-480
  • 28 Weber RK, Hosemann W. Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 14: Doc08
  • 29 Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Kassam AB. , et al. Endoscopic skull base surgery: principles of endonasal oncological surgery. J Surg Oncol 2008; 97 (08) 658-664
  • 30 Hoffmann TK, Scheithauer M, Koenig R, Schuler PJ. Anterior skull base defects - algorithm for reconstruction [Article in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 2014; 93 (11) 768-777
  • 31 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL. , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
  • 32 Ramakrishnan VR, Milam BM. Ergonomic analysis of the surgical position in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2017; DOI: 10.1007/s00405-009-1196-0.
  • 33 Castelnuovo P, Dallan I, Battaglia P, Bignami M. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: past, present and future. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267 (05) 649-663
  • 34 Choe JH, Lee KS, Jeun SS, Cho JH, Hong YK. Endocrine outcome of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery in functioning pituitary adenomas. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2008; 44 (03) 151-155
  • 35 Stankiewicz JA. Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1989; 22 (04) 749-758