The Journal of Hip Surgery 2017; 01(02): 074-079
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603627
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Irrigation and Debridement for Periprosthetic Hip Infection: Does Timing Play a Role?

Yousuf Sayeed
1   New York University Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
,
Mary Quien
1   New York University Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
,
Afshin A. Anoushiravani
1   New York University Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
,
Kelvin Y. Kim
1   New York University Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
,
Tristan Camus
1   New York University Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
,
Ran Schwarzkopf
1   New York University Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
,
Edward Adler
1   New York University Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

13 January 2017

22 April 2017

Publication Date:
31 May 2017 (online)

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The rate of PJIs in total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures varies from 0.3 to 2.9%. Irrigation and debridement (I&D) with modular implant exchange is often performed to treat PJIs. Early management of infection is cited to offer a higher success rate. The goal of this study was to examine the outcomes of early I&D for THA PJIs. We reviewed 38 patients diagnosed with a PJI between 2009 and 2014 who went on to have I&D with modular implant exchange. Patients were separated into three cohorts based on time from index procedure (≤4, 4–8, and ≥8 weeks), and were subsequently linked to treatment success and failure. Success was defined as the eradication of infection and resolution of presenting symptoms. All patients who required additional procedures due to infection were considered failures. Twenty-eight patients (73.7%) were successfully treated while 10 patients (26.3%) required further surgical interventions for persistent infection. Overall, average time between THA and I&D was 44.4 days. Successful I&Ds on average occurred within 41.9 days of the index procedure; while unsuccessful I&Ds were performed 51.6 days after index THA. Additionally, our study demonstrated that obese patients were more likely to fail debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and retention of the prosthesis (DAIR) procedures (p = 0.006). While our results demonstrate that the average time to I&D with a modular exchange was shorter for those who had a successful outcome, the difference was not significant (p = 0.37).

 
  • References

  • 1 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (04) 780-785
  • 2 Kuzyk PR, Dhotar HS, Sternheim A, Gross AE, Safir O, Backstein D. Two-stage revision arthroplasty for management of chronic periprosthetic hip and knee infection: techniques, controversies, and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22 (03) 153-164
  • 3 Parvizi J, Alijanipour P, Barberi EF. , et al. Novel developments in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2015; 23 (Suppl): S32-S43
  • 4 Kim JG, Bae JH, Lee SY, Cho WT, Lim HC. The parameters affecting the success of irrigation and debridement with component retention in the treatment of acutely infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 2015; 7 (01) 69-76
  • 5 Moyad TF, Thornhill T, Estok D. Evaluation and management of the infected total hip and knee. Orthopedics 2008; 31 (06) 581-588 , quiz 589–590
  • 6 Tintle SM, Forsberg JA, Potter BK, Islinger RB, Andersen RC. Prosthesis retention, serial debridement, and antibiotic bead use for the treatment of infection following total joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2009; 32 (02) 87
  • 7 Cobo J, Miguel LG, Euba G. , et al. Early prosthetic joint infection: outcomes with debridement and implant retention followed by antibiotic therapy. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17 (11) 1632-1637
  • 8 Kuiper JW, Willink RT, Moojen DJ, van den Bekerom MP, Colen S. Treatment of acute periprosthetic infections with prosthesis retention: review of current concepts. World J Orthop 2014; 5 (05) 667-676
  • 9 Wang KH, Yu SW, Iorio R, Marcantonio AJ, Kain MS. Long term treatment results for deep infections of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (09) 1623-1628
  • 10 Boraiah S, Joo L, Inneh IA. , et al. Management of modifiable risk factors prior to primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a readmission risk assessment tool. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (23) 1921-1928
  • 11 Barberán J, Aguilar L, Carroquino G. , et al. Conservative treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections in elderly patients. Am J Med 2006; 119 (11) 993.e7-993.e10
  • 12 Crockarell JR, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Morrey BF. Treatment of infection with débridement and retention of the components following hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80 (09) 1306-1313
  • 13 Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD. , et al. Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention of components. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42 (04) 471-478
  • 14 Ong KL, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Bozic KJ, Berry DJ, Parvizi J. Prosthetic joint infection risk after total hip arthroplasty in the medicare population. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (6, Suppl) 105-109
  • 15 Marchant Jr MH, Viens NA, Cook C, Vail TP, Bolognesi MP. The impact of glycemic control and diabetes mellitus on perioperative outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (07) 1621-1629
  • 16 Houdek MT, Wagner ER, Watts CD. , et al. Morbid obesity: a significant risk factor for failure of two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (04) 326-332
  • 17 Kuiper JW, Vos SJ, Saouti R. , et al. Prosthetic joint-associated infections treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and retention): analysis of risk factors and local antibiotic carriers in 91 patients. Acta Orthop 2013; 84 (04) 380-386
  • 18 de Vries LMA, van der Weegen W, Neve WC, Das HPW, Ridwan BU, Steens J. The effectiveness of debridement, antibiotics and irrigation for periprosthetic joint infections after primary hip and knee arthroplasty. A 15 years retrospective study in two community hospitals in the Netherlands. J Bone Joint Infect 2016; 1: 20-24
  • 19 Abudu A, Sivardeen KA, Grimer RJ, Pynsent PB, Noy M. The outcome of perioperative wound infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2002; 26 (01) 40-43
  • 20 Aggarwal VK, Bakhshi H, Ecker NU, Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Kendoff D. Organism profile in periprosthetic joint infection: pathogens differ at two arthroplasty infection referral centers in Europe and in the United States. J Knee Surg 2014; 27 (05) 399-406
  • 21 Benito N, Franco M, Coll P. , et al. Etiology of surgical site infections after primary total joint arthroplasties. J Orthop Res 2014; 32 (05) 633-637
  • 22 Kapadia BH, Jauregui JJ, Murray DP, Mont MA. Does preadmission cutaneous chlorhexidine preparation reduce surgical site infections after total hip arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474 (07) 1583-1588
  • 23 Crowe B, Payne A, Evangelista PJ. , et al. Risk factors for infection following total knee arthroplasty: a series of 3836 cases from one institution. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (12) 2275-2278
  • 24 Bergkvist M, Mukka SS, Johansson L. , et al. Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention in early periprosthetic joint infection. Hip Int 2016; 26 (02) 138-143