J Knee Surg 2018; 31(02): 197-201
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603337
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Constrained Condylar Knee Prosthesis Combined with a Posterior Stabilized Articular Surface

Shang-Wen Tsai
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
2   Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
,
Cheng-Fong Chen
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
2   Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
,
Po-Kuei Wu
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
2   Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
3   Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
,
Chao-Ming Chen
2   Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
3   Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
4   Rehabilitation and Technical Aid Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
,
Wei-Ming Chen
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
2   Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
4   Rehabilitation and Technical Aid Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 February 2017

31 March 2017

Publication Date:
23 May 2017 (online)

Abstract

Intraoperative assessment of valgus–varus stability is crucial for choosing articular surfaces with different levels of constraint. Legacy constrained condylar knee (CCK) prostheses are readily available to assemble and use with a CCK articular surface or a posterior stabilized (PS) articular surface in revision knee arthroplasty surgeries. We wanted to validate outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using legacy CCK prostheses combined with a PS articular surface. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled and followed up for more than 2 years. Range of motion (ROM), the Knee Society score (KSS), the Knee Society functional score (KSS-F), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were used to evaluate outcomes. Follow-up was a mean of 86.5 months (range: 28–152 months). The mean age of the participants was 69.8 years (range: 31–86 years). The mean ROM was 110.5 degrees, the KSS was 86.2 points, the KSS-F was 68.3 points, and the WOMAC score was 22.6 points. Seven participants had implant failures: five because of delayed infections and two because of posterior dislocations. In conclusion, revision TKA using a CCK prosthesis combined with a PS articular surface might provide satisfactory mid-term outcomes. Delayed infection was the most common cause of implant failure. Dislocation might occur in middle-old or older patients despite careful intraoperative examination of valgus–varus stability, extension–flexion gap balancing, and signs of recurvatum.

 
  • References

  • 1 Haas SB, Insall JN, Montgomery III W, Windsor RE. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77 (11) 1700-1707
  • 2 Whaley AL, Trousdale RT, Rand JA, Hanssen AD. Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (05) 592-599
  • 3 Lee JK, Kim SJ, Choi CH, Chung HK. Revision total knee arthroplasty using a constrained condylar knee prosthesis in conjunction with a posterior stabilized articular polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (04) 566-569
  • 4 Kim YH, Kim JS. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (06) 1440-1447
  • 5 Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Oh HK. Long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship of revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (10) 1804-1809
  • 6 Wilke B, Wagner E, Trousdale R. Long-term survival of a semi-constrained implant following revision for infection. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (05) 808-812
  • 7 Hossain F, Patel S, Haddad FS. Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (05) 1221-1228
  • 8 Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28 (02) 88-96
  • 9 Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (248) 13-14
  • 10 Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 1999; 48: 167-175
  • 11 Insall J, Salvati E. Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 1971; 101 (01) 101-104
  • 12 Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (248) 9-12
  • 13 Kalyani RR, Corriere M, Ferrucci L. Age-related and disease-related muscle loss: the effect of diabetes, obesity, and other diseases. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2 (10) 819-829
  • 14 Zizza CA, Ellison KJ, Wernette CM. Total water intakes of community-living middle-old and oldest-old adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2009; 64 (04) 481-486
  • 15 Barrack RL, Lyons TR, Ingraham RQ, Johnson JC. The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (07) 858-866
  • 16 Vince KG, Long W. Revision knee arthroplasty. The limits of press fit medullary fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (317) 172-177