Download PDF
J Pediatr Genet 2017; 06(03): 149-154
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1600131
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Attitude toward Prenatal Testing and Termination of Pregnancy among Health Professionals and Medical Students in Saudi Arabia

Nagwa E. A. Gaboon
1   Division of Medicine, Department of Genetic Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2   Division of Medicine, Medical Genetic Center, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Khadijah H. Bakur
1   Division of Medicine, Department of Genetic Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
3   Princess Al-Jawhara Al-Brahim Center of Excellence in Research of Hereditary Disorders, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
,
Alaa Y. Edrees
3   Princess Al-Jawhara Al-Brahim Center of Excellence in Research of Hereditary Disorders, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
,
Jumana Y. Al-Aama
1   Division of Medicine, Department of Genetic Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
3   Princess Al-Jawhara Al-Brahim Center of Excellence in Research of Hereditary Disorders, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 November 2016

01 February 2017

Publication Date:
16 March 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Correction to:

Erratum: Attitude toward Prenatal Testing and Termination of Pregnancy among Health Professionals and Medical Students in Saudi ArabiaJ Pediatr Genet eFirst
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603198

Abstract

This study was aimed at assessing the attitude of health care professionals in Jeddah city toward prenatal diagnosis (PND) and termination of pregnancy (TOP). A cross-sectional study was conducted, and the participants completed a self-administered questionnaire. Approximately 82% of participants showed a consistent trend of accepting PND when appropriate, and 47.5% of the respondents were in favor of TOP if the fetus had a severe disease. Compared with men (69.3%), a significantly greater number of women (88%) accepted to have PND. The most acceptable prenatal diagnostic tests in the study were invasive techniques as most of the participants thought that noninvasive tests were nonspecific.

Keywords

prenatal diagnosis - termination of pregnancy - noninvasive procedures - invasive procedures
 

  • References

  • 1 Turnpenny PD, Ellard S. Emery's Elements of Medical Genetics. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 2 al Husain M, al Bunyan M. Consanguineous marriages in a Saudi population and the effect of inbreeding on prenatal and postnatal mortality. Ann Trop Paediatr 1997; 17 (02) 155-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 El-Mouzan MI, Al-Salloum AA, Al-Herbish AS, Qurachi MM, Al-Omar AA. Regional variations in the prevalence of consanguinity in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2007; 28 (12) 1881-1884
    Google Scholar
  • 4 NDR. Central Department of Statistics & Information. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Yotsumoto J, Sekizawa A, Koide K. , et al. Attitudes toward non-invasive prenatal diagnosis among pregnant women and health professionals in Japan. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32 (07) 674-679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Palomaki GE, Kloza EM, Lambert-Messerlian GM. , et al. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to detect Down syndrome: an international clinical validation study. Genet Med 2011; 13 (11) 913-920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hall S, Abramsky L, Marteau TM. Health professionals' reports of information given to parents following the prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome anomalies and outcomes of pregnancies: a pilot study. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23 (07) 535-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mishori Dery A, Carmi R, Shoham Vardi I. Attitudes toward the acceptability of reasons for pregnancy termination due to fetal abnormalities among prenatal care providers and consumers in Israel. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28 (06) 518-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Albar MA. Ethical considerations in the prevention and management of genetic disorders with special emphasis on religious considerations. Saudi Med J 2002; 23 (06) 627-632
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Al-Aqeel AI. Ethical guidelines in genetics and genomics. An Islamic perspective. Saudi Med J 2005; 26 (12) 1862-1870
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 El-Hazmi MA. Ethics of genetic counseling—basic concepts and relevance to Islamic communities. Ann Saudi Med 2004; 24 (02) 84-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Shomali MA. Islamic bioethics: a general scheme. J Med Ethics Hist Med 2008; 1: 1-1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Darwish B. Arab Perspectives. In: Henk AMJ, Gordijn B. , eds. Handbook of Global Bioethics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014: 269-291
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sultan HA, Harper JC. Legalization and Islamic bioethical perspectives on prenatal diagnosis and advanced uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Saudi Arabia. J Clin Res Bioeth 2012; S1: 003 . Doi: 10.4172/2155-9627.S1-003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Dahl K, Kesmodel U, Hvidman L, Olesen F. Informed consent: attitudes, knowledge and information concerning prenatal examinations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85 (12) 1414-1419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Shoham-Vardi I, Weiner N, Weitzman D, Levcovich A. Termination of pregnancy: attitudes and behavior of women in a traditional society. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24 (11) 869-875
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Quadrelli R, Quadrelli A, Mechoso B, Laufer M, Jaumandreu C, Vaglio A. Parental decisions to abort or continue a pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in a setting where termination of pregnancy is not legally available. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27 (03) 228-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 de Silva DC, Jayawardana P, Hapangama A. , et al. Attitudes toward prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for genetic disorders among healthcare workers in a selected setting in Sri Lanka. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28 (08) 715-721
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fida NM, Al-Aama J, Nichols W, Nichols W, Alqahtani M. A prospective study of congenital malformations among live born neonates at a University Hospital in Western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2007; 28 (09) 1367-1373
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Christianson A, Howson C, Modell B. The March of Dimes Global Report on Birth Defects. The Hidden Toll of Dying and Disabled Children. [Libro en Internet]. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes Foundation Birth Defects Foundation; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Holt RI, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM. Key concepts in screening for depression in people with diabetes. J Affect Disord 2012; 142 (Suppl): S72-S79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Garel M, Gosme-Seguret S, Kaminski M, Cuttini M. Ethical decision-making in prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: a qualitative survey among physicians and midwives. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22 (09) 811-817
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Campbell AM, Heyer LJ. Discovering Genomics, Proteomics, and Bioinformatics. San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Burke W, Psaty BM. Personalized medicine in the era of genomics. JAMA 2007; 298 (14) 1682-1684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wieacker P, Steinhard J. The prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010; 107 (48) 857-862
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Babay ZA. Attitudes of a high-risk group of pregnant Saudi Arabian women to prenatal screening for chromosomal anomalies. East Mediterr Health J 2004; 10 (4–5): 522-527
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Al-Aama JY, Al-Nabulsi BK, Alyousef MA, Asiri NA, Al-Blewi SM. Knowledge regarding the national premarital screening program among university students in western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2008; 29 (11) 1649-1653
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Alsulaiman A, Hewison J. Attitudes to prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy in Saudi Arabia. Community Genet 2007; 10 (03) 169-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Brockopp JE. Islamic Ethics of Life: Abortion, War and Euthanasia. Columbia MO: University of South Carolina Press; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Balkan M, Kalkanli S, Akbas H, Yalinkaya A, Alp MN, Budak T. Parental decisions regarding a prenatally detected fetal chromosomal abnormality and the impact of genetic counseling: an analysis of 38 cases with aneuploidy in Southeast Turkey. J Genet Couns 2010; 19 (03) 241-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gardner RM, Sutherland GR, Shaffer LG. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Warburton D, Dallaire L, Thangavelu M, Ross L, Levin B, Kline J. Trisomy recurrence: a reconsideration based on North American data. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 75 (03) 376-385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lamb NE, Yu K, Shaffer J, Feingold E, Sherman SL. Association between maternal age and meiotic recombination for trisomy 21. Am J Hum Genet 2005; 76 (01) 91-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Habib FA. Antenatal screening strategies for Down syndrome: analysis of existing protocols and implications in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. BJMMR 2011; 1: 105-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Al-Aama JY, Bondagji NS, El-Harouni AA. Congenital heart defects in Down syndrome patients from western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2012; 33 (11) 1211-1215
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Burgin KB. Prenatal genetic screening. J Midwifery Womens Health 2008; 53 (04) 391-392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Alam AA. Perception of female students of King Saud university towards premarital screening. J Family Community Med 2006; 13 (02) 83-88
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Ngim CF, Lai NM, Ibrahim H, Ratnasingam V. Attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and abortion in a multi-ethnic country: a survey among parents of children with thalassaemia major in Malaysia. J Community Genet 2013; 4 (02) 215-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar