J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 78(04): 283-287
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598636
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Facial Nerve Schwannomas Mimicking as Vestibular Schwannomas

Beth N. McNulty
1   Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States
,
Sean Wise
2   Department of Otology, Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Naval Medical Center, San Diego, California, United States
,
David S. Cohen
3   Department of Otolaryngology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States
,
Jason Bell
4   Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois, United States
,
Dennis Bojrab
5   Department of Otology, Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States
,
Michael LaRouere
5   Department of Otology, Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States
,
Matthew Kircher
4   Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois, United States
,
Seilesh Babu
5   Department of Otology, Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

13 June 2016

01 December 2016

Publication Date:
30 January 2017 (online)

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to identify preoperative and intraoperative findings that may aid in distinguishing facial nerve schwannomas (FNS) from vestibular schwannomas (VSs), particularly in cases limited to the internal auditory canal (IAC) and cerebellopontine angle (CPA).

Study Design This was a retrospective study.

Setting This study was set at a Tertiary Referral Center.

Patients Seventeen cases from October 2002 to July 2015 with an IAC/CPA mass presumed to be a VS who were found to have a FNS intraoperatively.

Main Outcome Measures The main outcome measures included preoperative presentation, intraoperative findings, and subsequent intervention.

Results Preoperative hearing loss and imbalance were seen in 70.5 and 64.7%, respectively. Suspicious intraoperative findings included: facial nerve incorporated intimately with the tumor capsule in 12 cases; spontaneous action potentials noted while drilling the bony IAC in 3 cases; and action potentials noted on stimulation of the entire tumor capsule in 10 cases. The mean long-term facial function was House–Brackmann grade II and the mean length of follow-up was 4.86 years.

Conclusion FNSs are rare and may be difficult to distinguish from VS preoperatively. Surgical findings that should raise concern include spontaneous action potentials during drilling the bony IAC, absence of a plane of dissection between the facial nerve and tumor, or stimulation of the tumor capsule.

 
  • References

  • 1 Nadeau DP, Sataloff RT. Fascicle preservation surgery for facial nerve neuromas involving the posterior cranial fossa. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24 (02) 317-325
  • 2 Wilkinson EP, Hoa M, Slattery WH. , et al. Evolution in the management of facial nerve schwannoma. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (10) 2065-2074
  • 3 House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93 (02) 146-147
  • 4 Brackmann DE, House JW, Seltyers W. Auditory brainstem responses in facial nerve neurinoma diagnosis. In: Graham MD, House WF. , eds. Disorders of the Facial Nerve: Anatomy, Diagnosis, and Management. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1982: 87Y9
  • 5 Angeli SI, Brackmann DE. Is surgical excision of facial nerve schwannomas always indicated?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117 (06) S144-S147
  • 6 Shirazi MA, Leonetti JP, Marzo SJ, Anderson DE. Surgical management of facial neuromas: lessons learned. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28 (07) 958-963
  • 7 Kertesz TR, Shelton C, Wiggins RH, Salzman KL, Glastonbury CM, Harnsberger R. Intratemporal facial nerve neuroma: anatomical location and radiological features. Laryngoscope 2001; 111 (07) 1250-1256
  • 8 Fagan PA, Misra SN, Doust B. Facial neuroma of the cerebellopontine angle and the internal auditory canal. Laryngoscope 1993; 103 (4 Pt 1): 442-446
  • 9 Sherman JD, Dagnew E, Pensak ML, van Loveren HR, Tew Jr JM. Facial nerve neuromas: report of 10 cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 2002; 50 (03) 450-456
  • 10 Kania RE, Herman P, Tran Ba Huy P. Vestibular-like facial nerve schwannoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 131 (02) 159
  • 11 King TT, Morrison AW. Primary facial nerve tumors within the skull. J Neurosurg 1990; 72 (01) 1-8
  • 12 House W, Luettje C. Evaluation and preservation of facial nerve function. In: House W, Luettje C. , eds. Acoustic Nerve Tumors Management. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1979: 93
  • 13 McRackan TR, Rivas AB, Wanna GJ. , et al. Facial nerve outcomes in facial nerve schwannomas. Otol Neurotol 2012; 33 (01) 78-82
  • 14 Kircher ML, Kartush JM. Pitfalls in intraoperative nerve monitoring during vestibular schwannoma surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 33 (03) E5
  • 15 Dickins JR, Graham SS. A comparison of facial nerve monitoring systems in cerebellopontine angle surgery. Am J Otol 1991; 12 (01) 1-6
  • 16 Harner SG, Daube JR, Ebersold MJ, Beatty CW. Improved preservation of facial nerve function with use of electrical monitoring during removal of acoustic neuromas. Mayo Clin Proc 1987; 62 (02) 92-102
  • 17 Kwartler JA, Luxford WM, Atkins J, Shelton C. Facial nerve monitoring in acoustic tumor surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 104 (06) 814-817
  • 18 Magliulo G, Petti R, Vingolo GM, Cristofari P, Ronzoni R. Facial nerve monitoring in skull base surgery. J Laryngol Otol 1994; 108 (07) 557-559
  • 19 Silverstein H, Rosenberg SI, Flanzer J, Seidman MD. Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in acoustic neuroma surgery. Am J Otol 1993; 14 (06) 524-532
  • 20 National Institutes of Health. Acoustic Neuroma. NIH Consensus Statement. December, 1991 . Available at: http://consensus.nih.gov /1991/1991AcousticNeuroma087html.htm . Accessed April 21, 2016