Semin Plast Surg 2017; 31(01): 051-057
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598628
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Evaluation, Treatment, and Complication Minimization

Patrick Yang
1   Division of Oculofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
,
Audrey C. Ko
1   Division of Oculofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
,
Don O. Kikkawa
1   Division of Oculofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
,
Bobby S. Korn
1   Division of Oculofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
2   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 February 2017 (online)

Abstract

Upper eyelid blepharoplasty is one of the most common procedures performed worldwide for both functional and cosmetic indications. There is a high rate of patient satisfaction; however, in this era of social media, patient expectations are higher than ever. Today's digitally savvy patients expect perfect outcomes with no complications and rapid recovery. To achieve optimal results, a careful preoperative evaluation and sound surgical technique is essential for minimizing complications. Here the authors review their approach to the management of the blepharoplasty patient.

 
  • References

  • 1 Oh SR, Chokthaweesak W, Annunziata CC, Priel A, Korn BS, Kikkawa DO. Analysis of eyelid fat pad changes with aging. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 27 (5) 348-351
  • 2 Neimkin MG, Couch SM, Holds JB, Bodnar ZM, Reggie SN. The role of surgeon technique in current practice patterns for combined ptosis and dermatochalasis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000668.
  • 3 Park DD. Aging Asian upper blepharoplasty and brow. Semin Plast Surg 2015; 29 (3) 188-200
  • 4 Korn BS, Kikkawa DO, Schanzlin DJ. Blepharoplasty in the post-laser in situ keratomileusis patient: preoperative considerations to avoid dry eye syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (7) 2232-2239
  • 5 Rees TD. The “dry eye” complication after a blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 56 (4) 375-380
  • 6 Teng CC, Reddy S, Wong JJ, Lisman RD. Retrobulbar hemorrhage nine days after cosmetic blepharoplasty resulting in permanent visual loss. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 22 (5) 388-389
  • 7 Parikh M, Kwon YH. Vision loss after inadvertent corneal perforation during lid anesthesia. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 27 (5) e141-e142
  • 8 Mauriello Jr JA ; Atypical Mycobacterial Study Group. Atypical mycobacterial infection of the periocular region after periocular and facial surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 19 (3) 182-188
  • 9 Syniuta LA, Goldberg RA, Thacker NM, Rosenbaum AL. Acquired strabismus following cosmetic blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (6) 2053-2059
  • 10 Sires BS, Saari JC, Garwin GG, Hurst JS, van Kuijk FJ. The color difference in orbital fat. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119 (6) 868-871
  • 11 Choi HS, Whipple KM, Oh SR , et al. Modifying the upper eyelid crease in Asian patients with hyaluronic acid fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (2) 844-849