J Knee Surg 2017; 30(07): 730-733
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598040
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Does Manipulation under Anesthesia Increase the Risk of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Matched Case Control Study

Todd P. Pierce
1   Seton Hall School of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Kimona Issa
1   Seton Hall School of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Anthony Festa
1   Seton Hall School of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Anthony J. Scillia
1   Seton Hall School of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Vincent K. McInerney
1   Seton Hall School of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, South Orange, New Jersey
,
Michael A. Mont
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

21 November 2016

19 December 2016

Publication Date:
14 February 2017 (online)

Abstract

Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) can help patients regain an adequate range of motion (ROM) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although there are studies reporting that MUA can assist in improving ROM, there is a paucity of studies regarding whether requiring an MUA is associated with an increased risk of revision. The purpose of this study was to assess the: (1) incidence of revision TKA and (2) outcomes of those undergoing MUA and compare it with a matched cohort who did not require MUA. A prospectively collected database of two high-volume institutions was assessed for patients who required a single MUA following TKA between 2005 and 2011. We found a total of 138 knees with a mean 8.5-year follow-up post-MUA. We compared this with a matched cohort (1:1) who underwent TKA during this same time period but did not require an MUA. Incidence of revision surgery and clinical outcomes were compared between the two cohorts. Within the MUA cohort, nine knees underwent revision, which was similar to the matched cohort that had seven revisions (93 vs. 95%; p = 0.6). The mean KSS-functional (88 vs. 90 points; p = 0.15) and clinical scores (87 vs. 89 points; p = 0.1) were similar between the two cohorts. Undergoing an MUA was not associated with an increased risk of revision TKA. If patients require MUA, they may still achieve satisfactory outcomes. This information can be used in educating patients so they may be able to formulate their expectations following their MUA.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kim J, Nelson CL, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (07) 1479-1484
  • 2 Pivec R, Issa K, Kester M, Harwin SF, Mont MA. Long-term outcomes of MUA for stiffness in primary TKA. J Knee Surg 2013; 26 (06) 405-410
  • 3 Maloney WJ. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (06) (Suppl. 01) 71-73
  • 4 Issa K, Banerjee S, Kester MA, Khanuja HS, Delanois RE, Mont MA. The effect of timing of manipulation under anesthesia to improve range of motion and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (16) 1349-1357
  • 5 Issa K, Kapadia BH, Kester M, Khanuja HS, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Clinical, objective, and functional outcomes of manipulation under anesthesia to treat knee stiffness following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (03) 548-552
  • 6 Issa K, Pierce TP, Brothers A. , et al. What is the efficacy of repeat manipulations under anesthesia to treat stiffness following primary total knee arthroplasty?. Surg Technol Int 2016; 28: 236-241
  • 7 Issa K, Rifai A, Boylan MR, Pourtaheri S, McInerney VK, Mont MA. Do various factors affect the frequency of manipulation under anesthesia after primary total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (01) 143-147
  • 8 Fox JL, Poss R. The role of manipulation following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63 (03) 357-362
  • 9 Manrique J, Gomez MM, Parvizi J. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2015; 28 (02) 119-126
  • 10 Seyler TM, Marker DR, Bhave A. , et al. Functional problems and arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (Suppl. 03) 59-69
  • 11 Desai AS, Karmegam A, Dramis A, Board TN, Raut V. Manipulation for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty: when and how often to do it?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014; 24 (07) 1291-1295
  • 12 Werner BC, Carr JB, Wiggins JC, Gwathmey FW, Browne JA. Manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty is associated with an increased incidence of subsequent revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (9, Suppl): 72-75
  • 13 Namba RS, Inacio M. Early and late manipulation improve flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (06) (Suppl. 02) 58-61
  • 14 Pariente GM, Lombardi Jr AV, Berend KR, Mallory TH, Adams JB. Manipulation with prolonged epidural analgesia for treatment of TKA complicated by arthrofibrosis. Surg Technol Int 2006; 15: 221-224