Complex Orofacial Reconstruction with the Intrinsic Chimeric Flap

Abstract

Background Ablation of locally advanced or recurrent head and neck cancer often results in large composite orofacial defects with limited recipient vessels. These complex defects lend well to intrinsic chimeric flap reconstruction, which allows greater ability to inset various flap component tissue types than composite flaps and requires only one set of microvascular anastomoses.

Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent orofacial reconstruction with an intrinsic chimeric free flap from 2002 to 2015. Flaps with only one tissue type, such as two separate skin paddles with no additional component, were not considered chimeric flaps and therefore not included in this report. Patient demographic data, defect, and flap characteristics, as well as complications and outcomes were analyzed to create a guide for flap selection. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine risk factors for flap take-back and failure.

Results Seventy-five patients underwent orofacial intrinsic chimeric free flap reconstruction. Results were organized based on defect characteristics to create a guide for flap selection. The number of chimeric flap components and operation duration were independently statistically associated with flap take-backs (p < 0.05). There were two (3%) total and five (7%) partial flap losses. Average follow-up time was 32.7 months.

Conclusions Intrinsic chimeric flaps provide a versatile and elegant reconstructive option for a variety of complex orofacial defects. We provide a guide to facilitate decision making in flap selection for these challenging reconstructions and report factors associated with flap take-backs and losses.

Keywords

intrinsic chimeric flap - head and neck reconstruction - free flap design

• References

• 1 Agarwal JP, Agarwal S, Adler N, Gottlieb LJ. Refining the intrinsic chimera flap: a review. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63 (4) 462-467
• 2 Homer, ed. The Iliad. Penguin; 1990
• 3 Sanger JR, Matloub HS, Yousif NJ. Sequential connection of flaps: a logical approach to customized mandibular reconstruction. Am J Surg 1990; 160 (4) 402-404
• 4 Hallock GG. Simultaneous transposition of anterior thigh muscle and fascia flaps: an introduction to the chimera flap principle. Ann Plast Surg 1991; 27 (2) 126-131
• 5 Koshima I, Yamamoto H, Hosoda M, Moriguchi T, Orita Y, Nagayama H. Free combined composite flaps using the lateral circumflex femoral system for repair of massive defects of the head and neck regions: an introduction to the chimeric flap principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92 (3) 411-420
• 6 Hallock GG. The complete nomenclature for combined perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (4) 1720-1729
• 7 Taylor GI, Townsend P, Corlett R. Superiority of the deep circumflex iliac vessels as the supply for free groin flaps. Clinical work. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 64 (6) 745-759
• 8 Bergeron L, Tang M, Morris SF. The anatomical basis of the deep circumflex iliac artery perforator flap with iliac crest. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (1) 252-258
• 9 Hallock GG. Further clarification of the nomenclature for compound flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (7) 151e-160e
• 10 Wolff K-D, Kesting M, Thurmüller P, Böckmann R, Hölzle F. The anterolateral thigh as a universal donor site for soft tissue reconstruction in maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006; 34 (6) 323-331
• 11 Lin CH, Wei FC, Lin YT, Yeh J-T, Rodriguez EdeJ, Chen CT. Lateral circumflex femoral artery system: warehouse for functional composite free-tissue reconstruction of the lower leg. J Trauma 2006; 60 (5) 1032-1036
• 12 Adler N, Dorafshar AH, Agarwal JP, Gottlieb LJ. Harvesting the lateral femoral circumflex chimera free flap: guidelines for elevation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (3) 918-925
• 13 Massarelli O, Gobbi R, Biglio A, Soma D, Tullio A. Chimeric lateral supramalleolar artery perforator fibula free flap in the reconstruction of composite head and neck defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133 (1) 130-136
• 14 Roan TL, Chen CC, Yu YC , et al. A modified free chimeric osteocutaneous fibular flap design for head and neck reconstruction: experience on a series of 10 cases. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (6) 439-446
• 15 Germann G, Bickert B, Steinau HU, Wagner H, Sauerbier M. Versatility and reliability of combined flaps of the subscapular system. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (5) 1386-1399
• 16 Daya M. Simultaneous total upper and lower lip reconstruction with a free radial forearm-palmaris longus tendon and brachioradialis chimeric flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (1) e75-e76
• 17 Lee JC, Kleiber GM, Pelletier AT, Reid RR, Gottlieb LJ. Autologous immediate cranioplasty with vascularized bone in high-risk composite cranial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (4) 967-975
• 18 Dorafshar AH, Seitz IA, DeWolfe M, Agarwal JP, Gottlieb LJ. Split lateral iliac crest chimera flap: utility of the ascending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (2) 574-581
• 19 Hanasono MM, Corbitt CA, Yu P, Skoracki RJ. Success of sequential free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (9) 1186-1193
• 20 Hanasono MM, Weinstock YE, Yu P. Reconstruction of extensive head and neck defects with multiple simultaneous free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (6) 1739-1746
• 21 Jones NF, Jarrahy R, Song JI, Kaufman MR, Markowitz B. Postoperative medical complications—not microsurgical complications—negatively influence the morbidity, mortality, and true costs after microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (7) 2053-2060
• 22 Wei FC, Yazar S, Lin CH, Cheng MH, Tsao CK, Chiang YC. Double free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2005; 32 (3) 303-308 , v
• 23 Posch NAS, Mureau MAM, Dumans AG, Hofer SOP. Functional and aesthetic outcome and survival after double free flap reconstruction in advanced head and neck cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (1) 124-129