Retrospective Matched-Pair Cohort Study on Effect of Bisegmental Fenestration versus Hemilaminectomy for Bisegmental Spinal Canal Stenosis at L3–L4 and L4–L5

Abstract

Background The main symptoms of degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis are progressive back pain, spinal claudication, and, occasionally, sensory and motor deficits. Impairments particularly occur during walking, standing, and sitting. Thus social and vocational activities are increasingly restricted, causing considerable suffering for patients. Surgical therapies are superior to conservative ones. This article studies the outcome of 2-level fenestration versus hemilaminectomy for bisegmental spinal stenosis decompression.

Methods This retrospective matched-pair cohort study included a total of 144 patients who underwent surgery for bisegmental spinal stenosis at the levels L3-4 and L4-5 between 2008 and 2012. There were 72 matching pairs that corresponded in sex, year of birth, and width of the stenosed segments. The patients' impairments were reported before, immediately after, and 6 and 12 months after surgery using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ-D) and the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). The data were evaluated statistically.

Results The comparison of both surgical procedures regarding walking ability (walking a distance with and without a walking aid) revealed a significant difference. Patients who underwent hemilaminectomy had better postoperative results. The individual criteria of the ODQ-D and EQ-5D revealed no significant differences between 2-level fenestration and hemilaminectomy; however, there is always significant postoperative improvement in comparison with preoperative status. Age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, smoking, and alcohol consumption had no influence on the surgical results. The reoperation rate was between 13% and 15% for both surgical techniques, not being significantly different.

Conclusion Fenestration and hemilaminectomy are equivalent therapies for bisegmental lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Regarding walking, the study revealed better results for hemilaminectomy than for fenestration in this cohort of patients. Pain intensity, personal care, lifting and carrying of objects, sitting, social life, and travel all improved significantly postoperatively as compared with preoperatively. In both groups, health status as the decisive predictor improved considerably after surgery. We could show that both surgical methods result in significant postoperative improvement of all the individual criteria of the ODQ-D and the EQ-5D.

Keywords

spinal stenosis - fenestration - hemilaminectomy

• References

• 1 Kehler U. Lumbale Spinalkanalstenose mit Claudicatio spinalis. Medtropole 2009; 17: 655-657
• 2 Thomé C, Börm W, Meyer F. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: current strategies in diagnosis and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008; 105 (20) 373-379
• 3 Polikandriotis JA, Hudak EM, Perry MW. Minimally invasive surgery through endoscopic laminotomy and foraminotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop 2013; 10 (01) 13-16
• 4 Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD. , et al; SPORT Investigators. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (08) 794-810
• 5 Nerland US, Jakola AS, Solheim O. , et al. Comparative effectiveness of microdecompression and laminectomy for central lumbar spinal stenosis: study protocol for an observational study. BMJ Open 2014; 4 (03) e004651
• 6 Röder C, Neukamp M, Zweig T. , et al. Spine Tango Report 2009 [in German]. Available at: http://www.eurospine.org/cm_data/Spine_Tango_Report_2009_German_2.pdf . Accessed October 10, 2015
• 7 Mannion AF, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Fairbank JC. Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 2006; 15 (01) 66-73
• 8 Amir T. Rückenschmerzen im Alltag bestimmen. Physiopraxis 2009; 7–8: 46-47
• 9 Springer Gabler. Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, EQ-5D (EuroQol) (2008). Available at: http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/18104/eq-5d-euroqol-v10.html . Accessed November 10, 2015
• 10 Schulte TL, Bullmann V, Lerner T. , et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Orthopade 2006; 35 (06) 675-692 ; quiz 693–694
• 11 Mobbs RJ, Li J, Sivabalan P, Raley D, Rao PJ. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article,. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21 (02) 179-186
• 12 Rampersaud, Raja Y. Elderly patients have similar outcomes compared to younger patients after minimally invasive surgery for spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (06) 1824-1830
• 13 Munting E, Röder C, Sobottke R, Dietrich D, Aghayev E. ; Spine Tango Contributors. Patient outcomes after laminotomy, hemilaminectomy, laminectomy and laminectomy with instrumented fusion for spinal canal stenosis: a propensity score-based study from the Spine Tango registry. Eur Spine J 2015; 24 (02) 358-368
• 14 Rompe JD, Eysel P, Zöllner J, Nafe B, Heine J. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Long-term results after undercutting decompression compared with decompressive laminectomy alone or with instrumented fusion. Neurosurg Rev 1999; 22 (2–3): 102-106
• 15 Aizawa T, Ozawa H, Kusakabe T. , et al. Reoperation rates after fenestration for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a 20-year period survival function method analysis. Eur Spine J 2015; 24 (02) 381-387
• 16 Yamada K, Toyoda H, Terai H, Takahashi S, Nakamura H. Spinopelvic alignment of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2014; 23 (06) 1302-1308
• 17 Galiano K, Obwegeser AA, Gabl MV, Bauer R, Twerdy K. Long-term outcome of laminectomy for spinal stenosis in octogenarians. Spine 2005; 30 (03) 332-335
• 18 Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Airaksinen O. , et al. Somatic comorbidity and younger age are associated with life dissatisfaction among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before surgical treatment. Eur Spine J 2007; 16 (07) 857-864
• 19 Ammendolia C, Stuber K, Tomkins-Lane C. , et al. What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review. Eur Spine J 2014; 23 (06) 1282-1301