Blood Pressure Profiles Across Pregnancy in Women with Chronic Hypertension

Abstract

Objective To examine blood pressure patterns across pregnancy in women with treated chronic hypertension according to the occurrence of severe preeclampsia, growth restriction, and preterm birth <34 weeks.

Methods This retrospective descriptive case study included only pregnant women receiving antihypertensive therapy. Using a random effects model, mean arterial pressures were plotted across gestation for women with and without preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and preterm birth <34 weeks with differences analyzed for each curve.

Results Between January 2002 and December 2014, 447 women met inclusion criteria. Of these women, 65% developed severe preeclampsia, 24% delivered an infant weighing <10th percentile, and 15% had a preterm birth <34 weeks. Women diagnosed with either preeclampsia (23.3 vs 26.4 weeks; mean difference, 3.1 weeks; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3–4.3), fetal growth restriction (23.5 vs 24.9 weeks; mean difference, 1.4 weeks; 95% CI, 0.2–2.6), or preterm birth (19.8 vs 24.9 weeks; mean difference, 5.1 weeks; 95% CI, 3.7–6.9) reached a blood pressure nadir at a significantly earlier gestational age than those who did not.

Conclusion For pregnant women with treated chronic hypertension, blood pressure patterns differ significantly in those who develop severe preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and preterm birth <34 weeks.

Keywords

blood pressure trends - hypertension-related morbidities - preeclampsia - preterm birth - small for gestational age

• References

• 1 MacGillivray I, Rose GA, Rowe B. Blood pressure survey in pregnancy. Clin Sci 1969; 37 (2) 395-407
• 2 Page EW, Christianson R. The impact of mean arterial pressure in the middle trimester upon the outcome of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 125 (6) 740-746
• 3 Ochsenbein-Kölble N, Roos M, Gasser T, Huch R, Huch A, Zimmermann R. Cross sectional study of automated blood pressure measurements throughout pregnancy. BJOG 2004; 111 (4) 319-325
• 4 Grindheim G, Estensen ME, Langesaeter E, Rosseland LA, Toska K. Changes in blood pressure during healthy pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort study. J Hypertens 2012; 30 (2) 342-350
• 5 Rang S, Wolf H, van Montfrans GA, Karemaker JM. Serial assessment of cardiovascular control shows early signs of developing pre-eclampsia. J Hypertens 2004; 22 (2) 369-376
• 6 Rang S, van Montfrans GA, Wolf H. Serial hemodynamic measurement in normal pregnancy, preeclampsia, and intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198 (5) 519.e1-519.e9
• 7 Macdonald-Wallis C, Lawlor DA, Fraser A, May M, Nelson SM, Tilling K. Blood pressure change in normotensive, gestational hypertensive, preeclamptic, and essential hypertensive pregnancies. Hypertension 2012; 59 (6) 1241-1248
• 8 Magnussen EB, Vatten LJ, Lund-Nilsen TI, Salvesen KA, Davey Smith G, Romundstad PR. Prepregnancy cardiovascular risk factors as predictors of pre-eclampsia: population based cohort study. BMJ 2007; 335 (7627) 978
• 9 Gant NF, Daley GL, Chand S, Whalley PJ, MacDonald PC. A study of angiotensin II pressor response throughout primigravid pregnancy. J Clin Invest 1973; 52 (11) 2682-2689
• 10 National High Blood Pressure Education Program: Report on National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Press in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: S1-S22
• 11 August P, Lenz T, Ales KL , et al. Longitudinal study of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in hypertensive pregnant women: deviations related to the development of superimposed preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163 (5 Pt 1): 1612-1621